EEJD.L vs. LGJG.L
EEJD.L (iShares MSCI Japan CTB Enhanced ESG UCITS ETF USD (Dist)) and LGJG.L (L&G Japan Equity UCITS ETF) are both Japan Equities funds - EEJD.L tracks the MSCI Japan ESG Enhanced CTB Index while LGJG.L tracks the TOPIX TR JPY. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, EEJD.L returned 8.78%/yr vs 9.78%/yr for LGJG.L. Their correlation of 0.92 suggests significant overlap in exposure. EEJD.L charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.10%/yr for LGJG.L.
Performance
EEJD.L vs. LGJG.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
EEJD.L is traded in USD, while LGJG.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the LGJG.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with EEJD.L having a 16.29% return and LGJG.L slightly lower at 16.04%.
EEJD.L
- 1D
- -1.02%
- 1M
- -0.60%
- 6M
- 9.97%
- YTD
- 16.29%
- 1Y
- 36.05%
- 3Y*
- 17.05%
- 5Y*
- 8.78%
- 10Y*
- —
LGJG.L
- 1D
- -0.65%
- 1M
- 0.84%
- 6M
- 10.49%
- YTD
- 16.04%
- 1Y
- 35.34%
- 3Y*
- 18.24%
- 5Y*
- 9.78%
- 10Y*
- —
EEJD.L vs. LGJG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EEJD.L iShares MSCI Japan CTB Enhanced ESG UCITS ETF USD (Dist) | 16.29% | 26.10% | 4.67% | 19.98% | -17.73% | 0.41% | 17.33% | 15.33% |
LGJG.L L&G Japan Equity UCITS ETF | 16.04% | 26.32% | 8.18% | 19.64% | -16.80% | 1.36% | 16.14% | 13.58% |
Correlation
The correlation between EEJD.L and LGJG.L is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.94 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.93 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.93 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 8, 2019 | 0.92 |
The correlation between EEJD.L and LGJG.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EEJD.L vs. LGJG.L — Risk / Return Rank
EEJD.L
LGJG.L
EEJD.L vs. LGJG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Japan CTB Enhanced ESG UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (EEJD.L) and L&G Japan Equity UCITS ETF (LGJG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| EEJD.L | LGJG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.11 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.03 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.30 | 1.32 | -0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.78 | 2.66 | +0.12 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.14 | 8.86 | +0.29 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
EEJD.L vs. LGJG.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EEJD.L drawdown since its inception was -32.93%, smaller than the maximum LGJG.L drawdown of -36.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EEJD.L and LGJG.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EEJD.L | LGJG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -32.93% | -36.86% | +3.93% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.98% | -13.22% | +0.24% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.11% | -18.70% | +4.59% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -32.93% | -32.41% | -0.52% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.82% | -2.26% | -1.56% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.12% | -12.63% | +4.51% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.95% | 3.98% | -0.03% |
Volatility
EEJD.L vs. LGJG.L - Volatility Comparison
iShares MSCI Japan CTB Enhanced ESG UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (EEJD.L) has a higher volatility of 6.68% compared to L&G Japan Equity UCITS ETF (LGJG.L) at 6.30%. This indicates that EEJD.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LGJG.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EEJD.L | LGJG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.68% | 6.30% | +0.38% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 18.40% | 16.59% | +1.81% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.17% | 20.31% | +1.86% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.48% | 22.57% | -4.09% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.79% | 22.81% | -4.02% |
EEJD.L vs. LGJG.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
EEJD.L has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is higher than LGJG.L's 0.10% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
EEJD.L vs. LGJG.L - Dividend Comparison
EEJD.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.45%, while LGJG.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EEJD.L iShares MSCI Japan CTB Enhanced ESG UCITS ETF USD (Dist) | 1.45% | 1.58% | 1.83% | 1.74% | 2.13% | 1.71% | 1.55% | 1.73% |
LGJG.L L&G Japan Equity UCITS ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.94, EEJD.L and LGJG.L move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, LGJG.L is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
LGJG.L is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for EEJD.L.
EEJD.L tracks MSCI Japan ESG Enhanced CTB Index, while LGJG.L tracks TOPIX TR JPY. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Legal & General. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for EEJD.L and 0.10% for LGJG.L.
Find the right allocation for EEJD.L and LGJG.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer