EFAA vs. NVDA

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

EFAA (Invesco MSCI EAFE Income Advantage ETF) is Derivative Income fund actively managed by Invesco, while NVDA (NVIDIA Corporation) is a stock. Over the past year, EFAA returned 18.26% vs 52.10% for NVDA. At a 0.39 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

EFAA vs. NVDA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco MSCI EAFE Income Advantage ETF (EFAA) and NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EFAA achieves a 5.70% return, which is significantly lower than NVDA's 15.15% return.

EFAA

• 1D: -0.42%
• 1M: 2.87%
• YTD: 5.70%
• 6M: 8.09%
• 1Y: 18.26%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

NVDA

• 1D: -3.62%
• 1M: 8.20%
• YTD: 15.15%
• 6M: 19.59%
• 1Y: 52.10%
• 3Y*: 76.15%
• 5Y*: 65.05%
• 10Y*: 68.84%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EFAA vs. NVDA - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
EFAA Invesco MSCI EAFE Income Advantage ETF	5.70%	25.80%	-3.30%
NVDA NVIDIA Corporation	15.15%	38.92%	13.83%

Correlation

The correlation between EFAA and NVDA is 0.36, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.36
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 18, 2024	0.39

Return for Risk

EFAA vs. NVDA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EFAA

EFAA Risk / Return Rank: 41
EFAA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 43
EFAA Sortino Ratio Rank: 43
EFAA Omega Ratio Rank: 43
EFAA Calmar Ratio Rank: 36
EFAA Martin Ratio Rank: 42

NVDA

NVDA Risk / Return Rank: 78
NVDA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 81
NVDA Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
NVDA Omega Ratio Rank: 73
NVDA Calmar Ratio Rank: 79
NVDA Martin Ratio Rank: 79

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EFAA vs. NVDA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco MSCI EAFE Income Advantage ETF (EFAA) and NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	EFAA	NVDA	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.54	1.53	0.00
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.17	2.15	+0.03
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.28	1.26	+0.02
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.81	2.59	-0.78
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	7.00	6.36	+0.64
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

EFAA vs. NVDA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EFAA Sharpe Ratio is 1.54, which is comparable to the NVDA Sharpe Ratio of 1.53. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EFAA and NVDA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	EFAA	NVDA	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.54	1.53	0.00
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	1.27	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	1.39	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.11	0.63	+0.48

Drawdowns

EFAA vs. NVDA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EFAA drawdown since its inception was -11.97%, smaller than the maximum NVDA drawdown of -89.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EFAA and NVDA.

Drawdown Indicators

	EFAA	NVDA	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-11.97%	-89.72%	+77.75%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.14%	-20.21%	+10.07%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-36.88%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-66.34%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-66.34%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.22%	-8.90%	+7.68%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.04%	-36.21%	+34.17%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.61%	8.21%	-5.60%

Volatility

EFAA vs. NVDA - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco MSCI EAFE Income Advantage ETF (EFAA) is 3.54%, while NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) has a volatility of 12.53%. This indicates that EFAA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NVDA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	EFAA	NVDA	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.54%	12.53%	-8.99%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.72%	25.54%	-15.82%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.96%	34.22%	-22.26%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	12.96%	51.69%	-38.73%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	12.96%	49.80%	-36.84%

Dividends

EFAA vs. NVDA - Dividend Comparison

EFAA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.13%, more than NVDA's 0.02% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
EFAA Invesco MSCI EAFE Income Advantage ETF	8.13%	7.94%	3.29%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
NVDA NVIDIA Corporation	0.02%	0.02%	0.03%	0.03%	0.11%	0.05%	0.12%	0.27%	0.46%	0.29%	0.45%	1.20%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both EFAA and NVDA in my portfolio?

EFAA and NVDA have a correlation of 0.36, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, EFAA or NVDA?

NVDA has higher volatility (12.53%) compared to EFAA (3.54%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EFAA dropped -11.97% vs NVDA's -89.72%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

EFAA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.54 vs 1.53), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.