EFCNX vs. BBLIX
EFCNX (Emerald Insights Fund) and BBLIX (BBH Select Series - Large Cap Fund) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds. Over the past 5 years, EFCNX returned 10.67%/yr vs 8.27%/yr for BBLIX. A 0.78 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. EFCNX charges 1.40%/yr vs 0.70%/yr for BBLIX.
Performance
EFCNX vs. BBLIX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
EFCNX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.00%
- YTD
- 0.00%
- 6M
- 0.00%
- 1Y
- 26.89%
- 3Y*
- 21.89%
- 5Y*
- 10.67%
- 10Y*
- 16.46%
BBLIX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.00%
- YTD
- 1.58%
- 6M
- 1.58%
- 1Y
- 8.17%
- 3Y*
- 13.79%
- 5Y*
- 8.27%
- 10Y*
- —
EFCNX vs. BBLIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EFCNX Emerald Insights Fund | 0.00% | 28.71% | 25.88% | 40.82% | -31.09% | 22.95% | 49.60% | 9.39% |
BBLIX BBH Select Series - Large Cap Fund | 1.58% | 12.07% | 15.83% | 23.86% | -20.59% | 27.23% | 12.30% | 3.63% |
Correlation
The correlation between EFCNX and BBLIX is 0.48, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.48 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.71 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.79 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 13, 2019 | 0.78 |
Over the past year, the correlation between EFCNX and BBLIX has dropped to 0.48 - well below their long-term average of 0.78, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EFCNX vs. BBLIX — Risk / Return Rank
EFCNX
BBLIX
EFCNX vs. BBLIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Emerald Insights Fund (EFCNX) and BBH Select Series - Large Cap Fund (BBLIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EFCNX | BBLIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.34 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +3.95 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 2.56 | 1.31 | +1.25 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 11.50 | 2.89 | +8.61 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 66.02 | 5.53 | +60.49 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EFCNX | BBLIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.67 | 1.33 | +2.34 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.48 | 0.54 | -0.06 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.74 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.63 | 0.57 | +0.06 |
Drawdowns
EFCNX vs. BBLIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EFCNX drawdown since its inception was -38.34%, which is greater than BBLIX's maximum drawdown of -33.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EFCNX and BBLIX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EFCNX | BBLIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -38.34% | -33.49% | -4.85% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.90% | -3.63% | +0.73% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -27.61% | -14.68% | -12.93% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -38.34% | -28.06% | -10.28% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -38.34% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -1.80% | +1.80% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.64% | -6.35% | -2.29% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.93% | 2.43% | -1.50% |
Volatility
EFCNX vs. BBLIX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Emerald Insights Fund (EFCNX) is 0.00%, while BBH Select Series - Large Cap Fund (BBLIX) has a volatility of 0.00%. This indicates that EFCNX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BBLIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EFCNX | BBLIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 0.00% | 4.75% | -4.75% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 9.18% | 7.86% | +1.32% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.89% | 15.93% | +6.96% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.80% | 18.55% | +4.25% |
EFCNX vs. BBLIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
EFCNX has a 1.40% expense ratio, which is higher than BBLIX's 0.70% expense ratio.
Dividends
EFCNX vs. BBLIX - Dividend Comparison
EFCNX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.50%, less than BBLIX's 9.39% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BBLIX BBH Select Series - Large Cap Fund | 9.39% | 9.54% | 4.20% | 0.28% | 1.45% | 3.27% | 0.34% | 0.04% | 0.00% |
EFCNX Emerald Insights Fund | 8.50% | 8.50% | 1.27% | 0.00% | 5.41% | 15.80% | 9.41% | 0.04% | 27.51% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EFCNX and BBLIX have a correlation of 0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BBLIX has higher volatility (0.00%) compared to EFCNX (0.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EFCNX dropped -38.34% vs BBLIX's -33.49%.
EFCNX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.67 vs 1.33), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for EFCNX and BBLIX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer