PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EFRN.L vs. GBP5.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EFRN.L vs. GBP5.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in iShares EUR Floating Rate Bond ESG UCITS ETF EUR (Dist) (EFRN.L) and L&G ESG GBP Corporate Bond 0-5 Year UCITS ETF (GBP5.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

EFRN.L is traded in EUR, while GBP5.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the GBP5.L values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period


EFRN.L

1D
1M
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

GBP5.L

1D
-0.02%
1M
0.85%
YTD
1.78%
6M
2.28%
1Y
1.95%
3Y*
5.90%
5Y*
2.17%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EFRN.L vs. GBP5.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
EFRN.L
iShares EUR Floating Rate Bond ESG UCITS ETF EUR (Dist)
0.00%2.41%4.35%3.98%-0.12%-0.10%
GBP5.L
L&G ESG GBP Corporate Bond 0-5 Year UCITS ETF
1.78%0.82%9.60%9.16%-10.98%3.43%

Correlation

The correlation between EFRN.L and GBP5.L is -0.11, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.11

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.05

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.01

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 16, 2021

0.01

The correlation between EFRN.L and GBP5.L shifts across timeframes, from -0.11 (1 year) to 0.05 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EFRN.L vs. GBP5.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EFRN.L

GBP5.L
GBP5.L Risk / Return Rank: 4545
Overall Rank
GBP5.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3838
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GBP5.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 3737
Sortino Ratio Rank
GBP5.L Omega Ratio Rank: 4444
Omega Ratio Rank
GBP5.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 5353
Calmar Ratio Rank
GBP5.L Martin Ratio Rank: 5454
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EFRN.L vs. GBP5.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares EUR Floating Rate Bond ESG UCITS ETF EUR (Dist) (EFRN.L) and L&G ESG GBP Corporate Bond 0-5 Year UCITS ETF (GBP5.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

EFRN.L vs. GBP5.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EFRN.LGBP5.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.37

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.33

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.36

Drawdowns

EFRN.L vs. GBP5.L - Drawdown Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EFRN.LGBP5.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-17.31%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.45%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.48%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.31%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.26%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.44%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.15%

Volatility

EFRN.L vs. GBP5.L - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EFRN.LGBP5.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.81%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.92%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.18%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.61%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

6.58%

EFRN.L vs. GBP5.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

EFRN.L has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is higher than GBP5.L's 0.09% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

EFRN.L vs. GBP5.L - Dividend Comparison

EFRN.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while GBP5.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.58%.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020
EFRN.L
iShares EUR Floating Rate Bond ESG UCITS ETF EUR (Dist)
0.00%1.59%4.22%2.93%0.00%0.00%0.00%
GBP5.L
L&G ESG GBP Corporate Bond 0-5 Year UCITS ETF
4.58%4.40%3.78%2.56%1.05%0.32%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


EFRN.L and GBP5.L have a correlation of -0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, GBP5.L is cheaper at 0.09% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

GBP5.L is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.10% for EFRN.L.

EFRN.L tracks Bloomberg Euro Agg Corp 1-3 Yr TR EUR, while GBP5.L tracks Markit iBoxx GBP NonGilts 1-5 TR. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Legal & General. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for EFRN.L and 0.09% for GBP5.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EFRN.L and GBP5.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer