EFAA vs. OMAH

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

EFAA (Invesco MSCI EAFE Income Advantage ETF) and OMAH (VistaShares Target 15™ Berkshire Select Income ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, EFAA returned 18.26% vs 11.44% for OMAH. At a 0.48 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. EFAA charges 0.39%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for OMAH.

Performance

EFAA vs. OMAH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco MSCI EAFE Income Advantage ETF (EFAA) and VistaShares Target 15™ Berkshire Select Income ETF (OMAH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EFAA achieves a 5.70% return, which is significantly higher than OMAH's 4.56% return.

EFAA

• 1D: -0.42%
• 1M: 2.87%
• YTD: 5.70%
• 6M: 8.09%
• 1Y: 18.26%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

OMAH

• 1D: -0.70%
• 1M: 0.44%
• YTD: 4.56%
• 6M: 4.00%
• 1Y: 11.44%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EFAA vs. OMAH - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
EFAA Invesco MSCI EAFE Income Advantage ETF	5.70%	16.03%
OMAH VistaShares Target 15™ Berkshire Select Income ETF	4.56%	6.74%

Correlation

The correlation between EFAA and OMAH is 0.41, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.41
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 6, 2025	0.48

EFAA vs. OMAH - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	EFAA	OMAH
Financial Services	24.5%	38.9%
Industrials	20.0%	-
Healthcare	10.5%	7.0%
Technology	10.4%	13.6%
Consumer Cyclical	7.6%	4.1%
Consumer Defensive	6.8%	16.2%
Basic Materials	5.9%	-
Communication Services	4.5%	9.8%
Energy	4.0%	10.5%
Utilities	3.9%	-
Real Estate	1.9%	-

Return for Risk

EFAA vs. OMAH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EFAA

EFAA Risk / Return Rank: 41
EFAA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 43
EFAA Sortino Ratio Rank: 43
EFAA Omega Ratio Rank: 43
EFAA Calmar Ratio Rank: 36
EFAA Martin Ratio Rank: 42

OMAH

OMAH Risk / Return Rank: 49
OMAH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 39
OMAH Sortino Ratio Rank: 38
OMAH Omega Ratio Rank: 37
OMAH Calmar Ratio Rank: 75
OMAH Martin Ratio Rank: 54

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EFAA vs. OMAH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco MSCI EAFE Income Advantage ETF (EFAA) and VistaShares Target 15™ Berkshire Select Income ETF (OMAH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	EFAA	OMAH	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.54	1.43	+0.11
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.17	2.02	+0.16
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.28	1.25	+0.03
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.81	3.82	-2.01
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	7.00	9.48	-2.48
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

EFAA vs. OMAH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EFAA Sharpe Ratio is 1.54, which is comparable to the OMAH Sharpe Ratio of 1.43. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EFAA and OMAH, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	EFAA	OMAH	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.54	1.43	+0.11
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.11	0.70	+0.41

Drawdowns

EFAA vs. OMAH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EFAA drawdown since its inception was -11.97%, roughly equal to the maximum OMAH drawdown of -11.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EFAA and OMAH.

Drawdown Indicators

	EFAA	OMAH	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-11.97%	-11.83%	-0.14%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.14%	-3.00%	-7.14%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.22%	-2.65%	+1.43%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.04%	-1.26%	-0.78%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.61%	1.21%	+1.40%

Volatility

EFAA vs. OMAH - Volatility Comparison

Invesco MSCI EAFE Income Advantage ETF (EFAA) has a higher volatility of 3.54% compared to VistaShares Target 15™ Berkshire Select Income ETF (OMAH) at 1.93%. This indicates that EFAA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than OMAH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	EFAA	OMAH	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.54%	1.93%	+1.61%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.72%	5.49%	+4.23%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.96%	8.05%	+3.91%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	12.96%	13.21%	-0.25%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	12.96%	13.21%	-0.25%

EFAA vs. OMAH - Expense Ratio Comparison

EFAA has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is lower than OMAH's 0.95% expense ratio.

Dividends

EFAA vs. OMAH - Dividend Comparison

EFAA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.13%, less than OMAH's 15.44% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
EFAA Invesco MSCI EAFE Income Advantage ETF	8.13%	7.94%	3.29%
OMAH VistaShares Target 15™ Berkshire Select Income ETF	15.44%	12.86%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both EFAA and OMAH in my portfolio?

EFAA and OMAH have a correlation of 0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, EFAA or OMAH?

EFAA has higher volatility (3.54%) compared to OMAH (1.93%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EFAA dropped -11.97% vs OMAH's -11.83%.

Which ETF is better, EFAA or OMAH?

On 1-year performance, EFAA leads with 18.26% vs 11.44% for OMAH. On fees, EFAA is cheaper at 0.39% per year. On volatility, OMAH has been the lower-risk option at 1.93%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, EFAA or OMAH?

Over the 1-year period, EFAA has performed better with a 18.26% return vs 11.44%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, EFAA or OMAH?

EFAA is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for OMAH.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, EFAA or OMAH?

OMAH has the higher dividend yield at 15.44%, compared with 8.13% for EFAA.

What is the main difference between EFAA and OMAH?

They also come from different issuers: Invesco and VistaShares. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for EFAA and 0.95% for OMAH.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

EFAA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.54 vs 1.43), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.