PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EEDM.L vs. USDV.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EEDM.L vs. USDV.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI EM CTB Enhanced ESG UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (EEDM.L) and SPDR S&P US Dividend Aristocrats UCITS ETF Dis (USDV.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

EEDM.L is traded in USD, while USDV.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the USDV.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EEDM.L achieves a 15.41% return, which is significantly higher than USDV.L's 12.35% return.


EEDM.L

1D
-1.89%
1M
-9.56%
6M
10.23%
YTD
15.41%
1Y
29.68%
3Y*
18.64%
5Y*
5.67%
10Y*

USDV.L

1D
0.38%
1M
3.62%
6M
7.72%
YTD
12.35%
1Y
15.15%
3Y*
10.21%
5Y*
7.27%
10Y*
8.90%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EEDM.L vs. USDV.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
EEDM.L
iShares MSCI EM CTB Enhanced ESG UCITS ETF USD (Dist)
15.41%35.48%6.70%8.18%-21.69%-2.85%19.76%7.14%
USDV.L
SPDR S&P US Dividend Aristocrats UCITS ETF Dis
12.35%8.78%7.52%1.58%-0.37%25.59%0.26%3.97%

Correlation

The correlation between EEDM.L and USDV.L is 0.11, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.11

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.25

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.34

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 24, 2019

0.37

Over the past year, the correlation between EEDM.L and USDV.L has dropped to 0.11 - well below their long-term average of 0.37, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EEDM.L vs. USDV.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EEDM.L
EEDM.L Risk / Return Rank: 5353
Overall Rank
EEDM.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5151
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EEDM.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
EEDM.L Omega Ratio Rank: 5353
Omega Ratio Rank
EEDM.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
EEDM.L Martin Ratio Rank: 5454
Martin Ratio Rank

USDV.L
USDV.L Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
USDV.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
USDV.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
USDV.L Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
USDV.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
USDV.L Martin Ratio Rank: 4444
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EEDM.L vs. USDV.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI EM CTB Enhanced ESG UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (EEDM.L) and SPDR S&P US Dividend Aristocrats UCITS ETF Dis (USDV.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


EEDM.LUSDV.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.28

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.49

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.27

-0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.20

2.17

+0.04

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.95

5.35

+1.60

EEDM.L vs. USDV.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EEDM.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.35, which is comparable to the USDV.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.63. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EEDM.L and USDV.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

EEDM.L vs. USDV.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EEDM.L drawdown since its inception was -40.90%, which is greater than USDV.L's maximum drawdown of -38.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EEDM.L and USDV.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EEDM.LUSDV.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-40.90%

-38.11%

-2.79%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.41%

-6.96%

-6.45%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.97%

-15.12%

-1.85%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-36.39%

-15.12%

-21.27%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.73%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-11.26%

-0.04%

-11.22%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-16.32%

-6.59%

-9.73%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.26%

2.83%

+1.43%

Volatility

EEDM.L vs. USDV.L - Volatility Comparison

iShares MSCI EM CTB Enhanced ESG UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (EEDM.L) has a higher volatility of 9.16% compared to SPDR S&P US Dividend Aristocrats UCITS ETF Dis (USDV.L) at 2.46%. This indicates that EEDM.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than USDV.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EEDM.LUSDV.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.16%

2.46%

+6.70%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

20.04%

6.81%

+13.23%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.98%

9.38%

+12.60%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.47%

13.80%

+5.67%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.80%

15.71%

+5.09%

EEDM.L vs. USDV.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

EEDM.L has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is lower than USDV.L's 0.35% expense ratio.


Dividends

EEDM.L vs. USDV.L - Dividend Comparison

EEDM.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.69%, less than USDV.L's 2.01% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EEDM.L
iShares MSCI EM CTB Enhanced ESG UCITS ETF USD (Dist)
1.69%1.89%2.37%2.37%2.59%1.97%1.54%0.05%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
USDV.L
SPDR S&P US Dividend Aristocrats UCITS ETF Dis
2.01%2.20%1.99%2.28%2.11%2.13%2.57%2.07%2.19%1.85%1.65%2.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


EEDM.L and USDV.L have a correlation of 0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, EEDM.L is cheaper at 0.18% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

EEDM.L is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for USDV.L.

EEDM.L is categorized as Emerging Markets Equities, while USDV.L is Large Cap Blend Equities. EEDM.L tracks MSCI EM ESG Enhanced CTB Index, while USDV.L tracks S&P High Yield Dividend Aristocrats Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for EEDM.L and 0.35% for USDV.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EEDM.L and USDV.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer