PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EDGH vs. ADBG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EDGH vs. ADBG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in 3EDGE Dynamic Hard Assets ETF (EDGH) and Leverage Shares 2X Long ADBE Daily ETF (ADBG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EDGH achieves a 12.49% return, which is significantly higher than ADBG's -52.94% return.


EDGH

1D
-0.45%
1M
-1.84%
YTD
12.49%
6M
14.30%
1Y
31.24%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

ADBG

1D
-4.56%
1M
-1.43%
YTD
-52.94%
6M
-46.73%
1Y
-70.05%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EDGH vs. ADBG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
EDGH
3EDGE Dynamic Hard Assets ETF
12.49%19.75%
ADBG
Leverage Shares 2X Long ADBE Daily ETF
-52.94%-30.89%

Correlation

The correlation between EDGH and ADBG is -0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.09

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 24, 2025

-0.09

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EDGH vs. ADBG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EDGH
EDGH Risk / Return Rank: 5454
Overall Rank
EDGH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EDGH Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
EDGH Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
EDGH Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
EDGH Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank

ADBG
ADBG Risk / Return Rank: 11
Overall Rank
ADBG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 11
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ADBG Sortino Ratio Rank: 11
Sortino Ratio Rank
ADBG Omega Ratio Rank: 11
Omega Ratio Rank
ADBG Calmar Ratio Rank: 11
Calmar Ratio Rank
ADBG Martin Ratio Rank: 22
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EDGH vs. ADBG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for 3EDGE Dynamic Hard Assets ETF (EDGH) and Leverage Shares 2X Long ADBE Daily ETF (ADBG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EDGHADBGDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.77

-1.05

+2.82

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.15

-1.88

+4.03

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

0.78

+0.59

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.96

-0.92

+3.88

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

9.70

-1.40

+11.10

EDGH vs. ADBG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EDGH Sharpe Ratio is 1.77, which is higher than the ADBG Sharpe Ratio of -1.05. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EDGH and ADBG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EDGHADBGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.77

-1.05

+2.82

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.53

-0.91

+2.44

Drawdowns

EDGH vs. ADBG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EDGH drawdown since its inception was -10.60%, smaller than the maximum ADBG drawdown of -76.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EDGH and ADBG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EDGHADBGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-10.60%

-76.71%

+66.11%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.60%

-76.23%

+65.63%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.80%

-71.42%

+66.62%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.04%

-41.64%

+39.60%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.23%

50.12%

-46.89%

Volatility

EDGH vs. ADBG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for 3EDGE Dynamic Hard Assets ETF (EDGH) is 3.01%, while Leverage Shares 2X Long ADBE Daily ETF (ADBG) has a volatility of 27.71%. This indicates that EDGH experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ADBG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EDGHADBGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.01%

27.71%

-24.70%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.72%

56.21%

-41.49%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.72%

67.26%

-49.54%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.60%

66.94%

-51.34%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.60%

66.94%

-51.34%

EDGH vs. ADBG - Expense Ratio Comparison

EDGH has a 1.01% expense ratio, which is higher than ADBG's 0.75% expense ratio.


Dividends

EDGH vs. ADBG - Dividend Comparison

EDGH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.05%, while ADBG has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024
ADBG
Leverage Shares 2X Long ADBE Daily ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%
EDGH
3EDGE Dynamic Hard Assets ETF
1.05%1.18%3.19%

Frequently Asked Questions


EDGH and ADBG have a correlation of -0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ADBG has higher volatility (27.71%) compared to EDGH (3.01%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EDGH dropped -10.60% vs ADBG's -76.71%.

On 1-year performance, EDGH leads with 31.24% vs -70.05% for ADBG. On fees, ADBG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. On volatility, EDGH has been the lower-risk option at 3.01%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, EDGH has performed better with a 31.24% return vs -70.05%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

ADBG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.01% for EDGH.

EDGH has the higher dividend yield at 1.05%, compared with 0.00% for ADBG.

EDGH is categorized as Commodities, while ADBG is Leveraged Equities. They also come from different issuers: 3EDGE Asset Management and Leverage Shares. Their fees differ too: 1.01% for EDGH and 0.75% for ADBG.

EDGH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.77 vs -1.05), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EDGH and ADBG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer