EDMW.DE vs. AASG.L
EDMW.DE (iShares MSCI World ESG Enhanced UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) and AASG.L (Amundi MSCI Emerging Markets Asia UCITS ETF USD) are both exchange-traded funds - EDMW.DE is a Global Equities fund tracking the MSCI World ESG Enhanced Focus, while AASG.L is a Asia Pacific Equities fund tracking the MSCI AC Asia Ex Japan NR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, EDMW.DE returned 11.55%/yr vs 8.84%/yr for AASG.L. A 0.59 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. Both charge a 0.20% expense ratio.
Performance
EDMW.DE vs. AASG.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
EDMW.DE is traded in EUR, while AASG.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the AASG.L values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EDMW.DE achieves a 10.19% return, which is significantly lower than AASG.L's 31.65% return.
EDMW.DE
- 1D
- 0.06%
- 1M
- 4.92%
- YTD
- 10.19%
- 6M
- 10.70%
- 1Y
- 22.10%
- 3Y*
- 16.27%
- 5Y*
- 11.55%
- 10Y*
- —
AASG.L
- 1D
- -1.90%
- 1M
- 7.80%
- YTD
- 31.65%
- 6M
- 34.35%
- 1Y
- 55.12%
- 3Y*
- 22.77%
- 5Y*
- 8.84%
- 10Y*
- 11.05%
EDMW.DE vs. AASG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EDMW.DE iShares MSCI World ESG Enhanced UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 10.19% | 6.42% | 25.12% | 18.98% | -15.82% | 33.40% | 6.84% | 12.25% |
AASG.L Amundi MSCI Emerging Markets Asia UCITS ETF USD | 31.68% | 17.37% | 19.54% | 2.83% | -16.07% | 1.71% | 17.30% | 4.34% |
Correlation
The correlation between EDMW.DE and AASG.L is 0.61, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.61 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.57 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.55 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 23, 2019 | 0.59 |
The correlation between EDMW.DE and AASG.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.55 to 0.61 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EDMW.DE vs. AASG.L — Risk / Return Rank
EDMW.DE
AASG.L
EDMW.DE vs. AASG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI World ESG Enhanced UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (EDMW.DE) and Amundi MSCI Emerging Markets Asia UCITS ETF USD (AASG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EDMW.DE | AASG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.94 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.10 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.36 | 1.50 | -0.14 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.07 | 4.65 | -1.59 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.11 | 16.81 | -4.70 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EDMW.DE | AASG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.93 | 2.87 | -0.94 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.80 | 0.48 | +0.32 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.59 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.78 | 0.61 | +0.17 |
Drawdowns
EDMW.DE vs. AASG.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EDMW.DE drawdown since its inception was -33.12%, roughly equal to the maximum AASG.L drawdown of -33.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EDMW.DE and AASG.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EDMW.DE | AASG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.12% | -33.32% | +0.20% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.18% | -11.79% | +4.61% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -21.20% | -19.21% | -1.99% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.20% | -28.81% | +7.61% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -33.32% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.32% | -2.91% | +2.59% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.12% | -10.27% | +5.15% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.82% | 3.27% | -1.45% |
Volatility
EDMW.DE vs. AASG.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares MSCI World ESG Enhanced UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (EDMW.DE) is 2.75%, while Amundi MSCI Emerging Markets Asia UCITS ETF USD (AASG.L) has a volatility of 8.39%. This indicates that EDMW.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AASG.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EDMW.DE | AASG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.75% | 8.39% | -5.64% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.83% | 15.94% | -8.11% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.41% | 19.13% | -7.72% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.23% | 18.23% | -4.00% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.27% | 18.92% | -2.65% |
EDMW.DE vs. AASG.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both EDMW.DE and AASG.L have an expense ratio of 0.20%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
EDMW.DE vs. AASG.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither EDMW.DE nor AASG.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
EDMW.DE and AASG.L have a correlation of 0.61, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Both ETFs have the same 0.20% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
EDMW.DE and AASG.L have the same expense ratio: 0.20% per year.
EDMW.DE is categorized as Global Equities, while AASG.L is Asia Pacific Equities. EDMW.DE tracks MSCI World ESG Enhanced Focus, while AASG.L tracks MSCI AC Asia Ex Japan NR USD. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Amundi.
Find the right allocation for EDMW.DE and AASG.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer