PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EDMU.DE vs. QDVE.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EDMU.DE vs. QDVE.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in iShares MSCI USA ESG Enhanced UCITS ETF USD Acc (EDMU.DE) and iShares S&P 500 Information Technology Sector UCITS ETF (QDVE.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EDMU.DE achieves a 10.40% return, which is significantly lower than QDVE.DE's 24.06% return.


EDMU.DE

1D
-0.09%
1M
5.49%
YTD
10.40%
6M
10.34%
1Y
23.34%
3Y*
17.44%
5Y*
12.84%
10Y*

QDVE.DE

1D
-2.26%
1M
13.91%
YTD
24.06%
6M
23.05%
1Y
49.27%
3Y*
30.81%
5Y*
25.33%
10Y*
26.04%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EDMU.DE vs. QDVE.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
EDMU.DE
iShares MSCI USA ESG Enhanced UCITS ETF USD Acc
10.40%2.64%31.12%22.05%-17.35%38.97%10.90%13.90%
QDVE.DE
iShares S&P 500 Information Technology Sector UCITS ETF
24.06%9.99%46.12%54.14%-25.83%46.77%29.69%20.29%

Correlation

The correlation between EDMU.DE and QDVE.DE is 0.86, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.86

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.86

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.88

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 23, 2019

0.88

The correlation between EDMU.DE and QDVE.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.86 to 0.88 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EDMU.DE vs. QDVE.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EDMU.DE
EDMU.DE Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
EDMU.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EDMU.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
EDMU.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
EDMU.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
EDMU.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 5858
Martin Ratio Rank

QDVE.DE
QDVE.DE Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
QDVE.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QDVE.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
QDVE.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
QDVE.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
QDVE.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 5050
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EDMU.DE vs. QDVE.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI USA ESG Enhanced UCITS ETF USD Acc (EDMU.DE) and iShares S&P 500 Information Technology Sector UCITS ETF (QDVE.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EDMU.DEQDVE.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.45

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.42

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

1.39

-0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.85

3.14

-0.29

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.88

8.31

+1.57

EDMU.DE vs. QDVE.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EDMU.DE Sharpe Ratio is 1.95, which is comparable to the QDVE.DE Sharpe Ratio of 2.40. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EDMU.DE and QDVE.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EDMU.DEQDVE.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.95

2.40

-0.45

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.82

1.10

-0.29

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.19

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.83

1.07

-0.24

Drawdowns

EDMU.DE vs. QDVE.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EDMU.DE drawdown since its inception was -33.43%, which is greater than QDVE.DE's maximum drawdown of -31.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EDMU.DE and QDVE.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EDMU.DEQDVE.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.43%

-31.45%

-1.98%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.15%

-15.59%

+7.44%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.12%

-29.83%

+5.71%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.12%

-29.83%

+5.71%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-31.45%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.41%

-3.08%

+2.67%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.36%

-5.80%

+0.44%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.36%

5.91%

-3.55%

Volatility

EDMU.DE vs. QDVE.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares MSCI USA ESG Enhanced UCITS ETF USD Acc (EDMU.DE) is 2.69%, while iShares S&P 500 Information Technology Sector UCITS ETF (QDVE.DE) has a volatility of 7.12%. This indicates that EDMU.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QDVE.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EDMU.DEQDVE.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.69%

7.12%

-4.43%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.80%

14.85%

-7.05%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.93%

20.42%

-8.49%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.55%

22.71%

-7.16%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.39%

21.73%

-4.34%

EDMU.DE vs. QDVE.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

EDMU.DE has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is lower than QDVE.DE's 0.15% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

EDMU.DE vs. QDVE.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither EDMU.DE nor QDVE.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


EDMU.DE and QDVE.DE have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, EDMU.DE is cheaper at 0.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

EDMU.DE is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for QDVE.DE.

EDMU.DE is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while QDVE.DE is Technology Equities. EDMU.DE tracks MSCI USA ESG Enhanced Focus, while QDVE.DE tracks S&P 500 Capped 35/20 Information Technology Index. Their fees differ too: 0.07% for EDMU.DE and 0.15% for QDVE.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EDMU.DE and QDVE.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer