PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EEA vs. BIAHX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EEA vs. BIAHX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in The European Equity Fund (EEA) and Brown Advisory - WMC Strategic European Equity Fund (BIAHX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EEA achieves a 9.24% return, which is significantly higher than BIAHX's 4.98% return. Over the past 10 years, EEA has underperformed BIAHX with an annualized return of 8.64%, while BIAHX has yielded a comparatively higher 12.27% annualized return.


EEA

1D
-0.36%
1M
-0.30%
6M
2.75%
YTD
9.24%
1Y
20.19%
3Y*
12.43%
5Y*
7.12%
10Y*
8.64%
ALL TIME*
5.13%

BIAHX

1D
0.59%
1M
3.31%
6M
-0.58%
YTD
4.98%
1Y
12.99%
3Y*
21.01%
5Y*
12.50%
10Y*
12.27%
ALL TIME*
9.84%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$209.10K$314.31K$440.77K

EEA vs. BIAHX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
EEA
The European Equity Fund
9.24%36.10%-3.53%17.24%-18.97%14.19%13.54%28.55%-21.00%29.01%
BIAHX
Brown Advisory - WMC Strategic European Equity Fund
4.98%47.26%10.85%19.36%-11.95%14.54%11.34%29.43%-16.60%32.37%

Correlation

The correlation between EEA and BIAHX is 0.72, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.72

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.67

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.68

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.65

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 23, 2013

0.66

The correlation between EEA and BIAHX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.65 to 0.72 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EEA vs. BIAHX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

EEA
EEA Risk / Return Rank: 3535
Overall Rank
EEA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3939
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EEA Sortino Ratio Rank: 3838
Sortino Ratio Rank
EEA Omega Ratio Rank: 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
EEA Calmar Ratio Rank: 3131
Calmar Ratio Rank
EEA Martin Ratio Rank: 3131
Martin Ratio Rank

BIAHX
BIAHX Risk / Return Rank: 2525
Overall Rank
BIAHX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2828
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BIAHX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
BIAHX Omega Ratio Rank: 2828
Omega Ratio Rank
BIAHX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2121
Calmar Ratio Rank
BIAHX Martin Ratio Rank: 1919
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

EEA vs. BIAHX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for The European Equity Fund (EEA) and Brown Advisory - WMC Strategic European Equity Fund (BIAHX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


EEABIAHXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.32

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.38

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.22

1.17

+0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.46

0.99

+0.47

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.76

2.60

+2.16

EEA vs. BIAHX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EEA Sharpe Ratio is 1.24, which is higher than the BIAHX Sharpe Ratio of 0.92. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EEA and BIAHX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

EEA vs. BIAHX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EEA drawdown since its inception was -72.28%, which is greater than BIAHX's maximum drawdown of -34.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EEA and BIAHX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EEABIAHXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-72.28%

-34.90%

-37.38%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.45%

-13.18%

-0.27%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.10%

-13.18%

-0.92%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-37.51%

-30.95%

-6.56%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-41.54%

-34.90%

-6.64%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.08%

-3.10%

+2.02%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-29.69%

-6.03%

-23.66%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.12%

5.00%

-0.88%

Volatility

EEA vs. BIAHX - Volatility Comparison

The European Equity Fund (EEA) has a higher volatility of 4.56% compared to Brown Advisory - WMC Strategic European Equity Fund (BIAHX) at 4.07%. This indicates that EEA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BIAHX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EEABIAHXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.56%

4.07%

+0.49%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.18%

12.14%

+1.04%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.85%

14.22%

+1.63%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.12%

16.40%

+1.72%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.40%

16.89%

+2.51%

EEA vs. BIAHX - Expense Ratio Comparison

EEA has a 0.01% expense ratio, which is lower than BIAHX's 1.19% expense ratio.


Dividends

EEA vs. BIAHX - Dividend Comparison

EEA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.79%, more than BIAHX's 7.24% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BIAHX
Brown Advisory - WMC Strategic European Equity Fund
7.24%7.60%5.16%1.13%2.66%9.72%6.39%9.78%12.12%0.83%1.19%0.00%
EEA
The European Equity Fund
8.79%7.55%2.19%1.99%11.60%14.42%1.86%5.49%0.95%0.87%0.97%2.10%

Frequently Asked Questions


EEA and BIAHX have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

EEA has higher volatility (4.56%) compared to BIAHX (4.07%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EEA dropped -72.28% vs BIAHX's -34.90%.

EEA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.24 vs 0.92), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EEA and BIAHX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer