EDGH vs. EVMO
EDGH (3EDGE Dynamic Hard Assets ETF) and EVMO (Eaton Vance Mortgage Opportunities ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - EDGH is a Commodities fund actively managed by 3EDGE Asset Management, while EVMO is a Mortgage Backed Securities fund actively managed by Eaton Vance. Both are actively managed. At a 0.03 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. EDGH charges 1.01%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for EVMO.
Performance
EDGH vs. EVMO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EDGH achieves a 12.49% return, which is significantly higher than EVMO's 0.73% return.
EDGH
- 1D
- -0.45%
- 1M
- -1.84%
- YTD
- 12.49%
- 6M
- 14.30%
- 1Y
- 31.24%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
EVMO
- 1D
- -0.25%
- 1M
- 0.14%
- YTD
- 0.73%
- 6M
- 0.92%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
EDGH vs. EVMO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
EDGH 3EDGE Dynamic Hard Assets ETF | 12.49% | 16.17% |
EVMO Eaton Vance Mortgage Opportunities ETF | 0.73% | 3.33% |
Correlation
The correlation between EDGH and EVMO is 0.03, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 5, 2025 | 0.03 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EDGH vs. EVMO — Risk / Return Rank
EDGH
EVMO
EDGH vs. EVMO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for 3EDGE Dynamic Hard Assets ETF (EDGH) and Eaton Vance Mortgage Opportunities ETF (EVMO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EDGH | EVMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.77 | — | — |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.15 | — | — |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.36 | — | — |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.96 | — | — |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.70 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EDGH | EVMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.77 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.53 | 1.76 | -0.23 |
Drawdowns
EDGH vs. EVMO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EDGH drawdown since its inception was -10.60%, which is greater than EVMO's maximum drawdown of -1.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EDGH and EVMO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EDGH | EVMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -10.60% | -1.89% | -8.71% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.60% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.80% | -0.91% | -3.89% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.04% | -0.38% | -1.66% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.23% | — | — |
Volatility
EDGH vs. EVMO - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EDGH | EVMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.01% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.72% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.72% | 2.83% | +14.89% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.60% | 2.83% | +12.77% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.60% | 2.83% | +12.77% |
EDGH vs. EVMO - Expense Ratio Comparison
EDGH has a 1.01% expense ratio, which is higher than EVMO's 0.45% expense ratio.
Dividends
EDGH vs. EVMO - Dividend Comparison
EDGH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.05%, less than EVMO's 4.07% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
EDGH 3EDGE Dynamic Hard Assets ETF | 1.05% | 1.18% | 3.19% |
EVMO Eaton Vance Mortgage Opportunities ETF | 4.07% | 1.95% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EDGH and EVMO have a correlation of 0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, EVMO is cheaper at 0.45% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
EVMO is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 1.01% for EDGH.
EVMO has the higher dividend yield at 4.07%, compared with 1.05% for EDGH.
EDGH is categorized as Commodities, while EVMO is Mortgage Backed Securities. They also come from different issuers: 3EDGE Asset Management and Eaton Vance. Their fees differ too: 1.01% for EDGH and 0.45% for EVMO.
Find the right allocation for EDGH and EVMO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer