EEWG.L vs. BATG.L

Last updated Jul 18, 2026

EEWG.L (iShares MSCI World ESG Enhanced UCITS ETF USD (Dist)) and BATG.L (L&G Battery Value-Chain UCITS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - EEWG.L is a Global Equities fund tracking the MSCI ACWI NR USD, while BATG.L is a Lithium & Battery Metals fund tracking the Solactive Battery Value-Chain Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, EEWG.L returned 10.59%/yr vs 11.75%/yr for BATG.L. A 0.69 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. EEWG.L charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.49%/yr for BATG.L.

Performance

EEWG.L vs. BATG.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in iShares MSCI World ESG Enhanced UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (EEWG.L) and L&G Battery Value-Chain UCITS ETF (BATG.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Different Trading Currencies

EEWG.L is traded in GBP, while BATG.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the BATG.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EEWG.L achieves a 8.45% return, which is significantly higher than BATG.L's 5.24% return.

EEWG.L

• 1D: -0.83%
• 1M: -0.98%
• 6M: 6.53%
• YTD: 8.45%
• 1Y: 18.91%
• 3Y*: 15.96%
• 5Y*: 10.59%
• 10Y*: —

BATG.L

• 1D: -2.00%
• 1M: -19.03%
• 6M: -4.41%
• YTD: 5.24%
• 1Y: 57.66%
• 3Y*: 13.52%
• 5Y*: 11.75%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EEWG.L vs. BATG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
EEWG.L iShares MSCI World ESG Enhanced UCITS ETF USD (Dist)	8.45%	10.99%	20.26%	16.47%	-10.69%	24.36%	13.71%	1.01%
BATG.L L&G Battery Value-Chain UCITS ETF	5.24%	60.42%	0.47%	2.83%	-3.91%	17.00%	75.38%	2.50%

Correlation

The correlation between EEWG.L and BATG.L is 0.61, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.61
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.61
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.66
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 22, 2019	0.69

The correlation between EEWG.L and BATG.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.61 to 0.69 - a consistent structural relationship.

EEWG.L vs. BATG.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	EEWG.L	BATG.L
Technology	30.9%	18.6%
Financial Services	16.9%	-
Industrials	10.0%	30.7%
Healthcare	9.5%	-
Consumer Cyclical	8.6%	19.9%
Communication Services	8.6%	-
Consumer Defensive	4.5%	-
Energy	3.6%	-
Basic Materials	3.3%	24.8%
Utilities	2.5%	6.0%
Real Estate	1.9%	-

Return for Risk

EEWG.L vs. BATG.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EEWG.L

EEWG.L Risk / Return Rank: 73
EEWG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 72
EEWG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 71
EEWG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 73
EEWG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 71
EEWG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 76

BATG.L

BATG.L Risk / Return Rank: 68
BATG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 78
BATG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 69
BATG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 68
BATG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 60
BATG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 65

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EEWG.L vs. BATG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI World ESG Enhanced UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (EEWG.L) and L&G Battery Value-Chain UCITS ETF (BATG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	EEWG.L	BATG.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.75	1.89	-0.14
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.47	2.41	+0.06
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.33	1.31	+0.02
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.67	2.31	+0.36
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	10.45	8.63	+1.82

EEWG.L vs. BATG.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EEWG.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.75, which is comparable to the BATG.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.89. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EEWG.L and BATG.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

EEWG.L vs. BATG.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EEWG.L drawdown since its inception was -25.43%, smaller than the maximum BATG.L drawdown of -48.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EEWG.L and BATG.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	EEWG.L	BATG.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-25.43%	-48.11%	+22.68%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.06%	-24.87%	+17.81%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-18.89%	-34.36%	+15.47%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-18.89%	-34.36%	+15.47%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.76%	-24.87%	+23.11%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.89%	-17.03%	+13.14%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.81%	6.66%	-4.85%

Volatility

EEWG.L vs. BATG.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares MSCI World ESG Enhanced UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (EEWG.L) is 2.85%, while L&G Battery Value-Chain UCITS ETF (BATG.L) has a volatility of 9.97%. This indicates that EEWG.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BATG.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	EEWG.L	BATG.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.85%	9.97%	-7.12%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.01%	24.74%	-16.73%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	10.84%	30.50%	-19.66%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	13.52%	26.84%	-13.32%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	15.28%	27.27%	-11.99%

EEWG.L vs. BATG.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

EEWG.L has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than BATG.L's 0.49% expense ratio.

Dividends

EEWG.L vs. BATG.L - Dividend Comparison

EEWG.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.12%, while BATG.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
BATG.L L&G Battery Value-Chain UCITS ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
EEWG.L iShares MSCI World ESG Enhanced UCITS ETF USD (Dist)	1.12%	1.18%	1.36%	1.59%	1.78%	1.28%	1.43%	0.76%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both EEWG.L and BATG.L in my portfolio?

EEWG.L and BATG.L have a correlation of 0.61, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, EEWG.L or BATG.L?

On fees, EEWG.L is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, EEWG.L or BATG.L?

EEWG.L is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for BATG.L.

What is the main difference between EEWG.L and BATG.L?

EEWG.L is categorized as Global Equities, while BATG.L is Lithium & Battery Metals. EEWG.L tracks MSCI ACWI NR USD, while BATG.L tracks Solactive Battery Value-Chain Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Legal & General Investment Management. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for EEWG.L and 0.49% for BATG.L.