EEMD vs. EMXC

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about AAM S&P Emerging Markets High Dividend Value ETF (EEMD) and iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China ETF (EMXC).

EEMD and EMXC are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. EEMD is a passively managed fund by Advisors Asset Management that tracks the performance of the S&P Emerging Markets Dividend and Free Cash Flow Yield. It was launched on Nov 28, 2017. EMXC is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the MSCI Emerging Markets ex China Index. It was launched on Jul 19, 2017. Both EEMD and EMXC are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.

Performance

EEMD vs. EMXC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AAM S&P Emerging Markets High Dividend Value ETF (EEMD) and iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China ETF (EMXC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

EEMD vs. EMXC - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
EEMD AAM S&P Emerging Markets High Dividend Value ETF	0.00%	0.00%	9.61%	17.60%	-11.21%	5.54%	-0.35%	12.55%	-14.57%	5.00%
EMXC iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China ETF	8.23%	35.14%	2.68%	18.96%	-19.56%	8.54%	12.76%	15.80%	-12.96%	2.90%

Returns By Period

EEMD

• 1D: —
• 1M: —
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

EMXC

• 1D: 4.13%
• 1M: -10.29%
• YTD: 8.23%
• 6M: 18.73%
• 1Y: 47.21%
• 3Y*: 19.79%
• 5Y*: 8.20%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EEMD vs. EMXC - Expense Ratio Comparison

EEMD has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than EMXC's 0.49% expense ratio.

EEMD

AAM S&P Emerging Markets High Dividend Value ETF

EMXC

iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China ETF

Return for Risk

EEMD vs. EMXC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EMXC

EMXC Risk / Return Rank: 94
EMXC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 95
EMXC Sortino Ratio Rank: 95
EMXC Omega Ratio Rank: 94
EMXC Calmar Ratio Rank: 92
EMXC Martin Ratio Rank: 94

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EEMD vs. EMXC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AAM S&P Emerging Markets High Dividend Value ETF (EEMD) and iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China ETF (EMXC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	EEMD	EMXC	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	2.31	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.49	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	—	0.39	—

Correlation

The correlation between EEMD and EMXC is 0.67, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

EEMD vs. EMXC - Dividend Comparison

EEMD has not paid dividends to shareholders, while EMXC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.60%.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
EEMD AAM S&P Emerging Markets High Dividend Value ETF	0.00%	0.00%	4.03%	8.41%	7.66%	6.34%	3.84%	5.35%	4.91%	0.42%
EMXC iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China ETF	2.60%	2.82%	2.69%	1.83%	2.85%	1.78%	1.45%	3.25%	2.63%	0.99%

Drawdowns

Drawdown Indicators

	EEMD	EMXC	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	—	-42.81%	—
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-14.41%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-28.91%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	—	-10.88%	—
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	—	-10.35%	—
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	3.40%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	EEMD	EMXC	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	11.89%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	16.14%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	20.58%	—
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	—	16.70%	—
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	—	19.51%	—