PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EEI.L vs. LCPE.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EEI.L vs. LCPE.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in WisdomTree Europe Equity Income UCITS ETF (EEI.L) and Ossiam Shiller Barclays Cape Europe Sector Value TR UCITS (LCPE.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EEI.L achieves a 10.61% return, which is significantly lower than LCPE.L's 14.20% return. Over the past 10 years, EEI.L has underperformed LCPE.L with an annualized return of 4.18%, while LCPE.L has yielded a comparatively higher 10.16% annualized return.


EEI.L

1D
-0.21%
1M
1.61%
YTD
10.61%
6M
13.56%
1Y
22.61%
3Y*
10.39%
5Y*
6.38%
10Y*
4.18%

LCPE.L

1D
0.39%
1M
3.01%
YTD
14.20%
6M
14.45%
1Y
27.63%
3Y*
11.83%
5Y*
9.64%
10Y*
10.16%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EEI.L vs. LCPE.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
EEI.L
WisdomTree Europe Equity Income UCITS ETF
10.61%26.84%-7.65%5.93%0.84%5.79%-16.98%9.05%-10.50%9.28%
LCPE.L
Ossiam Shiller Barclays Cape Europe Sector Value TR UCITS
14.20%18.88%-2.83%10.70%0.29%16.28%8.38%12.94%-2.26%9.54%

Correlation

The correlation between EEI.L and LCPE.L is 0.66, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.66

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.52

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.42

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.35

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 17, 2015

0.39

Over the past year, EEI.L and LCPE.L have become more correlated (0.66) than their long-term average of 0.39, meaning their price movements have been converging.

EEI.L vs. LCPE.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
EEI.L
LCPE.L

Financial Services

24.7%

-

Utilities

16.7%

-

Industrials

15.3%
0.2%

Energy

11.6%
0.0%

Communication Services

8.6%
0.0%

Basic Materials

8.3%
32.3%

Real Estate

4.8%
0.0%

Consumer Cyclical

3.3%
1.9%

Healthcare

2.8%
32.6%

Consumer Defensive

2.3%
32.8%

Technology

1.5%
0.2%

Financial Services

EEI.L
24.7%
LCPE.L

-

Utilities

EEI.L
16.7%
LCPE.L

-

Industrials

EEI.L
15.3%
LCPE.L
0.2%

Energy

EEI.L
11.6%
LCPE.L
0.0%

Communication Services

EEI.L
8.6%
LCPE.L
0.0%

Basic Materials

EEI.L
8.3%
LCPE.L
32.3%

Real Estate

EEI.L
4.8%
LCPE.L
0.0%

Consumer Cyclical

EEI.L
3.3%
LCPE.L
1.9%

Healthcare

EEI.L
2.8%
LCPE.L
32.6%

Consumer Defensive

EEI.L
2.3%
LCPE.L
32.8%

Technology

EEI.L
1.5%
LCPE.L
0.2%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EEI.L vs. LCPE.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EEI.L
EEI.L Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
EEI.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EEI.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
EEI.L Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
EEI.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
EEI.L Martin Ratio Rank: 6060
Martin Ratio Rank

LCPE.L
LCPE.L Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
LCPE.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LCPE.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
LCPE.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
LCPE.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
LCPE.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EEI.L vs. LCPE.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree Europe Equity Income UCITS ETF (EEI.L) and Ossiam Shiller Barclays Cape Europe Sector Value TR UCITS (LCPE.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EEI.LLCPE.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.38

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.77

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.38

1.43

-0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.71

4.13

-1.42

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.53

13.66

-3.13

EEI.L vs. LCPE.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EEI.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.07, which is comparable to the LCPE.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.44. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EEI.L and LCPE.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EEI.LLCPE.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.07

2.44

-0.38

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.46

1.04

-0.57

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.27

1.20

-0.93

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.21

0.98

-0.77

Drawdowns

EEI.L vs. LCPE.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EEI.L drawdown since its inception was -37.68%, which is greater than LCPE.L's maximum drawdown of -27.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EEI.L and LCPE.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EEI.LLCPE.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-37.68%

-27.05%

-10.63%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.29%

-6.66%

-1.63%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.75%

-12.39%

-2.36%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.71%

-12.39%

-5.32%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-37.68%

-27.05%

-10.63%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.98%

-2.71%

+1.73%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.38%

-3.52%

-7.86%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.14%

2.02%

+0.12%

Volatility

EEI.L vs. LCPE.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for WisdomTree Europe Equity Income UCITS ETF (EEI.L) is 3.45%, while Ossiam Shiller Barclays Cape Europe Sector Value TR UCITS (LCPE.L) has a volatility of 3.81%. This indicates that EEI.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LCPE.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EEI.LLCPE.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.45%

3.81%

-0.36%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.55%

8.48%

+0.07%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.89%

11.29%

-0.40%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.75%

17.74%

-3.99%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.52%

20.60%

-5.08%

EEI.L vs. LCPE.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

EEI.L has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is lower than LCPE.L's 0.65% expense ratio.


Dividends

EEI.L vs. LCPE.L - Dividend Comparison

EEI.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.05%, while LCPE.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EEI.L
WisdomTree Europe Equity Income UCITS ETF
0.05%0.05%0.07%0.06%0.05%0.05%0.06%0.06%0.05%0.04%0.03%0.04%
LCPE.L
Ossiam Shiller Barclays Cape Europe Sector Value TR UCITS
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


EEI.L and LCPE.L have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, EEI.L is cheaper at 0.29% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

EEI.L is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for LCPE.L.

EEI.L tracks MSCI Europe High Div Yld NR EUR, while LCPE.L tracks MSCI Europe NR EUR. They also come from different issuers: WisdomTree and Natixis. Their fees differ too: 0.29% for EEI.L and 0.65% for LCPE.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EEI.L and LCPE.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer