PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EES vs. NTSX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EES vs. NTSX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in WisdomTree U.S. SmallCap Fund (EES) and WisdomTree U.S. Efficient Core Fund (NTSX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EES achieves a 19.30% return, which is significantly higher than NTSX's 7.28% return.


EES

1D
-0.15%
1M
0.09%
6M
14.07%
YTD
19.30%
1Y
35.49%
3Y*
13.58%
5Y*
8.46%
10Y*
11.05%
ALL TIME*
8.88%

NTSX

1D
0.71%
1M
-0.51%
6M
6.45%
YTD
7.28%
1Y
17.51%
3Y*
16.97%
5Y*
8.15%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
12.63%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$647.35K$769.12K$909.42K
$1.95M$1.79M$2.60M

EES vs. NTSX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
EES
WisdomTree U.S. SmallCap Fund
19.30%6.99%9.86%18.53%-16.18%34.39%3.06%21.68%-17.98%
NTSX
WisdomTree U.S. Efficient Core Fund
7.28%18.82%20.20%22.70%-25.84%22.21%24.87%32.03%-7.87%

Correlation

The correlation between EES and NTSX is 0.67, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.67

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.64

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.69

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 2, 2018

0.67

The correlation between EES and NTSX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.64 to 0.69 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EES vs. NTSX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

EES
EES Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
EES Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EES Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
EES Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
EES Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
EES Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank

NTSX
NTSX Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
NTSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5151
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NTSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
NTSX Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
NTSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5050
Calmar Ratio Rank
NTSX Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

EES vs. NTSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree U.S. SmallCap Fund (EES) and WisdomTree U.S. Efficient Core Fund (NTSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


EESNTSXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.72

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.11

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

1.22

+0.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.12

1.79

+2.32

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.80

7.28

+5.52

EES vs. NTSX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EES Sharpe Ratio is 1.96, which is higher than the NTSX Sharpe Ratio of 1.24. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EES and NTSX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

EES vs. NTSX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EES drawdown since its inception was -63.66%, which is greater than NTSX's maximum drawdown of -31.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EES and NTSX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EESNTSXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-63.66%

-31.34%

-32.32%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.98%

-9.16%

+1.18%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.15%

-16.82%

-10.33%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.15%

-31.34%

+4.19%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-50.52%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.33%

-2.27%

+0.94%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.29%

-6.70%

-3.59%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.56%

2.26%

+0.30%

Volatility

EES vs. NTSX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for WisdomTree U.S. SmallCap Fund (EES) is 3.32%, while WisdomTree U.S. Efficient Core Fund (NTSX) has a volatility of 3.82%. This indicates that EES experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NTSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EESNTSXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.32%

3.82%

-0.50%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.83%

10.74%

+0.09%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.81%

13.29%

+3.52%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.33%

17.20%

+4.13%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.71%

18.22%

+5.49%

EES vs. NTSX - Expense Ratio Comparison

EES has a 0.38% expense ratio, which is higher than NTSX's 0.20% expense ratio.


Dividends

EES vs. NTSX - Dividend Comparison

EES's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.14%, more than NTSX's 1.10% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EES
WisdomTree U.S. SmallCap Fund
1.14%1.29%1.37%1.18%1.12%1.69%1.29%1.31%1.81%0.93%1.02%1.38%
NTSX
WisdomTree U.S. Efficient Core Fund
1.10%1.14%1.14%1.21%1.36%0.82%0.92%1.42%0.62%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


EES and NTSX have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NTSX has higher volatility (3.82%) compared to EES (3.32%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EES dropped -63.66% vs NTSX's -31.34%.

On 5-year performance, EES leads with 8.46% vs 8.15% for NTSX. On fees, NTSX is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, EES has been the lower-risk option at 3.32%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, EES has performed better with a 8.46% return vs 8.15%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

NTSX is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.38% for EES.

EES has the higher dividend yield at 1.14%, compared with 1.10% for NTSX.

EES is categorized as Small Cap Blend Equities, while NTSX is Diversified Portfolio. Their fees differ too: 0.38% for EES and 0.20% for NTSX.

EES currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.96 vs 1.24), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EES and NTSX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer