PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EFRN.DE vs. QDVL.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EFRN.DE vs. QDVL.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in iShares EUR Floating Rate Bond ESG UCITS ETF EUR (Dist) (EFRN.DE) and iShares EUR Corporate Bond 0-3yr ESG UCITS ETF EUR (Dist) (QDVL.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EFRN.DE achieves a 0.87% return, which is significantly higher than QDVL.DE's 0.74% return.


EFRN.DE

1D
0.05%
1M
0.17%
YTD
0.87%
6M
1.29%
1Y
2.55%
3Y*
3.61%
5Y*
2.35%
10Y*

QDVL.DE

1D
0.04%
1M
0.17%
YTD
0.74%
6M
0.78%
1Y
1.97%
3Y*
3.75%
5Y*
1.61%
10Y*
0.90%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EFRN.DE vs. QDVL.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
EFRN.DE
iShares EUR Floating Rate Bond ESG UCITS ETF EUR (Dist)
0.87%2.94%4.31%3.97%-0.03%-0.22%-0.04%1.18%-0.78%
QDVL.DE
iShares EUR Corporate Bond 0-3yr ESG UCITS ETF EUR (Dist)
0.74%2.81%4.24%4.30%-3.63%-0.34%0.56%0.80%-0.34%

Correlation

The correlation between EFRN.DE and QDVL.DE is -0.04, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.04

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.06

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.07

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 3, 2018

0.10

The correlation between EFRN.DE and QDVL.DE shifts across timeframes, from -0.04 (1 year) to 0.10 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EFRN.DE vs. QDVL.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EFRN.DE
EFRN.DE Risk / Return Rank: 9090
Overall Rank
EFRN.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EFRN.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
EFRN.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
EFRN.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
EFRN.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank

QDVL.DE
QDVL.DE Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
QDVL.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QDVL.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
QDVL.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
QDVL.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 4242
Calmar Ratio Rank
QDVL.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EFRN.DE vs. QDVL.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares EUR Floating Rate Bond ESG UCITS ETF EUR (Dist) (EFRN.DE) and iShares EUR Corporate Bond 0-3yr ESG UCITS ETF EUR (Dist) (QDVL.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EFRN.DEQDVL.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.93

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.41

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.55

1.33

+0.21

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

8.25

2.08

+6.17

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

32.61

8.99

+23.62

EFRN.DE vs. QDVL.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EFRN.DE Sharpe Ratio is 2.58, which is higher than the QDVL.DE Sharpe Ratio of 1.65. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EFRN.DE and QDVL.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EFRN.DEQDVL.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.58

1.65

+0.93

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

2.35

1.01

+1.34

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.31

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.12

0.32

+0.80

Drawdowns

EFRN.DE vs. QDVL.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EFRN.DE drawdown since its inception was -5.68%, smaller than the maximum QDVL.DE drawdown of -8.22%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EFRN.DE and QDVL.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EFRN.DEQDVL.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-5.68%

-8.22%

+2.54%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.31%

-0.93%

+0.62%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-0.48%

-0.93%

+0.45%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-1.13%

-4.90%

+3.77%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-8.22%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.01%

-0.01%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.33%

-0.71%

+0.38%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.08%

0.22%

-0.14%

Volatility

EFRN.DE vs. QDVL.DE - Volatility Comparison

iShares EUR Floating Rate Bond ESG UCITS ETF EUR (Dist) (EFRN.DE) and iShares EUR Corporate Bond 0-3yr ESG UCITS ETF EUR (Dist) (QDVL.DE) have volatilities of 0.34% and 0.34%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EFRN.DEQDVL.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.34%

0.34%

0.00%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

0.80%

1.02%

-0.22%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.98%

1.18%

-0.20%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

0.99%

1.58%

-0.59%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

1.35%

2.86%

-1.51%

EFRN.DE vs. QDVL.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

EFRN.DE has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than QDVL.DE's 0.12% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

EFRN.DE vs. QDVL.DE - Dividend Comparison

EFRN.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.50%, less than QDVL.DE's 2.91% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
EFRN.DE
iShares EUR Floating Rate Bond ESG UCITS ETF EUR (Dist)
2.50%2.88%4.22%2.93%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
QDVL.DE
iShares EUR Corporate Bond 0-3yr ESG UCITS ETF EUR (Dist)
2.91%3.04%2.95%1.95%0.31%0.13%0.23%0.27%0.13%0.12%0.17%

Frequently Asked Questions


EFRN.DE and QDVL.DE have a correlation of -0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, EFRN.DE is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

EFRN.DE is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.12% for QDVL.DE.

EFRN.DE tracks Bloomberg Euro Agg Corp 1-3 Yr TR EUR, while QDVL.DE tracks Bloomberg MSCI Euro Corporate 0-3 Sustainable SRI. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for EFRN.DE and 0.12% for QDVL.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EFRN.DE and QDVL.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer