EDGH vs. SPTU
EDGH (3EDGE Dynamic Hard Assets ETF) and SPTU (State Street SPDR Portfolio Ultra Short T-Bill ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - EDGH is a Commodities fund actively managed by 3EDGE Asset Management, while SPTU is a Ultrashort Bond fund tracking the ICE BofA US Treasury Bill Index. EDGH is actively managed, while SPTU is passively managed. At a correlation of -0.07, they often move in opposite directions. EDGH charges 1.01%/yr vs 0.05%/yr for SPTU.
Performance
EDGH vs. SPTU - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EDGH achieves a 5.36% return, which is significantly higher than SPTU's 1.66% return.
EDGH
- 1D
- -1.05%
- 1M
- -7.26%
- YTD
- 5.36%
- 6M
- 3.21%
- 1Y
- 21.58%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SPTU
- 1D
- 0.03%
- 1M
- 0.29%
- YTD
- 1.66%
- 6M
- 1.74%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
EDGH vs. SPTU - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
EDGH 3EDGE Dynamic Hard Assets ETF | 5.36% | 5.50% |
SPTU State Street SPDR Portfolio Ultra Short T-Bill ETF | 1.66% | 0.87% |
Correlation
The correlation between EDGH and SPTU is -0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 8, 2025 | -0.07 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EDGH vs. SPTU — Risk / Return Rank
EDGH
SPTU
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
EDGH vs. SPTU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for 3EDGE Dynamic Hard Assets ETF (EDGH) and State Street SPDR Portfolio Ultra Short T-Bill ETF (SPTU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| EDGH | SPTU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.25 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.00 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.80 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
EDGH vs. SPTU - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EDGH drawdown since its inception was -10.83%, which is greater than SPTU's maximum drawdown of -0.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EDGH and SPTU.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EDGH | SPTU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -10.83% | -0.04% | -10.79% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.83% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -10.83% | 0.00% | -10.83% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.23% | -0.00% | -2.23% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.74% | — | — |
Volatility
EDGH vs. SPTU - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EDGH | SPTU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.41% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.10% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.02% | 0.33% | +17.69% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.59% | 0.33% | +15.26% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.59% | 0.33% | +15.26% |
EDGH vs. SPTU - Expense Ratio Comparison
EDGH has a 1.01% expense ratio, which is higher than SPTU's 0.05% expense ratio.
Dividends
EDGH vs. SPTU - Dividend Comparison
EDGH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.12%, less than SPTU's 2.36% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
EDGH 3EDGE Dynamic Hard Assets ETF | 1.12% | 1.18% | 3.19% |
SPTU State Street SPDR Portfolio Ultra Short T-Bill ETF | 2.36% | 0.89% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EDGH and SPTU have a correlation of -0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SPTU is cheaper at 0.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SPTU is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 1.01% for EDGH.
SPTU has the higher dividend yield at 2.36%, compared with 1.12% for EDGH.
EDGH is categorized as Commodities, while SPTU is Ultrashort Bond. They also come from different issuers: 3EDGE Asset Management and State Street. Their fees differ too: 1.01% for EDGH and 0.05% for SPTU.
Find the right allocation for EDGH and SPTU
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer