EFRN.DE vs. PRAC.DE
EFRN.DE (iShares EUR Floating Rate Bond ESG UCITS ETF EUR (Dist)) and PRAC.DE (Invesco Preferred Shares UCITS ETF A) are both European Corporate Bonds funds - EFRN.DE tracks the Bloomberg Euro Agg Corp 1-3 Yr TR EUR while PRAC.DE tracks the Bloomberg Euro Corp TR EUR. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, EFRN.DE returned 2.35%/yr vs -0.04%/yr for PRAC.DE. At a 0.07 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. EFRN.DE charges 0.10%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for PRAC.DE.
Performance
EFRN.DE vs. PRAC.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EFRN.DE achieves a 0.87% return, which is significantly higher than PRAC.DE's 0.60% return.
EFRN.DE
- 1D
- 0.05%
- 1M
- 0.17%
- YTD
- 0.87%
- 6M
- 1.29%
- 1Y
- 2.55%
- 3Y*
- 3.61%
- 5Y*
- 2.35%
- 10Y*
- —
PRAC.DE
- 1D
- 0.12%
- 1M
- 0.31%
- YTD
- 0.60%
- 6M
- 0.63%
- 1Y
- 2.36%
- 3Y*
- 4.57%
- 5Y*
- -0.04%
- 10Y*
- —
EFRN.DE vs. PRAC.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EFRN.DE iShares EUR Floating Rate Bond ESG UCITS ETF EUR (Dist) | 0.87% | 2.94% | 4.31% | 3.97% | -0.03% | -0.22% | -0.05% |
PRAC.DE Invesco Preferred Shares UCITS ETF A | 0.60% | 3.03% | 4.31% | 7.53% | -13.95% | -1.04% | 1.51% |
Correlation
The correlation between EFRN.DE and PRAC.DE is 0.01, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.01 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.04 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.06 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 29, 2020 | 0.07 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EFRN.DE vs. PRAC.DE — Risk / Return Rank
EFRN.DE
PRAC.DE
EFRN.DE vs. PRAC.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares EUR Floating Rate Bond ESG UCITS ETF EUR (Dist) (EFRN.DE) and Invesco Preferred Shares UCITS ETF A (PRAC.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EFRN.DE | PRAC.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.95 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +3.01 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.55 | 1.12 | +0.43 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 8.25 | 0.76 | +7.49 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 32.61 | 2.65 | +29.96 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EFRN.DE | PRAC.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.58 | 0.63 | +1.95 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 2.35 | -0.01 | +2.35 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.12 | 0.02 | +1.11 |
Drawdowns
EFRN.DE vs. PRAC.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EFRN.DE drawdown since its inception was -5.68%, smaller than the maximum PRAC.DE drawdown of -17.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EFRN.DE and PRAC.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EFRN.DE | PRAC.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -5.68% | -17.86% | +12.18% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -0.31% | -2.70% | +2.39% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -0.48% | -2.70% | +2.22% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -1.13% | -17.86% | +16.73% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.01% | -1.69% | +1.68% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.33% | -6.27% | +5.94% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.08% | 0.78% | -0.70% |
Volatility
EFRN.DE vs. PRAC.DE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares EUR Floating Rate Bond ESG UCITS ETF EUR (Dist) (EFRN.DE) is 0.34%, while Invesco Preferred Shares UCITS ETF A (PRAC.DE) has a volatility of 0.99%. This indicates that EFRN.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PRAC.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EFRN.DE | PRAC.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.34% | 0.99% | -0.65% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 0.80% | 2.77% | -1.97% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.98% | 3.26% | -2.28% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 0.99% | 4.55% | -3.56% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 1.35% | 4.73% | -3.38% |
EFRN.DE vs. PRAC.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
EFRN.DE has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than PRAC.DE's 0.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
EFRN.DE vs. PRAC.DE - Dividend Comparison
EFRN.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.50%, while PRAC.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EFRN.DE iShares EUR Floating Rate Bond ESG UCITS ETF EUR (Dist) | 2.50% | 2.88% | 4.22% | 2.93% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PRAC.DE Invesco Preferred Shares UCITS ETF A | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EFRN.DE and PRAC.DE have a correlation of 0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, EFRN.DE is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
EFRN.DE is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for PRAC.DE.
EFRN.DE tracks Bloomberg Euro Agg Corp 1-3 Yr TR EUR, while PRAC.DE tracks Bloomberg Euro Corp TR EUR. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for EFRN.DE and 0.50% for PRAC.DE.
Find the right allocation for EFRN.DE and PRAC.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer