EEWG.L vs. FLES.L
EEWG.L (iShares MSCI World ESG Enhanced UCITS ETF USD (Dist)) and FLES.L (Franklin Euro Short Maturity UCITS ETF EUR (Dist)) are both exchange-traded funds - EEWG.L is a Global Equities fund tracking the MSCI ACWI NR USD, while FLES.L is a Ultra Short-Term Bonds fund tracking the ICE BofA 0-1 Year Euro Broad Market Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, EEWG.L returned 10.59%/yr vs 2.02%/yr for FLES.L. At a 0.12 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. EEWG.L charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for FLES.L.
Performance
EEWG.L vs. FLES.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
EEWG.L is traded in GBP, while FLES.L is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the FLES.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EEWG.L achieves a 8.45% return, which is significantly higher than FLES.L's -1.65% return.
EEWG.L
- 1D
- -0.83%
- 1M
- -0.98%
- 6M
- 6.53%
- YTD
- 8.45%
- 1Y
- 18.91%
- 3Y*
- 15.96%
- 5Y*
- 10.59%
- 10Y*
- —
FLES.L
- 1D
- 0.16%
- 1M
- -1.74%
- 6M
- -1.15%
- YTD
- -1.65%
- 1Y
- 0.09%
- 3Y*
- 2.72%
- 5Y*
- 2.02%
- 10Y*
- —
EEWG.L vs. FLES.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EEWG.L iShares MSCI World ESG Enhanced UCITS ETF USD (Dist) | 8.45% | 10.99% | 20.26% | 16.47% | -10.69% | 24.36% | 13.71% | 1.01% |
FLES.L Franklin Euro Short Maturity UCITS ETF EUR (Dist) | -1.65% | 7.85% | -0.52% | 1.23% | 5.31% | -5.82% | 5.53% | -1.00% |
Correlation
The correlation between EEWG.L and FLES.L is 0.16, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.16 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.06 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.10 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 22, 2019 | 0.12 |
The correlation between EEWG.L and FLES.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.06 (3 years) to 0.16 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EEWG.L vs. FLES.L — Risk / Return Rank
EEWG.L
FLES.L
EEWG.L vs. FLES.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI World ESG Enhanced UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (EEWG.L) and Franklin Euro Short Maturity UCITS ETF EUR (Dist) (FLES.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| EEWG.L | FLES.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.72 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.41 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.33 | 1.01 | +0.32 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.67 | 0.03 | +2.64 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.45 | 0.07 | +10.38 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
EEWG.L vs. FLES.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EEWG.L drawdown since its inception was -25.43%, which is greater than FLES.L's maximum drawdown of -10.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EEWG.L and FLES.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EEWG.L | FLES.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -25.43% | -10.70% | -14.73% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.06% | -3.14% | -3.92% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.89% | -3.14% | -15.75% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.89% | -4.87% | -14.02% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.76% | -2.77% | +1.01% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.89% | -4.40% | +0.51% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.81% | 1.18% | +0.63% |
Volatility
EEWG.L vs. FLES.L - Volatility Comparison
iShares MSCI World ESG Enhanced UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (EEWG.L) has a higher volatility of 2.85% compared to Franklin Euro Short Maturity UCITS ETF EUR (Dist) (FLES.L) at 1.07%. This indicates that EEWG.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FLES.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EEWG.L | FLES.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.85% | 1.07% | +1.78% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.01% | 2.73% | +5.28% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.84% | 4.04% | +6.80% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.52% | 5.44% | +8.08% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.28% | 6.28% | +9.00% |
EEWG.L vs. FLES.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
EEWG.L has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than FLES.L's 0.15% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
EEWG.L vs. FLES.L - Dividend Comparison
EEWG.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.12%, less than FLES.L's 1.92% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EEWG.L iShares MSCI World ESG Enhanced UCITS ETF USD (Dist) | 1.12% | 1.18% | 1.36% | 1.59% | 1.78% | 1.28% | 1.43% | 0.76% |
FLES.L Franklin Euro Short Maturity UCITS ETF EUR (Dist) | 1.92% | 2.62% | 2.55% | 1.20% | 0.26% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EEWG.L and FLES.L have a correlation of 0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, FLES.L is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
FLES.L is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for EEWG.L.
EEWG.L is categorized as Global Equities, while FLES.L is Ultra Short-Term Bonds. EEWG.L tracks MSCI ACWI NR USD, while FLES.L tracks ICE BofA 0-1 Year Euro Broad Market Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Franklin. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for EEWG.L and 0.15% for FLES.L.
Find the right allocation for EEWG.L and FLES.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer