PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EFQ8.DE vs. EFRN.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EFQ8.DE vs. EFRN.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Deka iBoxx EUR Liquid Non-Financials Diversified UCITS ETF (EFQ8.DE) and iShares EUR Floating Rate Bond ESG UCITS ETF EUR (Dist) (EFRN.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EFQ8.DE achieves a -0.06% return, which is significantly lower than EFRN.DE's 1.42% return.


EFQ8.DE

1D
0.00%
1M
-0.82%
6M
-0.55%
YTD
-0.06%
1Y
0.65%
3Y*
3.44%
5Y*
-1.07%
10Y*
0.12%

EFRN.DE

1D
0.00%
1M
0.40%
6M
1.42%
YTD
1.42%
1Y
2.72%
3Y*
3.61%
5Y*
2.43%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EFQ8.DE vs. EFRN.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
EFQ8.DE
Deka iBoxx EUR Liquid Non-Financials Diversified UCITS ETF
-0.06%2.57%2.98%7.44%-15.12%-1.44%2.82%7.39%-1.29%
EFRN.DE
iShares EUR Floating Rate Bond ESG UCITS ETF EUR (Dist)
1.42%2.91%4.29%4.00%-0.00%-0.20%0.00%1.01%-0.80%

Correlation

The correlation between EFQ8.DE and EFRN.DE is -0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.02

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.04

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.03

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 27, 2018

0.03

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EFQ8.DE vs. EFRN.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EFQ8.DE
EFQ8.DE Risk / Return Rank: 1313
Overall Rank
EFQ8.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1313
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EFQ8.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 1111
Sortino Ratio Rank
EFQ8.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 1111
Omega Ratio Rank
EFQ8.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 1313
Calmar Ratio Rank
EFQ8.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 1414
Martin Ratio Rank

EFRN.DE
EFRN.DE Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
EFRN.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EFRN.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 7474
Sortino Ratio Rank
EFRN.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
EFRN.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
EFRN.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EFQ8.DE vs. EFRN.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Deka iBoxx EUR Liquid Non-Financials Diversified UCITS ETF (EFQ8.DE) and iShares EUR Floating Rate Bond ESG UCITS ETF EUR (Dist) (EFRN.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


EFQ8.DEEFRN.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.50

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.33

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.03

1.49

-0.46

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.21

7.30

-7.09

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.61

28.16

-27.55

EFQ8.DE vs. EFRN.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EFQ8.DE Sharpe Ratio is 0.16, which is lower than the EFRN.DE Sharpe Ratio of 1.66. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EFQ8.DE and EFRN.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

EFQ8.DE vs. EFRN.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EFQ8.DE drawdown since its inception was -19.42%, which is greater than EFRN.DE's maximum drawdown of -5.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EFQ8.DE and EFRN.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EFQ8.DEEFRN.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-19.42%

-5.58%

-13.84%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.12%

-0.37%

-2.75%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-3.12%

-0.39%

-2.73%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.42%

-1.20%

-18.22%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-19.42%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.98%

0.00%

-5.98%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.26%

-0.29%

-3.97%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.07%

0.10%

+0.97%

Volatility

EFQ8.DE vs. EFRN.DE - Volatility Comparison

Deka iBoxx EUR Liquid Non-Financials Diversified UCITS ETF (EFQ8.DE) has a higher volatility of 1.01% compared to iShares EUR Floating Rate Bond ESG UCITS ETF EUR (Dist) (EFRN.DE) at 0.49%. This indicates that EFQ8.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EFRN.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EFQ8.DEEFRN.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.01%

0.49%

+0.52%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.51%

1.13%

+2.38%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.08%

1.63%

+2.45%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.90%

1.46%

+4.44%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.36%

1.71%

+3.65%

EFQ8.DE vs. EFRN.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

EFQ8.DE has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than EFRN.DE's 0.10% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

EFQ8.DE vs. EFRN.DE - Dividend Comparison

EFQ8.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.57%, more than EFRN.DE's 2.48% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EFQ8.DE
Deka iBoxx EUR Liquid Non-Financials Diversified UCITS ETF
3.57%3.18%2.61%2.33%1.18%0.92%0.90%0.96%0.67%1.17%1.70%2.59%
EFRN.DE
iShares EUR Floating Rate Bond ESG UCITS ETF EUR (Dist)
2.48%2.88%4.22%2.93%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


EFQ8.DE and EFRN.DE have a correlation of -0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, EFRN.DE is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

EFRN.DE is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for EFQ8.DE.

EFQ8.DE tracks iBoxx® EUR Liquid Non-Financials Diversified, while EFRN.DE tracks Bloomberg Euro Agg Corp 1-3 Yr TR EUR. They also come from different issuers: Deka and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for EFQ8.DE and 0.10% for EFRN.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EFQ8.DE and EFRN.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer