EEJG.L vs. VJPU.L
EEJG.L (iShares MSCI Japan ESG Enhanced UCITS ETF USD (Dist)) and VJPU.L (Vanguard FTSE Japan UCITS ETF USD Hedged Acc) are both Japan Equities funds - EEJG.L tracks the TOPIX TR JPY while VJPU.L tracks the FTSE Japan (USD Hedged). Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, EEJG.L returned 14.25%/yr vs 26.16%/yr for VJPU.L. A 0.72 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. EEJG.L charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for VJPU.L.
Performance
EEJG.L vs. VJPU.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
EEJG.L is traded in GBP, while VJPU.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the VJPU.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EEJG.L achieves a 15.84% return, which is significantly lower than VJPU.L's 20.12% return.
EEJG.L
- 1D
- -0.30%
- 1M
- 2.97%
- YTD
- 15.84%
- 6M
- 15.78%
- 1Y
- 35.48%
- 3Y*
- 14.25%
- 5Y*
- 9.31%
- 10Y*
- —
VJPU.L
- 1D
- -0.28%
- 1M
- 7.88%
- YTD
- 20.12%
- 6M
- 21.04%
- 1Y
- 54.82%
- 3Y*
- 26.16%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
EEJG.L vs. VJPU.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EEJG.L iShares MSCI Japan ESG Enhanced UCITS ETF USD (Dist) | 15.84% | 17.60% | 6.43% | 13.48% | 3.06% |
VJPU.L Vanguard FTSE Japan UCITS ETF USD Hedged Acc | 20.09% | 22.15% | 25.96% | 28.86% | -0.05% |
Correlation
The correlation between EEJG.L and VJPU.L is 0.80, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.80 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.78 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 14, 2022 | 0.72 |
The correlation between EEJG.L and VJPU.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.72 to 0.80 - a consistent structural relationship.
EEJG.L vs. VJPU.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
EEJG.L
VJPU.L
Industrials
Technology
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Communication Services
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Utilities
Industrials
EEJG.L
VJPU.L
Technology
EEJG.L
VJPU.L
Financial Services
EEJG.L
VJPU.L
Consumer Cyclical
EEJG.L
VJPU.L
Healthcare
EEJG.L
VJPU.L
Communication Services
EEJG.L
VJPU.L
Real Estate
EEJG.L
VJPU.L
Basic Materials
EEJG.L
VJPU.L
Consumer Defensive
EEJG.L
VJPU.L
Energy
EEJG.L
VJPU.L
Utilities
EEJG.L
VJPU.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EEJG.L vs. VJPU.L — Risk / Return Rank
EEJG.L
VJPU.L
EEJG.L vs. VJPU.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Japan ESG Enhanced UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (EEJG.L) and Vanguard FTSE Japan UCITS ETF USD Hedged Acc (VJPU.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EEJG.L | VJPU.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.06 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.18 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | 1.52 | -0.17 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.01 | 6.27 | -3.27 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.84 | 21.16 | -11.32 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EEJG.L | VJPU.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.82 | 2.88 | -1.06 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.58 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.66 | 1.23 | -0.57 |
Drawdowns
EEJG.L vs. VJPU.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EEJG.L drawdown since its inception was -19.37%, smaller than the maximum VJPU.L drawdown of -24.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EEJG.L and VJPU.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EEJG.L | VJPU.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -19.37% | -24.99% | +5.62% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.39% | -8.70% | -2.69% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.99% | -24.99% | +11.00% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -19.37% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.30% | -0.28% | -0.02% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.78% | -3.58% | -2.20% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.48% | 2.58% | +0.90% |
Volatility
EEJG.L vs. VJPU.L - Volatility Comparison
iShares MSCI Japan ESG Enhanced UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (EEJG.L) has a higher volatility of 4.29% compared to Vanguard FTSE Japan UCITS ETF USD Hedged Acc (VJPU.L) at 3.69%. This indicates that EEJG.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VJPU.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EEJG.L | VJPU.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.29% | 3.69% | +0.60% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.23% | 14.76% | +0.47% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.80% | 18.99% | -0.19% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.92% | 20.28% | -4.36% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.99% | 20.28% | -4.29% |
EEJG.L vs. VJPU.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
EEJG.L has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than VJPU.L's 0.20% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
EEJG.L vs. VJPU.L - Dividend Comparison
EEJG.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.36%, while VJPU.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EEJG.L iShares MSCI Japan ESG Enhanced UCITS ETF USD (Dist) | 1.36% | 1.57% | 1.81% | 1.74% | 2.10% | 1.69% | 1.64% |
VJPU.L Vanguard FTSE Japan UCITS ETF USD Hedged Acc | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EEJG.L and VJPU.L have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, EEJG.L is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
EEJG.L is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for VJPU.L.
EEJG.L tracks TOPIX TR JPY, while VJPU.L tracks FTSE Japan (USD Hedged). They also come from different issuers: iShares and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for EEJG.L and 0.20% for VJPU.L.
Find the right allocation for EEJG.L and VJPU.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer