EDOC vs. SPAQ
Compare and contrast key facts about Global X Telemedicine & Digital Health ETF (EDOC) and Horizon Kinetics SPAC Active ETF (SPAQ).
EDOC and SPAQ are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. EDOC is a passively managed fund by Global X that tracks the performance of the Solactive Telemedicine & Digital Health Index- TR Net. It was launched on Jul 29, 2020. SPAQ is an actively managed fund by Horizon. It was launched on Jun 29, 2007.
Performance
EDOC vs. SPAQ - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
EDOC vs. SPAQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
EDOC Global X Telemedicine & Digital Health ETF | -18.45% | -0.62% | -2.87% | -17.86% |
SPAQ Horizon Kinetics SPAC Active ETF | 0.06% | 7.35% | 4.33% | 5.52% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EDOC achieves a -18.45% return, which is significantly lower than SPAQ's 0.06% return.
EDOC
- 1D
- 2.83%
- 1M
- -10.48%
- YTD
- -18.45%
- 6M
- -25.27%
- 1Y
- -15.69%
- 3Y*
- -12.07%
- 5Y*
- -16.45%
- 10Y*
- —
SPAQ
- 1D
- 0.62%
- 1M
- -0.24%
- YTD
- 0.06%
- 6M
- 1.51%
- 1Y
- 4.82%
- 3Y*
- 5.22%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
EDOC vs. SPAQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
EDOC has a 0.68% expense ratio, which is lower than SPAQ's 0.85% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
EDOC vs. SPAQ — Risk / Return Rank
EDOC
SPAQ
EDOC vs. SPAQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Telemedicine & Digital Health ETF (EDOC) and Horizon Kinetics SPAC Active ETF (SPAQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EDOC | SPAQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.64 | 0.56 | -1.20 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.81 | 0.84 | -1.65 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.91 | 1.13 | -0.22 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.49 | 0.98 | -1.47 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.38 | 3.66 | -5.05 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EDOC | SPAQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.64 | 0.56 | -1.20 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.63 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.42 | 0.78 | -1.20 |
Correlation
The correlation between EDOC and SPAQ is 0.08, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
EDOC vs. SPAQ - Dividend Comparison
EDOC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.40%, less than SPAQ's 16.68% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EDOC Global X Telemedicine & Digital Health ETF | 0.40% | 0.33% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.03% |
SPAQ Horizon Kinetics SPAC Active ETF | 16.68% | 16.69% | 3.00% | 2.60% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
EDOC vs. SPAQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EDOC drawdown since its inception was -65.76%, which is greater than SPAQ's maximum drawdown of -5.30%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EDOC and SPAQ.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| EDOC | SPAQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -65.76% | -5.30% | -60.46% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -30.71% | -5.30% | -25.41% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -61.76% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -64.79% | -1.97% | -62.82% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -42.40% | -0.53% | -41.87% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 10.89% | 1.41% | +9.48% |
Volatility
EDOC vs. SPAQ - Volatility Comparison
Global X Telemedicine & Digital Health ETF (EDOC) has a higher volatility of 7.53% compared to Horizon Kinetics SPAC Active ETF (SPAQ) at 1.75%. This indicates that EDOC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPAQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| EDOC | SPAQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.53% | 1.75% | +5.78% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.50% | 6.25% | +10.25% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 24.65% | 8.60% | +16.05% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 26.35% | 7.04% | +19.31% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 26.33% | 7.04% | +19.29% |