PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EEJG.L vs. VJPU.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EEJG.L vs. VJPU.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in iShares MSCI Japan ESG Enhanced UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (EEJG.L) and Vanguard FTSE Japan UCITS ETF USD Hedged Acc (VJPU.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

EEJG.L is traded in GBP, while VJPU.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the VJPU.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EEJG.L achieves a 15.84% return, which is significantly lower than VJPU.L's 20.12% return.


EEJG.L

1D
-0.30%
1M
2.97%
YTD
15.84%
6M
15.78%
1Y
35.48%
3Y*
14.25%
5Y*
9.31%
10Y*

VJPU.L

1D
-0.28%
1M
7.88%
YTD
20.12%
6M
21.04%
1Y
54.82%
3Y*
26.16%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EEJG.L vs. VJPU.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
EEJG.L
iShares MSCI Japan ESG Enhanced UCITS ETF USD (Dist)
15.84%17.60%6.43%13.48%3.06%
VJPU.L
Vanguard FTSE Japan UCITS ETF USD Hedged Acc
20.09%22.15%25.96%28.86%-0.05%

Correlation

The correlation between EEJG.L and VJPU.L is 0.80, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.80

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.78

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 14, 2022

0.72

The correlation between EEJG.L and VJPU.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.72 to 0.80 - a consistent structural relationship.

EEJG.L vs. VJPU.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
EEJG.L
VJPU.L

Industrials

22.9%
26.6%

Technology

22.2%
17.4%

Financial Services

21.1%
15.9%

Consumer Cyclical

10.4%
12.8%

Healthcare

8.5%
5.9%

Communication Services

8.4%
7.1%

Real Estate

4.0%
3.4%

Basic Materials

1.4%
4.3%

Consumer Defensive

0.8%
4.2%

Energy

0.1%
1.0%

Utilities

0.1%
1.3%

Industrials

EEJG.L
22.9%
VJPU.L
26.6%

Technology

EEJG.L
22.2%
VJPU.L
17.4%

Financial Services

EEJG.L
21.1%
VJPU.L
15.9%

Consumer Cyclical

EEJG.L
10.4%
VJPU.L
12.8%

Healthcare

EEJG.L
8.5%
VJPU.L
5.9%

Communication Services

EEJG.L
8.4%
VJPU.L
7.1%

Real Estate

EEJG.L
4.0%
VJPU.L
3.4%

Basic Materials

EEJG.L
1.4%
VJPU.L
4.3%

Consumer Defensive

EEJG.L
0.8%
VJPU.L
4.2%

Energy

EEJG.L
0.1%
VJPU.L
1.0%

Utilities

EEJG.L
0.1%
VJPU.L
1.3%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EEJG.L vs. VJPU.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EEJG.L
EEJG.L Risk / Return Rank: 5757
Overall Rank
EEJG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EEJG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
EEJG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
EEJG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
EEJG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank

VJPU.L
VJPU.L Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
VJPU.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VJPU.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
VJPU.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
VJPU.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
VJPU.L Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EEJG.L vs. VJPU.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Japan ESG Enhanced UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (EEJG.L) and Vanguard FTSE Japan UCITS ETF USD Hedged Acc (VJPU.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EEJG.LVJPU.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.06

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.18

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

1.52

-0.17

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.01

6.27

-3.27

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.84

21.16

-11.32

EEJG.L vs. VJPU.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EEJG.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.82, which is lower than the VJPU.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.88. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EEJG.L and VJPU.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EEJG.LVJPU.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.82

2.88

-1.06

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.58

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.66

1.23

-0.57

Drawdowns

EEJG.L vs. VJPU.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EEJG.L drawdown since its inception was -19.37%, smaller than the maximum VJPU.L drawdown of -24.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EEJG.L and VJPU.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EEJG.LVJPU.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-19.37%

-24.99%

+5.62%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.39%

-8.70%

-2.69%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.99%

-24.99%

+11.00%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.37%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.30%

-0.28%

-0.02%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.78%

-3.58%

-2.20%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.48%

2.58%

+0.90%

Volatility

EEJG.L vs. VJPU.L - Volatility Comparison

iShares MSCI Japan ESG Enhanced UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (EEJG.L) has a higher volatility of 4.29% compared to Vanguard FTSE Japan UCITS ETF USD Hedged Acc (VJPU.L) at 3.69%. This indicates that EEJG.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VJPU.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EEJG.LVJPU.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.29%

3.69%

+0.60%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.23%

14.76%

+0.47%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.80%

18.99%

-0.19%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.92%

20.28%

-4.36%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.99%

20.28%

-4.29%

EEJG.L vs. VJPU.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

EEJG.L has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than VJPU.L's 0.20% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

EEJG.L vs. VJPU.L - Dividend Comparison

EEJG.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.36%, while VJPU.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020
EEJG.L
iShares MSCI Japan ESG Enhanced UCITS ETF USD (Dist)
1.36%1.57%1.81%1.74%2.10%1.69%1.64%
VJPU.L
Vanguard FTSE Japan UCITS ETF USD Hedged Acc
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


EEJG.L and VJPU.L have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, EEJG.L is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

EEJG.L is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for VJPU.L.

EEJG.L tracks TOPIX TR JPY, while VJPU.L tracks FTSE Japan (USD Hedged). They also come from different issuers: iShares and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for EEJG.L and 0.20% for VJPU.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EEJG.L and VJPU.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer