PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EEXF.L vs. IS15.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EEXF.L vs. IS15.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in iShares € Corp Bond ex-Financials UCITS ETF EUR (Dist) (EEXF.L) and iShares GBP Corporate Bond 0-5yr UCITS ETF (IS15.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EEXF.L achieves a -3.85% return, which is significantly lower than IS15.L's 1.00% return. Over the past 10 years, EEXF.L has underperformed IS15.L with an annualized return of 0.60%, while IS15.L has yielded a comparatively higher 2.24% annualized return.


EEXF.L

1D
-0.68%
1M
-2.20%
6M
-3.46%
YTD
-3.85%
1Y
-2.30%
3Y*
3.04%
5Y*
-0.93%
10Y*
0.60%

IS15.L

1D
-0.05%
1M
-0.08%
6M
0.70%
YTD
1.00%
1Y
3.87%
3Y*
6.31%
5Y*
2.40%
10Y*
2.24%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EEXF.L vs. IS15.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
EEXF.L
iShares € Corp Bond ex-Financials UCITS ETF EUR (Dist)
-3.85%7.88%-1.05%5.23%-8.74%-7.78%8.67%1.04%-0.32%5.14%
IS15.L
iShares GBP Corporate Bond 0-5yr UCITS ETF
1.00%6.24%4.89%7.16%-6.09%-0.84%3.38%4.54%-0.48%1.76%

Correlation

The correlation between EEXF.L and IS15.L is 0.45, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.45

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.43

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.44

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.34

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 30, 2011

0.30

The correlation between EEXF.L and IS15.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.30 (all time) to 0.45 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EEXF.L vs. IS15.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EEXF.L
EEXF.L Risk / Return Rank: 55
Overall Rank
EEXF.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EEXF.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
Sortino Ratio Rank
EEXF.L Omega Ratio Rank: 55
Omega Ratio Rank
EEXF.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
Calmar Ratio Rank
EEXF.L Martin Ratio Rank: 55
Martin Ratio Rank

IS15.L
IS15.L Risk / Return Rank: 5353
Overall Rank
IS15.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5050
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IS15.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 5151
Sortino Ratio Rank
IS15.L Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
IS15.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 4848
Calmar Ratio Rank
IS15.L Martin Ratio Rank: 5555
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EEXF.L vs. IS15.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares € Corp Bond ex-Financials UCITS ETF EUR (Dist) (EEXF.L) and iShares GBP Corporate Bond 0-5yr UCITS ETF (IS15.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


EEXF.LIS15.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.95

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.73

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.92

1.29

-0.37

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.48

1.99

-2.47

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.98

7.57

-8.55

EEXF.L vs. IS15.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EEXF.L Sharpe Ratio is -0.51, which is lower than the IS15.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.44. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EEXF.L and IS15.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

EEXF.L vs. IS15.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EEXF.L drawdown since its inception was -21.79%, which is greater than IS15.L's maximum drawdown of -12.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EEXF.L and IS15.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EEXF.LIS15.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-21.79%

-12.18%

-9.61%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.22%

-1.94%

-3.28%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.22%

-1.94%

-3.28%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.09%

-12.18%

-4.91%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-21.79%

-12.18%

-9.61%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-10.99%

-0.44%

-10.55%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.24%

-1.12%

-7.12%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.56%

0.51%

+2.05%

Volatility

EEXF.L vs. IS15.L - Volatility Comparison

iShares € Corp Bond ex-Financials UCITS ETF EUR (Dist) (EEXF.L) has a higher volatility of 1.22% compared to iShares GBP Corporate Bond 0-5yr UCITS ETF (IS15.L) at 0.80%. This indicates that EEXF.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IS15.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EEXF.LIS15.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.22%

0.80%

+0.42%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.02%

2.44%

+1.58%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.88%

2.68%

+2.20%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.29%

3.32%

+2.97%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

7.36%

3.13%

+4.23%

EEXF.L vs. IS15.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both EEXF.L and IS15.L have an expense ratio of 0.20%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

EEXF.L vs. IS15.L - Dividend Comparison

EEXF.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.85%, less than IS15.L's 4.52% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EEXF.L
iShares € Corp Bond ex-Financials UCITS ETF EUR (Dist)
2.85%2.59%2.30%1.49%0.86%0.84%0.86%1.31%1.34%1.40%1.70%1.00%
IS15.L
iShares GBP Corporate Bond 0-5yr UCITS ETF
4.52%4.35%4.06%3.05%1.80%1.72%1.81%2.03%2.08%2.15%2.55%2.91%

Frequently Asked Questions


EEXF.L and IS15.L have a correlation of 0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Both ETFs have the same 0.20% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

EEXF.L and IS15.L have the same expense ratio: 0.20% per year.

EEXF.L tracks Bloomberg Euro Corporate ex-Financials Bond Index (EUR), while IS15.L tracks Markit iBoxx GBP NonGilts 1-5 TR.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EEXF.L and IS15.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer