EEDS.L vs. FLXK.L
EEDS.L (iShares MSCI USA CTB Enhanced ESG UCITS ETF USD (Dist)) and FLXK.L (Franklin FTSE Korea UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) are both exchange-traded funds - EEDS.L is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the MSCI USA ESG Enhanced CTB Index, while FLXK.L is a South Korea Equities fund tracking the FTSE Korea 30/18 Capped Index (Net Return). Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, EEDS.L returned 10.81%/yr vs 15.20%/yr for FLXK.L. A 0.59 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. EEDS.L charges 0.07%/yr vs 0.09%/yr for FLXK.L.
Performance
EEDS.L vs. FLXK.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EEDS.L achieves a 8.07% return, which is significantly lower than FLXK.L's 71.91% return.
EEDS.L
- 1D
- -1.30%
- 1M
- -0.41%
- 6M
- 7.35%
- YTD
- 8.07%
- 1Y
- 18.22%
- 3Y*
- 17.80%
- 5Y*
- 10.81%
- 10Y*
- —
FLXK.L
- 1D
- -2.04%
- 1M
- -22.39%
- 6M
- 50.11%
- YTD
- 71.91%
- 1Y
- 137.12%
- 3Y*
- 38.47%
- 5Y*
- 15.20%
- 10Y*
- —
EEDS.L vs. FLXK.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EEDS.L iShares MSCI USA CTB Enhanced ESG UCITS ETF USD (Dist) | 8.07% | 14.97% | 24.21% | 26.17% | -21.67% | 27.87% | 22.28% | 18.43% |
FLXK.L Franklin FTSE Korea UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 71.91% | 94.79% | -21.63% | 20.77% | -28.01% | -6.85% | 47.31% | 13.27% |
Correlation
The correlation between EEDS.L and FLXK.L is 0.55, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.55 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.57 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.59 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 4, 2019 | 0.59 |
The correlation between EEDS.L and FLXK.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.55 to 0.59 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EEDS.L vs. FLXK.L — Risk / Return Rank
EEDS.L
FLXK.L
EEDS.L vs. FLXK.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI USA CTB Enhanced ESG UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (EEDS.L) and Franklin FTSE Korea UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (FLXK.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| EEDS.L | FLXK.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.56 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.00 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.27 | 1.45 | -0.19 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.99 | 5.32 | -3.32 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.04 | 17.39 | -9.35 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
EEDS.L vs. FLXK.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EEDS.L drawdown since its inception was -33.60%, smaller than the maximum FLXK.L drawdown of -49.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EEDS.L and FLXK.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EEDS.L | FLXK.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.60% | -49.43% | +15.83% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.10% | -25.64% | +16.54% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.59% | -28.54% | +8.95% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -27.26% | -47.00% | +19.74% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.70% | -25.64% | +23.94% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.80% | -20.23% | +14.43% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.26% | 7.86% | -5.60% |
Volatility
EEDS.L vs. FLXK.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares MSCI USA CTB Enhanced ESG UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (EEDS.L) is 3.14%, while Franklin FTSE Korea UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (FLXK.L) has a volatility of 18.88%. This indicates that EEDS.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FLXK.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EEDS.L | FLXK.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.14% | 18.88% | -15.74% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.57% | 41.57% | -32.00% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.49% | 45.12% | -32.63% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.53% | 29.63% | -13.10% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.82% | 29.60% | -11.78% |
EEDS.L vs. FLXK.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
EEDS.L has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is lower than FLXK.L's 0.09% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
EEDS.L vs. FLXK.L - Dividend Comparison
EEDS.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.84%, while FLXK.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EEDS.L iShares MSCI USA CTB Enhanced ESG UCITS ETF USD (Dist) | 0.84% | 0.89% | 1.00% | 1.15% | 1.42% | 1.01% | 1.24% | 1.07% |
FLXK.L Franklin FTSE Korea UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EEDS.L and FLXK.L have a correlation of 0.55, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, EEDS.L is cheaper at 0.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
EEDS.L is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.09% for FLXK.L.
EEDS.L is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while FLXK.L is South Korea Equities. EEDS.L tracks MSCI USA ESG Enhanced CTB Index, while FLXK.L tracks FTSE Korea 30/18 Capped Index (Net Return). They also come from different issuers: iShares and Franklin. Their fees differ too: 0.07% for EEDS.L and 0.09% for FLXK.L.
Find the right allocation for EEDS.L and FLXK.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer