PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EEDM.L vs. HSUS.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EEDM.L vs. HSUS.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI EM CTB Enhanced ESG UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (EEDM.L) and HSBC USA Sustainable Equity UCITS ETF USD (HSUS.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

EEDM.L is traded in USD, while HSUS.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the HSUS.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EEDM.L achieves a 15.41% return, which is significantly higher than HSUS.L's 11.96% return.


EEDM.L

1D
-1.89%
1M
-9.56%
6M
10.23%
YTD
15.41%
1Y
29.68%
3Y*
18.64%
5Y*
5.67%
10Y*

HSUS.L

1D
-0.34%
1M
-0.02%
6M
12.33%
YTD
11.96%
1Y
24.88%
3Y*
19.00%
5Y*
11.89%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EEDM.L vs. HSUS.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
EEDM.L
iShares MSCI EM CTB Enhanced ESG UCITS ETF USD (Dist)
15.41%35.48%6.70%8.18%-21.69%-2.85%33.50%
HSUS.L
HSBC USA Sustainable Equity UCITS ETF USD
11.96%19.15%19.77%21.18%-17.59%28.58%-4.65%

Correlation

The correlation between EEDM.L and HSUS.L is 0.58, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.58

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.55

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.57

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 4, 2020

0.56

The correlation between EEDM.L and HSUS.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.55 to 0.58 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EEDM.L vs. HSUS.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EEDM.L
EEDM.L Risk / Return Rank: 5353
Overall Rank
EEDM.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5151
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EEDM.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
EEDM.L Omega Ratio Rank: 5353
Omega Ratio Rank
EEDM.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
EEDM.L Martin Ratio Rank: 5454
Martin Ratio Rank

HSUS.L
HSUS.L Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
HSUS.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HSUS.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
HSUS.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
HSUS.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
HSUS.L Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EEDM.L vs. HSUS.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI EM CTB Enhanced ESG UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (EEDM.L) and HSBC USA Sustainable Equity UCITS ETF USD (HSUS.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


EEDM.LHSUS.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.85

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.25

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.39

-0.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.20

3.10

-0.90

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.95

11.76

-4.81

EEDM.L vs. HSUS.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EEDM.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.35, which is lower than the HSUS.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.19. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EEDM.L and HSUS.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

EEDM.L vs. HSUS.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EEDM.L drawdown since its inception was -40.90%, which is greater than HSUS.L's maximum drawdown of -25.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EEDM.L and HSUS.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EEDM.LHSUS.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-40.90%

-25.41%

-15.49%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.41%

-7.99%

-5.42%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.97%

-20.03%

+3.06%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-36.39%

-25.41%

-10.98%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-11.26%

-2.01%

-9.25%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-16.32%

-7.88%

-8.44%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.26%

2.11%

+2.15%

Volatility

EEDM.L vs. HSUS.L - Volatility Comparison

iShares MSCI EM CTB Enhanced ESG UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (EEDM.L) has a higher volatility of 9.16% compared to HSBC USA Sustainable Equity UCITS ETF USD (HSUS.L) at 3.17%. This indicates that EEDM.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HSUS.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EEDM.LHSUS.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.16%

3.17%

+5.99%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

20.04%

8.93%

+11.11%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.98%

11.35%

+10.63%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.47%

24.54%

-5.07%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.80%

24.68%

-3.88%

EEDM.L vs. HSUS.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

EEDM.L has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is higher than HSUS.L's 0.12% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

EEDM.L vs. HSUS.L - Dividend Comparison

EEDM.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.69%, while HSUS.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019
EEDM.L
iShares MSCI EM CTB Enhanced ESG UCITS ETF USD (Dist)
1.69%1.89%2.37%2.37%2.59%1.97%1.54%0.05%
HSUS.L
HSBC USA Sustainable Equity UCITS ETF USD
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


EEDM.L and HSUS.L have a correlation of 0.58, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, HSUS.L is cheaper at 0.12% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

HSUS.L is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.18% for EEDM.L.

EEDM.L is categorized as Emerging Markets Equities, while HSUS.L is Large Cap Blend Equities. EEDM.L tracks MSCI EM ESG Enhanced CTB Index, while HSUS.L tracks Russell 1000 TR USD. They also come from different issuers: iShares and HSBC. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for EEDM.L and 0.12% for HSUS.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EEDM.L and HSUS.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer