PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EEDM.L vs. CAPS.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EEDM.L vs. CAPS.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI EM CTB Enhanced ESG UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (EEDM.L) and First Trust Capital Strength UCITS ETF Acc (CAPS.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

EEDM.L is traded in USD, while CAPS.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the CAPS.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EEDM.L achieves a 15.41% return, which is significantly higher than CAPS.L's 5.13% return.


EEDM.L

1D
-1.89%
1M
-9.56%
6M
10.23%
YTD
15.41%
1Y
29.68%
3Y*
18.64%
5Y*
5.67%
10Y*

CAPS.L

1D
0.00%
1M
4.58%
6M
1.87%
YTD
5.13%
1Y
8.47%
3Y*
9.77%
5Y*
5.91%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EEDM.L vs. CAPS.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
EEDM.L
iShares MSCI EM CTB Enhanced ESG UCITS ETF USD (Dist)
15.41%35.48%6.70%8.18%-21.69%-2.85%18.23%
CAPS.L
First Trust Capital Strength UCITS ETF Acc
5.13%6.85%11.11%7.62%-10.23%-7.56%16.40%

Correlation

The correlation between EEDM.L and CAPS.L is -0.03, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.03

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.19

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.31

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 23, 2020

0.34

The correlation between EEDM.L and CAPS.L shifts across timeframes, from -0.03 (1 year) to 0.34 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EEDM.L vs. CAPS.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EEDM.L
EEDM.L Risk / Return Rank: 5353
Overall Rank
EEDM.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5151
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EEDM.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
EEDM.L Omega Ratio Rank: 5353
Omega Ratio Rank
EEDM.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
EEDM.L Martin Ratio Rank: 5454
Martin Ratio Rank

CAPS.L
CAPS.L Risk / Return Rank: 4747
Overall Rank
CAPS.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1010
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CAPS.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 100100
Sortino Ratio Rank
CAPS.L Omega Ratio Rank: 100100
Omega Ratio Rank
CAPS.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 1111
Calmar Ratio Rank
CAPS.L Martin Ratio Rank: 1212
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EEDM.L vs. CAPS.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI EM CTB Enhanced ESG UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (EEDM.L) and First Trust Capital Strength UCITS ETF Acc (CAPS.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


EEDM.LCAPS.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.34

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-137.95

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

78.39

-77.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.20

0.09

+2.12

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.95

0.34

+6.61

EEDM.L vs. CAPS.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EEDM.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.35, which is higher than the CAPS.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.00. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EEDM.L and CAPS.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

EEDM.L vs. CAPS.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EEDM.L drawdown since its inception was -40.90%, smaller than the maximum CAPS.L drawdown of -99.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EEDM.L and CAPS.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EEDM.LCAPS.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-40.90%

-99.12%

+58.22%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.41%

-99.04%

+85.63%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.97%

-99.04%

+82.07%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-36.39%

-99.04%

+62.65%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-11.26%

-4.42%

-6.84%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-16.32%

-18.77%

+2.45%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.26%

25.17%

-20.91%

Volatility

EEDM.L vs. CAPS.L - Volatility Comparison

iShares MSCI EM CTB Enhanced ESG UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (EEDM.L) has a higher volatility of 9.16% compared to First Trust Capital Strength UCITS ETF Acc (CAPS.L) at 3.33%. This indicates that EEDM.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CAPS.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EEDM.LCAPS.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.16%

3.33%

+5.83%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

20.04%

7.40%

+12.64%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.98%

13,939.21%

-13,917.23%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.47%

6,243.40%

-6,223.93%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.80%

5,481.36%

-5,460.56%

EEDM.L vs. CAPS.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

EEDM.L has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is lower than CAPS.L's 0.60% expense ratio.


Dividends

EEDM.L vs. CAPS.L - Dividend Comparison

EEDM.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.69%, while CAPS.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019
CAPS.L
First Trust Capital Strength UCITS ETF Acc
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
EEDM.L
iShares MSCI EM CTB Enhanced ESG UCITS ETF USD (Dist)
1.69%1.89%2.37%2.37%2.59%1.97%1.54%0.05%

Frequently Asked Questions


EEDM.L and CAPS.L have a correlation of -0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, EEDM.L is cheaper at 0.18% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

EEDM.L is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for CAPS.L.

EEDM.L is categorized as Emerging Markets Equities, while CAPS.L is Large Cap Blend Equities. EEDM.L tracks MSCI EM ESG Enhanced CTB Index, while CAPS.L tracks Russell 1000 TR USD. They also come from different issuers: iShares and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for EEDM.L and 0.60% for CAPS.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EEDM.L and CAPS.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer