PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EEMX vs. AVDV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EEMX vs. AVDV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR MSCI Emerging Markets Fossil Fuel Free ETF (EEMX) and Avantis International Small Cap Value ETF (AVDV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EEMX achieves a 27.49% return, which is significantly higher than AVDV's 16.64% return.


EEMX

1D
-1.13%
1M
6.59%
YTD
27.49%
6M
30.63%
1Y
54.54%
3Y*
24.62%
5Y*
7.82%
10Y*

AVDV

1D
0.52%
1M
3.19%
YTD
16.64%
6M
20.05%
1Y
44.34%
3Y*
28.61%
5Y*
13.84%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EEMX vs. AVDV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
EEMX
SPDR MSCI Emerging Markets Fossil Fuel Free ETF
27.49%35.23%7.22%9.80%-19.75%-3.57%19.55%11.02%
AVDV
Avantis International Small Cap Value ETF
16.64%49.37%8.67%16.85%-11.47%15.80%5.01%12.05%

Correlation

The correlation between EEMX and AVDV is 0.68, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.68

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.69

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.72

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 27, 2019

0.71

The correlation between EEMX and AVDV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.68 to 0.72 - a consistent structural relationship.

EEMX vs. AVDV - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
EEMX
AVDV

Technology

38.7%
6.4%

Financial Services

20.7%
13.7%

Consumer Cyclical

10.1%
14.4%

Industrials

7.6%
21.3%

Communication Services

7.3%
2.0%

Basic Materials

6.3%
22.5%

Consumer Defensive

3.2%
3.4%

Healthcare

3.0%
2.1%

Utilities

1.5%
1.7%

Real Estate

1.1%
1.1%

Energy

0.5%
10.8%

Technology

EEMX
38.7%
AVDV
6.4%

Financial Services

EEMX
20.7%
AVDV
13.7%

Consumer Cyclical

EEMX
10.1%
AVDV
14.4%

Industrials

EEMX
7.6%
AVDV
21.3%

Communication Services

EEMX
7.3%
AVDV
2.0%

Basic Materials

EEMX
6.3%
AVDV
22.5%

Consumer Defensive

EEMX
3.2%
AVDV
3.4%

Healthcare

EEMX
3.0%
AVDV
2.1%

Utilities

EEMX
1.5%
AVDV
1.7%

Real Estate

EEMX
1.1%
AVDV
1.1%

Energy

EEMX
0.5%
AVDV
10.8%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EEMX vs. AVDV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EEMX
EEMX Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
EEMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EEMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
EEMX Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
EEMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
EEMX Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank

AVDV
AVDV Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
AVDV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AVDV Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
AVDV Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
AVDV Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
AVDV Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EEMX vs. AVDV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR MSCI Emerging Markets Fossil Fuel Free ETF (EEMX) and Avantis International Small Cap Value ETF (AVDV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EEMXAVDVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.23

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.37

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.48

1.52

-0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.95

3.38

+0.57

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.59

13.70

+1.89

EEMX vs. AVDV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EEMX Sharpe Ratio is 2.64, which is comparable to the AVDV Sharpe Ratio of 2.87. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EEMX and AVDV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EEMXAVDVDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.64

2.87

-0.23

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.41

0.80

-0.39

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.47

0.80

-0.33

Drawdowns

EEMX vs. AVDV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EEMX drawdown since its inception was -39.90%, smaller than the maximum AVDV drawdown of -43.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EEMX and AVDV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EEMXAVDVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-39.90%

-43.01%

+3.11%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.89%

-13.19%

-0.70%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.64%

-14.17%

-3.47%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-37.08%

-28.08%

-9.00%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.43%

-0.83%

-1.60%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-14.73%

-6.77%

-7.96%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.51%

3.24%

+0.27%

Volatility

EEMX vs. AVDV - Volatility Comparison

SPDR MSCI Emerging Markets Fossil Fuel Free ETF (EEMX) has a higher volatility of 8.86% compared to Avantis International Small Cap Value ETF (AVDV) at 4.79%. This indicates that EEMX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AVDV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EEMXAVDVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.86%

4.79%

+4.07%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

18.24%

13.07%

+5.17%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.78%

15.54%

+5.24%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.15%

17.29%

+1.86%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.22%

19.72%

+0.50%

EEMX vs. AVDV - Expense Ratio Comparison

EEMX has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is lower than AVDV's 0.36% expense ratio.


Dividends

EEMX vs. AVDV - Dividend Comparison

EEMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.77%, less than AVDV's 2.73% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
AVDV
Avantis International Small Cap Value ETF
2.73%3.05%4.31%3.29%3.17%2.39%1.67%0.36%0.00%0.00%0.00%
EEMX
SPDR MSCI Emerging Markets Fossil Fuel Free ETF
1.77%2.28%2.26%2.20%2.38%1.72%1.42%2.57%2.41%2.45%0.15%

Frequently Asked Questions


EEMX and AVDV have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

EEMX has higher volatility (8.86%) compared to AVDV (4.79%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EEMX dropped -39.90% vs AVDV's -43.01%.

On 5-year performance, AVDV leads with 13.84% vs 7.82% for EEMX. On fees, EEMX is cheaper at 0.30% per year. On volatility, AVDV has been the lower-risk option at 4.79%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, AVDV has performed better with a 13.84% return vs 7.82%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

EEMX is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.36% for AVDV.

AVDV has the higher dividend yield at 2.73%, compared with 1.77% for EEMX.

EEMX is categorized as Asia Pacific Equities, while AVDV is Foreign Small & Mid Cap Equities. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Avantis. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for EEMX and 0.36% for AVDV.

AVDV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.87 vs 2.64), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EEMX and AVDV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer