PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EEXF.L vs. SUKC.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EEXF.L vs. SUKC.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in iShares € Corp Bond ex-Financials UCITS ETF EUR (Dist) (EEXF.L) and SPDR Bloomberg 0-5 Year Sterling Corporate Bond UCITS ETF (SUKC.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EEXF.L achieves a -3.85% return, which is significantly lower than SUKC.L's 1.17% return. Over the past 10 years, EEXF.L has underperformed SUKC.L with an annualized return of 0.60%, while SUKC.L has yielded a comparatively higher 2.28% annualized return.


EEXF.L

1D
-0.68%
1M
-2.20%
6M
-3.46%
YTD
-3.85%
1Y
-2.30%
3Y*
3.04%
5Y*
-0.93%
10Y*
0.60%

SUKC.L

1D
0.10%
1M
0.17%
6M
1.45%
YTD
1.17%
1Y
3.47%
3Y*
6.35%
5Y*
2.51%
10Y*
2.28%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EEXF.L vs. SUKC.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
EEXF.L
iShares € Corp Bond ex-Financials UCITS ETF EUR (Dist)
-3.85%7.88%-1.05%5.23%-8.74%-7.78%8.67%1.04%-0.32%5.14%
SUKC.L
SPDR Bloomberg 0-5 Year Sterling Corporate Bond UCITS ETF
1.17%6.37%4.84%7.17%-5.78%-0.79%3.08%4.66%-0.45%1.76%

Correlation

The correlation between EEXF.L and SUKC.L is 0.15, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.15

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.24

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.33

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.29

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 17, 2014

0.30

The correlation between EEXF.L and SUKC.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.15 (1 year) to 0.33 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EEXF.L vs. SUKC.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EEXF.L
EEXF.L Risk / Return Rank: 55
Overall Rank
EEXF.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EEXF.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
Sortino Ratio Rank
EEXF.L Omega Ratio Rank: 55
Omega Ratio Rank
EEXF.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
Calmar Ratio Rank
EEXF.L Martin Ratio Rank: 55
Martin Ratio Rank

SUKC.L
SUKC.L Risk / Return Rank: 2626
Overall Rank
SUKC.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2020
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SUKC.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 1818
Sortino Ratio Rank
SUKC.L Omega Ratio Rank: 2020
Omega Ratio Rank
SUKC.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 3939
Calmar Ratio Rank
SUKC.L Martin Ratio Rank: 3333
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EEXF.L vs. SUKC.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares € Corp Bond ex-Financials UCITS ETF EUR (Dist) (EEXF.L) and SPDR Bloomberg 0-5 Year Sterling Corporate Bond UCITS ETF (SUKC.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


EEXF.LSUKC.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.10

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.52

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.92

1.12

-0.20

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.48

1.67

-2.15

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.98

4.02

-4.99

EEXF.L vs. SUKC.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EEXF.L Sharpe Ratio is -0.51, which is lower than the SUKC.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.58. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EEXF.L and SUKC.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

EEXF.L vs. SUKC.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EEXF.L drawdown since its inception was -21.79%, which is greater than SUKC.L's maximum drawdown of -11.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EEXF.L and SUKC.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EEXF.LSUKC.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-21.79%

-11.60%

-10.19%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.22%

-2.07%

-3.15%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.22%

-2.07%

-3.15%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.09%

-11.60%

-5.49%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-21.79%

-11.60%

-10.19%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-10.99%

-0.41%

-10.58%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.24%

-1.30%

-6.94%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.56%

0.86%

+1.70%

Volatility

EEXF.L vs. SUKC.L - Volatility Comparison

iShares € Corp Bond ex-Financials UCITS ETF EUR (Dist) (EEXF.L) has a higher volatility of 1.22% compared to SPDR Bloomberg 0-5 Year Sterling Corporate Bond UCITS ETF (SUKC.L) at 1.05%. This indicates that EEXF.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SUKC.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EEXF.LSUKC.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.22%

1.05%

+0.17%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.02%

3.31%

+0.71%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.88%

5.94%

-1.06%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.29%

4.56%

+1.73%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

7.36%

4.53%

+2.83%

EEXF.L vs. SUKC.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both EEXF.L and SUKC.L have an expense ratio of 0.20%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

EEXF.L vs. SUKC.L - Dividend Comparison

EEXF.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.85%, less than SUKC.L's 4.67% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EEXF.L
iShares € Corp Bond ex-Financials UCITS ETF EUR (Dist)
2.85%2.59%2.30%1.49%0.86%0.84%0.86%1.31%1.34%1.40%1.70%1.00%
SUKC.L
SPDR Bloomberg 0-5 Year Sterling Corporate Bond UCITS ETF
4.67%4.61%4.41%3.05%1.76%1.77%1.97%1.93%1.88%2.43%2.40%2.55%

Frequently Asked Questions


EEXF.L and SUKC.L have a correlation of 0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Both ETFs have the same 0.20% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

EEXF.L and SUKC.L have the same expense ratio: 0.20% per year.

EEXF.L tracks Bloomberg Euro Corporate ex-Financials Bond Index (EUR), while SUKC.L tracks Markit iBoxx GBP NonGilts 1-5 TR. They also come from different issuers: iShares and State Street.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EEXF.L and SUKC.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer