EDMU.DE vs. CSY2.DE
EDMU.DE (iShares MSCI USA ESG Enhanced UCITS ETF USD Acc) and CSY2.DE (CSIF (IE) MSCI USA ESG Leaders Blue UCITS ETF B USD) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds - EDMU.DE tracks the MSCI USA ESG Enhanced Focus while CSY2.DE tracks the MSCI USA ESG Leaders. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, EDMU.DE returned 12.84%/yr vs 14.65%/yr for CSY2.DE. Their correlation of 0.94 suggests significant overlap in exposure. EDMU.DE charges 0.07%/yr vs 0.10%/yr for CSY2.DE.
Performance
EDMU.DE vs. CSY2.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with EDMU.DE having a 10.40% return and CSY2.DE slightly higher at 10.74%.
EDMU.DE
- 1D
- -0.09%
- 1M
- 5.49%
- YTD
- 10.40%
- 6M
- 10.34%
- 1Y
- 23.34%
- 3Y*
- 17.44%
- 5Y*
- 12.84%
- 10Y*
- —
CSY2.DE
- 1D
- 0.76%
- 1M
- 5.76%
- YTD
- 10.74%
- 6M
- 11.43%
- 1Y
- 26.36%
- 3Y*
- 19.25%
- 5Y*
- 14.65%
- 10Y*
- —
EDMU.DE vs. CSY2.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EDMU.DE iShares MSCI USA ESG Enhanced UCITS ETF USD Acc | 10.40% | 2.64% | 31.12% | 22.05% | -17.35% | 38.97% | 39.20% |
CSY2.DE CSIF (IE) MSCI USA ESG Leaders Blue UCITS ETF B USD | 10.74% | 6.30% | 30.42% | 25.14% | -16.59% | 44.53% | 36.31% |
Correlation
The correlation between EDMU.DE and CSY2.DE is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.94 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.94 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.94 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 18, 2020 | 0.94 |
The correlation between EDMU.DE and CSY2.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.94 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EDMU.DE vs. CSY2.DE — Risk / Return Rank
EDMU.DE
CSY2.DE
EDMU.DE vs. CSY2.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI USA ESG Enhanced UCITS ETF USD Acc (EDMU.DE) and CSIF (IE) MSCI USA ESG Leaders Blue UCITS ETF B USD (CSY2.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EDMU.DE | CSY2.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.15 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.18 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.36 | 1.38 | -0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.85 | 2.87 | -0.02 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.88 | 10.08 | -0.20 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EDMU.DE | CSY2.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.95 | 2.10 | -0.15 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.82 | 0.90 | -0.08 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.83 | 1.18 | -0.35 |
Drawdowns
EDMU.DE vs. CSY2.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EDMU.DE drawdown since its inception was -33.43%, which is greater than CSY2.DE's maximum drawdown of -24.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EDMU.DE and CSY2.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EDMU.DE | CSY2.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.43% | -24.56% | -8.87% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.15% | -9.14% | +0.99% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -24.12% | -24.56% | +0.44% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.12% | -24.56% | +0.44% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.41% | -0.02% | -0.39% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.36% | -4.64% | -0.72% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.36% | 2.61% | -0.25% |
Volatility
EDMU.DE vs. CSY2.DE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares MSCI USA ESG Enhanced UCITS ETF USD Acc (EDMU.DE) is 2.69%, while CSIF (IE) MSCI USA ESG Leaders Blue UCITS ETF B USD (CSY2.DE) has a volatility of 3.21%. This indicates that EDMU.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CSY2.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EDMU.DE | CSY2.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.69% | 3.21% | -0.52% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.80% | 8.56% | -0.76% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.93% | 12.52% | -0.59% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.55% | 16.24% | -0.69% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.39% | 17.19% | +0.20% |
EDMU.DE vs. CSY2.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
EDMU.DE has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is lower than CSY2.DE's 0.10% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
EDMU.DE vs. CSY2.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither EDMU.DE nor CSY2.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.94, EDMU.DE and CSY2.DE move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, EDMU.DE is cheaper at 0.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
EDMU.DE is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.10% for CSY2.DE.
EDMU.DE tracks MSCI USA ESG Enhanced Focus, while CSY2.DE tracks MSCI USA ESG Leaders. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Credit Suisse. Their fees differ too: 0.07% for EDMU.DE and 0.10% for CSY2.DE.
Find the right allocation for EDMU.DE and CSY2.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer