EDT.TO vs. BRK.TO
EDT.TO (Spectral Medical Inc.) and BRK.TO (Berkshire Hathaway CDR (CAD Hedged)) are both stocks. EDT.TO operates in Diagnostics & Research (Healthcare), while BRK.TO operates in Insurance - Diversified (Financial Services). Over the past year, EDT.TO returned 71.95% vs -4.86% for BRK.TO. At a correlation of -0.02, they often move in opposite directions.
Performance
EDT.TO vs. BRK.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EDT.TO achieves a -2.08% return, which is significantly higher than BRK.TO's -5.68% return.
EDT.TO
- 1D
- 1.44%
- 1M
- 1.44%
- YTD
- -2.08%
- 6M
- 11.02%
- 1Y
- 71.95%
- 3Y*
- 66.59%
- 5Y*
- 26.23%
- 10Y*
- 3.92%
BRK.TO
- 1D
- 0.52%
- 1M
- 2.56%
- YTD
- -5.68%
- 6M
- -5.99%
- 1Y
- -4.86%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
EDT.TO vs. BRK.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
EDT.TO Spectral Medical Inc. | -2.08% | 140.00% |
BRK.TO Berkshire Hathaway CDR (CAD Hedged) | -5.68% | 3.71% |
Correlation
The correlation between EDT.TO and BRK.TO is -0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.09 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 6, 2025 | -0.02 |
Fundamentals
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EDT.TO vs. BRK.TO — Risk / Return Rank
EDT.TO
BRK.TO
EDT.TO vs. BRK.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Spectral Medical Inc. (EDT.TO) and Berkshire Hathaway CDR (CAD Hedged) (BRK.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EDT.TO | BRK.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.69 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +3.11 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.30 | 0.95 | +0.35 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.48 | -0.47 | +2.95 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.90 | -0.97 | +4.88 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EDT.TO | BRK.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.32 | -0.36 | +1.69 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.41 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.05 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.08 | -0.10 | +0.02 |
Drawdowns
EDT.TO vs. BRK.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EDT.TO drawdown since its inception was -99.64%, which is greater than BRK.TO's maximum drawdown of -15.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EDT.TO and BRK.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EDT.TO | BRK.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.64% | -15.81% | -83.83% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -29.14% | -10.39% | -18.75% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -40.30% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -60.19% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -89.95% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -93.07% | -13.66% | -79.41% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -92.40% | -8.94% | -83.46% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 18.49% | 5.01% | +13.48% |
Volatility
EDT.TO vs. BRK.TO - Volatility Comparison
Spectral Medical Inc. (EDT.TO) has a higher volatility of 8.84% compared to Berkshire Hathaway CDR (CAD Hedged) (BRK.TO) at 3.28%. This indicates that EDT.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BRK.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EDT.TO | BRK.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.84% | 3.28% | +5.56% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 27.17% | 10.15% | +17.02% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 54.67% | 13.51% | +41.16% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 64.77% | 17.46% | +47.31% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 78.77% | 17.46% | +61.31% |
Dividends
EDT.TO vs. BRK.TO - Dividend Comparison
Neither EDT.TO nor BRK.TO has paid dividends to shareholders.
Financials
EDT.TO vs. BRK.TO - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Spectral Medical Inc. and Berkshire Hathaway CDR (CAD Hedged). You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
EDT.TO and BRK.TO have a correlation of -0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for EDT.TO and BRK.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer