PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
EEJG.L vs. CSP1.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

EEJG.L vs. CSP1.L

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

EEJG.L (iShares MSCI Japan ESG Enhanced UCITS ETF USD (Dist)) and CSP1.L (iShares Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - EEJG.L is a Japan Equities fund tracking the TOPIX TR JPY, while CSP1.L is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, EEJG.L returned 9.31%/yr vs 14.94%/yr for CSP1.L. A 0.54 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. EEJG.L charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.07%/yr for CSP1.L.

Performance

EEJG.L vs. CSP1.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in iShares MSCI Japan ESG Enhanced UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (EEJG.L) and iShares Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF (CSP1.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

EEJG.L is traded in GBP, while CSP1.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the CSP1.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EEJG.L achieves a 15.84% return, which is significantly higher than CSP1.L's 10.55% return.

EEJG.L

1D
-0.30%
1M
5.45%
YTD
15.84%
6M
15.60%
1Y
34.38%
3Y*
14.25%
5Y*
9.31%
10Y*
—

CSP1.L

1D
0.05%
1M
4.54%
YTD
10.55%
6M
9.89%
1Y
28.98%
3Y*
19.02%
5Y*
14.94%
10Y*
16.07%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EEJG.L vs. CSP1.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
EEJG.L
iShares MSCI Japan ESG Enhanced UCITS ETF USD (Dist)		15.84%17.60%6.43%13.48%-8.04%1.83%19.79%
CSP1.L
iShares Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF		10.55%9.37%27.35%19.79%-9.05%31.07%19.34%

Correlation

The correlation between EEJG.L and CSP1.L is 0.48, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.48

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.47

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.52

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 29, 2020

0.54

The correlation between EEJG.L and CSP1.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.47 to 0.54 - a consistent structural relationship.

EEJG.L vs. CSP1.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors
EEJG.L
CSP1.L

Industrials

22.9%
7.9%

Technology

22.2%
38.0%

Financial Services

21.1%
11.3%

Consumer Cyclical

10.4%
9.9%

Healthcare

8.5%
8.4%

Communication Services

8.4%
10.7%

Real Estate

4.0%
1.9%

Basic Materials

1.4%
1.7%

Consumer Defensive

0.8%
4.7%

Energy

0.1%
3.4%

Utilities

0.1%
2.2%

Industrials

EEJG.L
22.9%
CSP1.L
7.9%

Technology

EEJG.L
22.2%
CSP1.L
38.0%

Financial Services

EEJG.L
21.1%
CSP1.L
11.3%

Consumer Cyclical

EEJG.L
10.4%
CSP1.L
9.9%

Healthcare

EEJG.L
8.5%
CSP1.L
8.4%

Communication Services

EEJG.L
8.4%
CSP1.L
10.7%

Real Estate

EEJG.L
4.0%
CSP1.L
1.9%

Basic Materials

EEJG.L
1.4%
CSP1.L
1.7%

Consumer Defensive

EEJG.L
0.8%
CSP1.L
4.7%

Energy

EEJG.L
0.1%
CSP1.L
3.4%

Utilities

EEJG.L
0.1%
CSP1.L
2.2%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

iShares MSCI Japan ESG Enhanced UCITS ETF USD (Dist)

iShares Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF

Often compared with EEJG.L:
EEJG.L vs. VJPN.LEEJG.L vs. PRIJ.LEEJG.L vs. VUAG.LEEJG.L vs. VUAA.LEEJG.L vs. VJPB.LEEJG.L vs. PAJS.LEEJG.L vs. DXJP.L
Often compared with CSP1.L:
CSP1.L vs. CSPX.LCSP1.L vs. VUAG.LCSP1.L vs. SPYCSP1.L vs. IUSA.LCSP1.L vs. VUAA.LCSP1.L vs. SPY5.LCSP1.L vs. VOO

Return for Risk

EEJG.L vs. CSP1.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
EEJG.L
EEJG.L Risk / Return Rank: 5757
Overall Rank
EEJG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EEJG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
EEJG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
EEJG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
EEJG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank
CSP1.L
CSP1.L Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
CSP1.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CSP1.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
CSP1.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
CSP1.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
CSP1.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EEJG.L vs. CSP1.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Japan ESG Enhanced UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (EEJG.L) and iShares Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF (CSP1.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

EEJG.LCSP1.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
1.82
2.73

-0.91

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
2.62
3.66

-1.04

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

1.51

-0.16

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.01

4.07

-1.07

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.84

14.99

-5.15

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

EEJG.L vs. CSP1.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EEJG.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.82, which is lower than the CSP1.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.73. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EEJG.L and CSP1.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

EEJG.LCSP1.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.82

2.73

-0.91

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.58

1.04

-0.46

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

—

1.03

—

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.66

1.09

-0.43

Drawdowns

EEJG.L vs. CSP1.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EEJG.L drawdown since its inception was -19.37%, smaller than the maximum CSP1.L drawdown of -25.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EEJG.L and CSP1.L.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

EEJG.LCSP1.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-19.37%

-25.48%

+6.11%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.39%

-7.12%

-4.27%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.99%

-20.77%

+6.78%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.37%

-20.77%

+1.40%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

—

-25.48%

—

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.30%

-0.24%

-0.06%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.78%

-3.32%

-2.46%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.48%

1.94%

+1.54%

Volatility

EEJG.L vs. CSP1.L - Volatility Comparison

iShares MSCI Japan ESG Enhanced UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (EEJG.L) has a higher volatility of 4.29% compared to iShares Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF (CSP1.L) at 2.62%. This indicates that EEJG.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CSP1.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

EEJG.LCSP1.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.29%

2.62%

+1.67%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.23%

7.16%

+8.07%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.80%

10.62%

+8.18%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.92%

14.31%

+1.61%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.99%

15.57%

+0.42%

EEJG.L vs. CSP1.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

EEJG.L has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is higher than CSP1.L's 0.07% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

EEJG.L vs. CSP1.L - Dividend Comparison

EEJG.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.36%, while CSP1.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.

PositionTTM202520242023202220212020
CSP1.L
iShares Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF		0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
EEJG.L
iShares MSCI Japan ESG Enhanced UCITS ETF USD (Dist)		1.36%1.57%1.81%1.74%2.10%1.69%1.64%

Frequently Asked Questions

EEJG.L and CSP1.L have a correlation of 0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, CSP1.L is cheaper at 0.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

CSP1.L is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for EEJG.L.

EEJG.L is categorized as Japan Equities, while CSP1.L is S&P 500. EEJG.L tracks TOPIX TR JPY, while CSP1.L tracks S&P 500 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for EEJG.L and 0.07% for CSP1.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EEJG.L and CSP1.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer