PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EEMX vs. VEXC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EEMX vs. VEXC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR MSCI Emerging Markets Fossil Fuel Free ETF (EEMX) and Vanguard Emerging Markets Ex-China ETF (VEXC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EEMX achieves a 18.71% return, which is significantly higher than VEXC's 17.29% return.


EEMX

1D
0.69%
1M
-2.50%
6M
9.90%
YTD
18.71%
1Y
37.30%
3Y*
19.41%
5Y*
7.90%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
9.29%

VEXC

1D
1.25%
1M
-2.53%
6M
11.04%
YTD
17.29%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$114.77K$173.22K$297.15K
$2.10M$2.14M$2.87M

EEMX vs. VEXC - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between EEMX and VEXC is 0.91, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 2, 2025

0.91

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EEMX vs. VEXC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

EEMX
EEMX Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
EEMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EEMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
EEMX Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
EEMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
EEMX Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank

VEXC

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

EEMX vs. VEXC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR MSCI Emerging Markets Fossil Fuel Free ETF (EEMX) and Vanguard Emerging Markets Ex-China ETF (VEXC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


EEMXVEXCDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.51

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.80

EEMX vs. VEXC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

EEMX vs. VEXC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EEMX drawdown since its inception was -39.90%, which is greater than VEXC's maximum drawdown of -12.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EEMX and VEXC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EEMXVEXCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-39.90%

-12.42%

-27.48%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.47%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.64%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-34.31%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-10.21%

-6.04%

-4.17%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-14.60%

-2.61%

-11.99%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.65%

Volatility

EEMX vs. VEXC - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EEMXVEXCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.58%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

23.32%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

25.34%

20.44%

+4.90%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.14%

20.44%

-0.30%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.76%

20.44%

+0.32%

EEMX vs. VEXC - Expense Ratio Comparison

EEMX has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is higher than VEXC's 0.07% expense ratio.


Dividends

EEMX vs. VEXC - Dividend Comparison

EEMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.90%, more than VEXC's 1.47% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
EEMX
SPDR MSCI Emerging Markets Fossil Fuel Free ETF
1.90%2.28%2.26%2.20%2.38%1.72%1.42%2.57%2.41%2.45%0.15%
VEXC
Vanguard Emerging Markets Ex-China ETF
1.47%0.43%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.91, EEMX and VEXC move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, VEXC is cheaper at 0.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

VEXC is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for EEMX.

EEMX has the higher dividend yield at 1.90%, compared with 1.47% for VEXC.

EEMX tracks MSCI Emerging Markets ex Fossil Fuels Index, while VEXC tracks FTSE Emerging ex China Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for EEMX and 0.07% for VEXC.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EEMX and VEXC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer