EDMU.DE vs. EUNL.DE
EDMU.DE (iShares MSCI USA ESG Enhanced UCITS ETF USD Acc) and EUNL.DE (iShares Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) are both exchange-traded funds - EDMU.DE is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the MSCI USA ESG Enhanced Focus, while EUNL.DE is a Global Equities fund tracking the MSCI World Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, EDMU.DE returned 12.84%/yr vs 12.89%/yr for EUNL.DE. With a 0.97 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. EDMU.DE charges 0.07%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for EUNL.DE.
Performance
EDMU.DE vs. EUNL.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with EDMU.DE having a 10.40% return and EUNL.DE slightly higher at 10.86%.
EDMU.DE
- 1D
- -0.09%
- 1M
- 5.49%
- YTD
- 10.40%
- 6M
- 10.34%
- 1Y
- 23.34%
- 3Y*
- 17.44%
- 5Y*
- 12.84%
- 10Y*
- —
EUNL.DE
- 1D
- 0.02%
- 1M
- 4.80%
- YTD
- 10.86%
- 6M
- 11.29%
- 1Y
- 23.80%
- 3Y*
- 17.55%
- 5Y*
- 12.89%
- 10Y*
- 12.82%
EDMU.DE vs. EUNL.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EDMU.DE iShares MSCI USA ESG Enhanced UCITS ETF USD Acc | 10.40% | 2.64% | 31.12% | 22.05% | -17.35% | 38.97% | 10.90% | 13.90% |
EUNL.DE iShares Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 10.86% | 7.90% | 25.93% | 20.13% | -13.59% | 32.71% | 5.48% | 11.45% |
Correlation
The correlation between EDMU.DE and EUNL.DE is 0.96 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.96 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.96 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.97 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 23, 2019 | 0.97 |
The correlation between EDMU.DE and EUNL.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.96 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EDMU.DE vs. EUNL.DE — Risk / Return Rank
EDMU.DE
EUNL.DE
EDMU.DE vs. EUNL.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI USA ESG Enhanced UCITS ETF USD Acc (EDMU.DE) and iShares Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (EUNL.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EDMU.DE | EUNL.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.17 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.29 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.36 | 1.40 | -0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.85 | 3.64 | -0.79 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.88 | 14.52 | -4.64 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EDMU.DE | EUNL.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.95 | 2.12 | -0.17 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.82 | 0.90 | -0.08 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.84 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.83 | 0.82 | +0.01 |
Drawdowns
EDMU.DE vs. EUNL.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EDMU.DE drawdown since its inception was -33.43%, roughly equal to the maximum EUNL.DE drawdown of -33.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EDMU.DE and EUNL.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EDMU.DE | EUNL.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.43% | -33.63% | +0.20% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.15% | -6.50% | -1.65% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -24.12% | -21.73% | -2.39% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.12% | -21.73% | -2.39% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -33.63% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.41% | -0.31% | -0.10% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.36% | -4.25% | -1.11% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.36% | 1.64% | +0.72% |
Volatility
EDMU.DE vs. EUNL.DE - Volatility Comparison
iShares MSCI USA ESG Enhanced UCITS ETF USD Acc (EDMU.DE) and iShares Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (EUNL.DE) have volatilities of 2.69% and 2.62%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EDMU.DE | EUNL.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.69% | 2.62% | +0.07% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.80% | 7.72% | +0.08% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.93% | 11.16% | +0.77% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.55% | 14.17% | +1.38% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.39% | 15.17% | +2.22% |
EDMU.DE vs. EUNL.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
EDMU.DE has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is lower than EUNL.DE's 0.20% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
EDMU.DE vs. EUNL.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither EDMU.DE nor EUNL.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.96, EDMU.DE and EUNL.DE move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, EDMU.DE is cheaper at 0.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
EDMU.DE is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for EUNL.DE.
EDMU.DE is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while EUNL.DE is Global Equities. EDMU.DE tracks MSCI USA ESG Enhanced Focus, while EUNL.DE tracks MSCI World Index. Their fees differ too: 0.07% for EDMU.DE and 0.20% for EUNL.DE.
Find the right allocation for EDMU.DE and EUNL.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer