EDMU.DE vs. IUSQ.DE
EDMU.DE (iShares MSCI USA ESG Enhanced UCITS ETF USD Acc) and IUSQ.DE (iShares MSCI ACWI UCITS ETF (Acc)) are both exchange-traded funds - EDMU.DE is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the MSCI USA ESG Enhanced Focus, while IUSQ.DE is a Global Equities fund tracking the MSCI All Country World (ACWI). Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, EDMU.DE returned 12.84%/yr vs 12.42%/yr for IUSQ.DE. With a 0.96 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. EDMU.DE charges 0.07%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for IUSQ.DE.
Performance
EDMU.DE vs. IUSQ.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EDMU.DE achieves a 10.40% return, which is significantly lower than IUSQ.DE's 12.65% return.
EDMU.DE
- 1D
- -0.09%
- 1M
- 5.49%
- YTD
- 10.40%
- 6M
- 10.34%
- 1Y
- 23.34%
- 3Y*
- 17.44%
- 5Y*
- 12.84%
- 10Y*
- —
IUSQ.DE
- 1D
- -0.23%
- 1M
- 5.01%
- YTD
- 12.65%
- 6M
- 13.33%
- 1Y
- 26.56%
- 3Y*
- 17.93%
- 5Y*
- 12.42%
- 10Y*
- 12.38%
EDMU.DE vs. IUSQ.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EDMU.DE iShares MSCI USA ESG Enhanced UCITS ETF USD Acc | 10.40% | 2.64% | 31.12% | 22.05% | -17.35% | 38.97% | 10.90% | 13.90% |
IUSQ.DE iShares MSCI ACWI UCITS ETF (Acc) | 12.65% | 9.02% | 24.53% | 18.57% | -13.58% | 29.13% | 4.94% | 10.93% |
Correlation
The correlation between EDMU.DE and IUSQ.DE is 0.95, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.95 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.95 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.96 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 23, 2019 | 0.96 |
The correlation between EDMU.DE and IUSQ.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.95 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EDMU.DE vs. IUSQ.DE — Risk / Return Rank
EDMU.DE
IUSQ.DE
EDMU.DE vs. IUSQ.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI USA ESG Enhanced UCITS ETF USD Acc (EDMU.DE) and iShares MSCI ACWI UCITS ETF (Acc) (IUSQ.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EDMU.DE | IUSQ.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.36 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.53 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.36 | 1.43 | -0.07 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.85 | 4.08 | -1.23 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.88 | 16.69 | -6.81 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EDMU.DE | IUSQ.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.95 | 2.31 | -0.36 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.82 | 0.88 | -0.06 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.82 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.83 | 0.76 | +0.07 |
Drawdowns
EDMU.DE vs. IUSQ.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EDMU.DE drawdown since its inception was -33.43%, roughly equal to the maximum IUSQ.DE drawdown of -33.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EDMU.DE and IUSQ.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EDMU.DE | IUSQ.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.43% | -33.60% | +0.17% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.15% | -6.48% | -1.67% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -24.12% | -21.25% | -2.87% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.12% | -21.25% | -2.87% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -33.60% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.41% | -0.55% | +0.14% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.36% | -4.19% | -1.17% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.36% | 1.59% | +0.77% |
Volatility
EDMU.DE vs. IUSQ.DE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares MSCI USA ESG Enhanced UCITS ETF USD Acc (EDMU.DE) is 2.69%, while iShares MSCI ACWI UCITS ETF (Acc) (IUSQ.DE) has a volatility of 3.03%. This indicates that EDMU.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IUSQ.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EDMU.DE | IUSQ.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.69% | 3.03% | -0.34% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.80% | 8.26% | -0.46% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.93% | 11.47% | +0.46% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.55% | 13.94% | +1.61% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.39% | 15.02% | +2.37% |
EDMU.DE vs. IUSQ.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
EDMU.DE has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is lower than IUSQ.DE's 0.20% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
EDMU.DE vs. IUSQ.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither EDMU.DE nor IUSQ.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.95, EDMU.DE and IUSQ.DE move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, EDMU.DE is cheaper at 0.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
EDMU.DE is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for IUSQ.DE.
EDMU.DE is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while IUSQ.DE is Global Equities. EDMU.DE tracks MSCI USA ESG Enhanced Focus, while IUSQ.DE tracks MSCI All Country World (ACWI). Their fees differ too: 0.07% for EDMU.DE and 0.20% for IUSQ.DE.
Find the right allocation for EDMU.DE and IUSQ.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer