PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EFAA vs. NVDA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EFAA vs. NVDA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco MSCI EAFE Income Advantage ETF (EFAA) and NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EFAA achieves a 6.18% return, which is significantly lower than NVDA's 7.39% return.


EFAA

1D
-1.40%
1M
0.47%
YTD
6.18%
6M
6.02%
1Y
18.90%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

NVDA

1D
-4.13%
1M
-6.99%
YTD
7.39%
6M
5.85%
1Y
38.94%
3Y*
68.08%
5Y*
59.90%
10Y*
67.94%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EFAA vs. NVDA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
EFAA
Invesco MSCI EAFE Income Advantage ETF
6.18%25.80%-3.61%
NVDA
NVIDIA Corporation
7.39%38.92%6.29%

Correlation

The correlation between EFAA and NVDA is 0.38, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.38

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 17, 2024

0.41

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EFAA vs. NVDA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EFAA
EFAA Risk / Return Rank: 4444
Overall Rank
EFAA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EFAA Sortino Ratio Rank: 4646
Sortino Ratio Rank
EFAA Omega Ratio Rank: 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
EFAA Calmar Ratio Rank: 3939
Calmar Ratio Rank
EFAA Martin Ratio Rank: 4545
Martin Ratio Rank

NVDA
NVDA Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
NVDA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NVDA Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
NVDA Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
NVDA Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
NVDA Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EFAA vs. NVDA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco MSCI EAFE Income Advantage ETF (EFAA) and NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


EFAANVDADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.43

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.52

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.20

+0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.87

1.94

-0.06

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.22

4.51

+2.71

EFAA vs. NVDA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EFAA Sharpe Ratio is 1.53, which is higher than the NVDA Sharpe Ratio of 1.10. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EFAA and NVDA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

EFAA vs. NVDA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EFAA drawdown since its inception was -11.97%, smaller than the maximum NVDA drawdown of -89.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EFAA and NVDA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EFAANVDADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-11.97%

-89.72%

+77.75%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.14%

-20.21%

+10.07%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-36.88%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-66.34%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-66.34%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.41%

-15.04%

+13.63%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.02%

-36.16%

+34.14%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.62%

8.66%

-6.04%

Volatility

EFAA vs. NVDA - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco MSCI EAFE Income Advantage ETF (EFAA) is 4.18%, while NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) has a volatility of 13.29%. This indicates that EFAA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NVDA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EFAANVDADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.18%

13.29%

-9.11%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.42%

26.92%

-16.50%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.44%

35.50%

-23.06%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.10%

51.84%

-38.74%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.10%

49.87%

-36.77%

Dividends

EFAA vs. NVDA - Dividend Comparison

EFAA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.23%, more than NVDA's 0.14% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EFAA
Invesco MSCI EAFE Income Advantage ETF
8.23%7.94%3.29%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
NVDA
NVIDIA Corporation
0.14%0.02%0.03%0.03%0.11%0.05%0.12%0.27%0.46%0.29%0.45%1.20%

Frequently Asked Questions


EFAA and NVDA have a correlation of 0.38, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NVDA has higher volatility (13.29%) compared to EFAA (4.18%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EFAA dropped -11.97% vs NVDA's -89.72%.

EFAA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.53 vs 1.10), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EFAA and NVDA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer