PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EDGH vs. USOI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EDGH vs. USOI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in 3EDGE Dynamic Hard Assets ETF (EDGH) and Credit Suisse X-Links Crude Oil Shares Covered Call ETN (USOI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EDGH achieves a 5.36% return, which is significantly lower than USOI's 26.72% return.


EDGH

1D
-1.05%
1M
-7.26%
YTD
5.36%
6M
3.21%
1Y
21.58%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

USOI

1D
-1.16%
1M
-13.97%
YTD
26.72%
6M
25.07%
1Y
24.90%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EDGH vs. USOI - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
EDGH
3EDGE Dynamic Hard Assets ETF
5.36%28.98%-1.97%
USOI
Credit Suisse X-Links Crude Oil Shares Covered Call ETN
26.72%-8.78%5.17%

Correlation

The correlation between EDGH and USOI is 0.22, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.22

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 3, 2024

0.26

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EDGH vs. USOI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EDGH
EDGH Risk / Return Rank: 3838
Overall Rank
EDGH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EDGH Sortino Ratio Rank: 3131
Sortino Ratio Rank
EDGH Omega Ratio Rank: 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
EDGH Calmar Ratio Rank: 4343
Calmar Ratio Rank
EDGH Martin Ratio Rank: 4040
Martin Ratio Rank

USOI
USOI Risk / Return Rank: 3030
Overall Rank
USOI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3131
Sharpe Ratio Rank
USOI Sortino Ratio Rank: 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
USOI Omega Ratio Rank: 2929
Omega Ratio Rank
USOI Calmar Ratio Rank: 2929
Calmar Ratio Rank
USOI Martin Ratio Rank: 3131
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EDGH vs. USOI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for 3EDGE Dynamic Hard Assets ETF (EDGH) and Credit Suisse X-Links Crude Oil Shares Covered Call ETN (USOI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


EDGHUSOIDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.13

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.01

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.19

+0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.00

1.36

+0.64

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.80

4.30

+1.51

EDGH vs. USOI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EDGH Sharpe Ratio is 1.20, which is comparable to the USOI Sharpe Ratio of 1.07. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EDGH and USOI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

EDGH vs. USOI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EDGH drawdown since its inception was -10.83%, smaller than the maximum USOI drawdown of -19.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EDGH and USOI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EDGHUSOIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-10.83%

-19.49%

+8.66%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.83%

-18.41%

+7.58%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-10.83%

-18.41%

+7.58%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.23%

-7.33%

+5.10%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.74%

5.81%

-2.07%

Volatility

EDGH vs. USOI - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for 3EDGE Dynamic Hard Assets ETF (EDGH) is 3.41%, while Credit Suisse X-Links Crude Oil Shares Covered Call ETN (USOI) has a volatility of 9.08%. This indicates that EDGH experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than USOI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EDGHUSOIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.41%

9.08%

-5.67%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.10%

19.23%

-4.13%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.02%

23.55%

-5.53%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.59%

23.00%

-7.41%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.59%

23.00%

-7.41%

EDGH vs. USOI - Expense Ratio Comparison

EDGH has a 1.01% expense ratio, which is higher than USOI's 0.85% expense ratio.


Dividends

EDGH vs. USOI - Dividend Comparison

EDGH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.12%, less than USOI's 47.27% yield.


PositionTTM20252024
EDGH
3EDGE Dynamic Hard Assets ETF
1.12%1.18%3.19%
USOI
Credit Suisse X-Links Crude Oil Shares Covered Call ETN
47.27%27.21%12.54%

Frequently Asked Questions


EDGH and USOI have a correlation of 0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

USOI has higher volatility (9.08%) compared to EDGH (3.41%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EDGH dropped -10.83% vs USOI's -19.49%.

On 1-year performance, USOI leads with 24.90% vs 21.58% for EDGH. On fees, USOI is cheaper at 0.85% per year. On volatility, EDGH has been the lower-risk option at 3.41%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, USOI has performed better with a 24.90% return vs 21.58%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

USOI is cheaper with a 0.85% expense ratio, compared with 1.01% for EDGH.

USOI has the higher dividend yield at 47.27%, compared with 1.12% for EDGH.

EDGH is categorized as Commodities, while USOI is Oil & Gas. They also come from different issuers: 3EDGE Asset Management and Credit Suisse. Their fees differ too: 1.01% for EDGH and 0.85% for USOI.

EDGH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.20 vs 1.07), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EDGH and USOI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer