PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EDM4.DE vs. DBXI.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EDM4.DE vs. DBXI.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in iShares MSCI EMU ESG Enhanced UCITS ETF EUR Acc (EDM4.DE) and Xtrackers FTSE MIB UCITS ETF (DBXI.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EDM4.DE achieves a 8.82% return, which is significantly lower than DBXI.DE's 14.49% return.


EDM4.DE

1D
0.51%
1M
2.53%
YTD
8.82%
6M
10.65%
1Y
17.25%
3Y*
15.37%
5Y*
9.91%
10Y*

DBXI.DE

1D
0.21%
1M
2.55%
YTD
14.49%
6M
18.42%
1Y
29.63%
3Y*
28.95%
5Y*
19.73%
10Y*
14.91%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EDM4.DE vs. DBXI.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
EDM4.DE
iShares MSCI EMU ESG Enhanced UCITS ETF EUR Acc
8.82%22.13%9.89%18.31%-12.80%22.20%1.30%8.96%
DBXI.DE
Xtrackers FTSE MIB UCITS ETF
14.49%37.50%18.27%33.40%-9.08%26.51%-4.28%10.86%

Correlation

The correlation between EDM4.DE and DBXI.DE is 0.86, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.86

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.85

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.85

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 17, 2019

0.80

The correlation between EDM4.DE and DBXI.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.80 to 0.86 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EDM4.DE vs. DBXI.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EDM4.DE
EDM4.DE Risk / Return Rank: 3434
Overall Rank
EDM4.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3333
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EDM4.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
EDM4.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 3434
Omega Ratio Rank
EDM4.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 3333
Calmar Ratio Rank
EDM4.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 3838
Martin Ratio Rank

DBXI.DE
DBXI.DE Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
DBXI.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DBXI.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
DBXI.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
DBXI.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
DBXI.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EDM4.DE vs. DBXI.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI EMU ESG Enhanced UCITS ETF EUR Acc (EDM4.DE) and Xtrackers FTSE MIB UCITS ETF (DBXI.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EDM4.DEDBXI.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.78

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.92

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.22

1.34

-0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.61

3.17

-1.55

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.81

11.42

-5.61

EDM4.DE vs. DBXI.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EDM4.DE Sharpe Ratio is 1.17, which is lower than the DBXI.DE Sharpe Ratio of 1.94. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EDM4.DE and DBXI.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EDM4.DEDBXI.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.17

1.94

-0.78

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.60

1.09

-0.49

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.75

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.57

0.19

+0.38

Drawdowns

EDM4.DE vs. DBXI.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EDM4.DE drawdown since its inception was -35.27%, smaller than the maximum DBXI.DE drawdown of -69.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EDM4.DE and DBXI.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EDM4.DEDBXI.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.27%

-69.49%

+34.22%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.78%

-9.62%

-1.16%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.08%

-17.56%

+2.48%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.24%

-25.10%

-0.14%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-40.46%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.39%

-0.77%

+0.38%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.64%

-29.56%

+23.92%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.00%

2.67%

+0.33%

Volatility

EDM4.DE vs. DBXI.DE - Volatility Comparison

iShares MSCI EMU ESG Enhanced UCITS ETF EUR Acc (EDM4.DE) and Xtrackers FTSE MIB UCITS ETF (DBXI.DE) have volatilities of 4.75% and 4.63%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EDM4.DEDBXI.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.75%

4.63%

+0.12%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.28%

12.34%

-0.06%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.93%

15.69%

-0.76%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.32%

18.31%

-1.99%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.07%

20.37%

-2.30%

EDM4.DE vs. DBXI.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

EDM4.DE has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is lower than DBXI.DE's 0.30% expense ratio.


Dividends

EDM4.DE vs. DBXI.DE - Dividend Comparison

EDM4.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while DBXI.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.63%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DBXI.DE
Xtrackers FTSE MIB UCITS ETF
3.63%3.93%4.53%3.78%7.45%0.94%4.23%3.33%2.66%1.94%2.51%0.15%
EDM4.DE
iShares MSCI EMU ESG Enhanced UCITS ETF EUR Acc
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


EDM4.DE and DBXI.DE have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, EDM4.DE is cheaper at 0.12% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

EDM4.DE is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for DBXI.DE.

EDM4.DE tracks MSCI EMU ESG Enhanced Focus, while DBXI.DE tracks FTSE MIB. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Xtrackers. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for EDM4.DE and 0.30% for DBXI.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EDM4.DE and DBXI.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer