EEDM.L vs. IDTW.L
EEDM.L (iShares MSCI EM CTB Enhanced ESG UCITS ETF USD (Dist)) and IDTW.L (iShares MSCI Taiwan UCITS ETF USD (Dist)) are both exchange-traded funds - EEDM.L is a Emerging Markets Equities fund tracking the MSCI EM ESG Enhanced CTB Index, while IDTW.L is a Technology Equities fund tracking the MSCI Taiwan 20/35 Index (Net) (USD). Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, EEDM.L returned 5.67%/yr vs 18.84%/yr for IDTW.L. A 0.78 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. EEDM.L charges 0.18%/yr vs 0.74%/yr for IDTW.L.
Performance
EEDM.L vs. IDTW.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EEDM.L achieves a 15.41% return, which is significantly lower than IDTW.L's 51.77% return.
EEDM.L
- 1D
- -1.89%
- 1M
- -9.56%
- 6M
- 10.23%
- YTD
- 15.41%
- 1Y
- 29.68%
- 3Y*
- 18.64%
- 5Y*
- 5.67%
- 10Y*
- —
IDTW.L
- 1D
- -3.99%
- 1M
- -10.58%
- 6M
- 42.72%
- YTD
- 51.77%
- 1Y
- 73.35%
- 3Y*
- 37.69%
- 5Y*
- 18.84%
- 10Y*
- 19.92%
EEDM.L vs. IDTW.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EEDM.L iShares MSCI EM CTB Enhanced ESG UCITS ETF USD (Dist) | 15.41% | 35.48% | 6.70% | 8.18% | -21.69% | -2.85% | 19.76% | 7.14% |
IDTW.L iShares MSCI Taiwan UCITS ETF USD (Dist) | 51.77% | 31.78% | 23.61% | 28.84% | -29.55% | 28.51% | 34.35% | 11.10% |
Correlation
The correlation between EEDM.L and IDTW.L is 0.85, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.85 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.78 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.78 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 24, 2019 | 0.78 |
The correlation between EEDM.L and IDTW.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.78 to 0.85 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EEDM.L vs. IDTW.L — Risk / Return Rank
EEDM.L
IDTW.L
EEDM.L vs. IDTW.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI EM CTB Enhanced ESG UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (EEDM.L) and iShares MSCI Taiwan UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (IDTW.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| EEDM.L | IDTW.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.24 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.29 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.25 | 1.43 | -0.17 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.20 | 5.05 | -2.84 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.95 | 16.48 | -9.53 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
EEDM.L vs. IDTW.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EEDM.L drawdown since its inception was -40.90%, smaller than the maximum IDTW.L drawdown of -60.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EEDM.L and IDTW.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EEDM.L | IDTW.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -40.90% | -60.07% | +19.17% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.41% | -14.46% | +1.05% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.97% | -28.24% | +11.27% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -36.39% | -40.98% | +4.59% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -40.98% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -11.26% | -14.46% | +3.20% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -16.32% | -12.59% | -3.73% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.26% | 4.44% | -0.18% |
Volatility
EEDM.L vs. IDTW.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares MSCI EM CTB Enhanced ESG UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (EEDM.L) is 9.16%, while iShares MSCI Taiwan UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (IDTW.L) has a volatility of 12.06%. This indicates that EEDM.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IDTW.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EEDM.L | IDTW.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.16% | 12.06% | -2.90% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 20.04% | 24.76% | -4.72% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.98% | 28.27% | -6.29% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.47% | 23.97% | -4.50% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.80% | 22.41% | -1.61% |
EEDM.L vs. IDTW.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
EEDM.L has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is lower than IDTW.L's 0.74% expense ratio.
Dividends
EEDM.L vs. IDTW.L - Dividend Comparison
EEDM.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.69%, more than IDTW.L's 0.99% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EEDM.L iShares MSCI EM CTB Enhanced ESG UCITS ETF USD (Dist) | 1.69% | 1.89% | 2.37% | 2.37% | 2.59% | 1.97% | 1.54% | 0.05% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
IDTW.L iShares MSCI Taiwan UCITS ETF USD (Dist) | 0.99% | 1.51% | 1.43% | 2.09% | 3.39% | 1.35% | 1.73% | 2.15% | 2.78% | 2.70% | 3.10% | 3.33% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EEDM.L and IDTW.L have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, EEDM.L is cheaper at 0.18% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
EEDM.L is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.74% for IDTW.L.
EEDM.L is categorized as Emerging Markets Equities, while IDTW.L is Technology Equities. EEDM.L tracks MSCI EM ESG Enhanced CTB Index, while IDTW.L tracks MSCI Taiwan 20/35 Index (Net) (USD). Their fees differ too: 0.18% for EEDM.L and 0.74% for IDTW.L.
Find the right allocation for EEDM.L and IDTW.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer