EEOFX vs. CHCLX
Compare and contrast key facts about Essex Environmental Opportunities Fund (EEOFX) and AB Discovery Growth Fund (CHCLX).
EEOFX is managed by Pear Tree Funds. It was launched on Sep 1, 2017. CHCLX is managed by AllianceBernstein. It was launched on Jul 7, 1938.
Performance
EEOFX vs. CHCLX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
EEOFX vs. CHCLX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EEOFX Essex Environmental Opportunities Fund | 0.37% | 23.55% | 1.32% | -1.53% | -27.88% | 10.83% | 62.80% | 25.43% | -15.79% | 3.20% |
CHCLX AB Discovery Growth Fund | -3.46% | 6.67% | 17.37% | 18.72% | -36.11% | 11.63% | 52.90% | 39.99% | -4.56% | 13.20% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EEOFX achieves a 0.37% return, which is significantly higher than CHCLX's -3.46% return.
EEOFX
- 1D
- 3.58%
- 1M
- -6.79%
- YTD
- 0.37%
- 6M
- -0.31%
- 1Y
- 33.61%
- 3Y*
- 5.36%
- 5Y*
- -1.61%
- 10Y*
- —
CHCLX
- 1D
- 5.43%
- 1M
- -6.62%
- YTD
- -3.46%
- 6M
- -0.09%
- 1Y
- 17.91%
- 3Y*
- 10.15%
- 5Y*
- -0.30%
- 10Y*
- 11.76%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
EEOFX vs. CHCLX - Expense Ratio Comparison
EEOFX has a 2.11% expense ratio, which is higher than CHCLX's 0.91% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
EEOFX vs. CHCLX — Risk / Return Rank
EEOFX
CHCLX
EEOFX vs. CHCLX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Essex Environmental Opportunities Fund (EEOFX) and AB Discovery Growth Fund (CHCLX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EEOFX | CHCLX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.52 | 0.67 | +0.85 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.12 | 1.11 | +1.02 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.27 | 1.15 | +0.12 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.09 | 1.07 | +1.02 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.79 | 3.71 | +3.08 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EEOFX | CHCLX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.52 | 0.67 | +0.85 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.07 | -0.01 | -0.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.47 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.28 | 0.37 | -0.09 |
Correlation
The correlation between EEOFX and CHCLX is 0.82, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
EEOFX vs. CHCLX - Dividend Comparison
EEOFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.06%, less than CHCLX's 12.02% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EEOFX Essex Environmental Opportunities Fund | 0.06% | 0.06% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.01% | 6.63% | 1.62% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
CHCLX AB Discovery Growth Fund | 12.02% | 11.60% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 17.54% | 15.15% | 13.36% | 20.33% | 6.74% | 0.00% | 6.08% |
Drawdowns
EEOFX vs. CHCLX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EEOFX drawdown since its inception was -50.17%, smaller than the maximum CHCLX drawdown of -63.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EEOFX and CHCLX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| EEOFX | CHCLX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -50.17% | -63.85% | +13.68% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.49% | -15.70% | +2.21% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -50.17% | -44.63% | -5.54% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -44.63% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -22.58% | -13.60% | -8.98% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -19.83% | -14.23% | -5.60% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.28% | 4.52% | -0.24% |
Volatility
EEOFX vs. CHCLX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Essex Environmental Opportunities Fund (EEOFX) is 7.95%, while AB Discovery Growth Fund (CHCLX) has a volatility of 11.03%. This indicates that EEOFX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CHCLX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| EEOFX | CHCLX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.95% | 11.03% | -3.08% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.62% | 18.53% | -1.91% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 23.25% | 27.32% | -4.07% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.89% | 25.69% | -0.80% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.72% | 24.85% | -0.13% |