PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EDGE vs. PEPS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EDGE vs. PEPS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in MRBL Enhanced Equity ETF (EDGE) and Parametric Equity Plus ETF (PEPS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EDGE achieves a 9.19% return, which is significantly lower than PEPS's 10.67% return.


EDGE

1D
-0.24%
1M
3.49%
YTD
9.19%
6M
10.97%
1Y
28.99%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

PEPS

1D
-0.51%
1M
6.44%
YTD
10.67%
6M
10.79%
1Y
31.83%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EDGE vs. PEPS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
EDGE
MRBL Enhanced Equity ETF
9.19%13.16%
PEPS
Parametric Equity Plus ETF
10.67%16.11%

Correlation

The correlation between EDGE and PEPS is 0.97 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.97

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 23, 2025

0.95

The correlation between EDGE and PEPS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.95 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EDGE vs. PEPS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EDGE
EDGE Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
EDGE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EDGE Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
EDGE Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
EDGE Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
EDGE Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank

PEPS
PEPS Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
PEPS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PEPS Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
PEPS Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
PEPS Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
PEPS Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EDGE vs. PEPS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MRBL Enhanced Equity ETF (EDGE) and Parametric Equity Plus ETF (PEPS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EDGEPEPSDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.13

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.32

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.53

1.45

+0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.23

3.26

-0.03

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

17.20

15.28

+1.92

EDGE vs. PEPS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EDGE Sharpe Ratio is 2.58, which is comparable to the PEPS Sharpe Ratio of 2.45. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EDGE and PEPS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EDGEPEPSDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.58

2.45

+0.13

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.06

1.05

+0.01

Drawdowns

EDGE vs. PEPS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EDGE drawdown since its inception was -20.66%, roughly equal to the maximum PEPS drawdown of -21.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EDGE and PEPS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EDGEPEPSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-20.66%

-21.26%

+0.60%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.01%

-9.80%

+0.79%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.24%

-0.51%

+0.27%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.85%

-2.77%

-0.08%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.69%

2.09%

-0.40%

Volatility

EDGE vs. PEPS - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for MRBL Enhanced Equity ETF (EDGE) is 1.80%, while Parametric Equity Plus ETF (PEPS) has a volatility of 2.77%. This indicates that EDGE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PEPS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EDGEPEPSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.80%

2.77%

-0.97%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.08%

9.83%

-0.75%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.28%

13.06%

-1.78%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.95%

18.31%

-2.36%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.95%

18.31%

-2.36%

EDGE vs. PEPS - Expense Ratio Comparison

EDGE has a 0.74% expense ratio, which is higher than PEPS's 0.10% expense ratio.


Dividends

EDGE vs. PEPS - Dividend Comparison

EDGE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while PEPS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.88%.


PositionTTM20252024
EDGE
MRBL Enhanced Equity ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%
PEPS
Parametric Equity Plus ETF
0.88%1.00%0.17%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.97, EDGE and PEPS move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

PEPS has higher volatility (2.77%) compared to EDGE (1.80%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EDGE dropped -20.66% vs PEPS's -21.26%.

On 1-year performance, PEPS leads with 31.83% vs 28.99% for EDGE. On fees, PEPS is cheaper at 0.10% per year. On volatility, EDGE has been the lower-risk option at 1.80%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, PEPS has performed better with a 31.83% return vs 28.99%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

PEPS is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.74% for EDGE.

PEPS has the higher dividend yield at 0.88%, compared with 0.00% for EDGE.

They also come from different issuers: MRBL and Parametric. Their fees differ too: 0.74% for EDGE and 0.10% for PEPS.

EDGE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.58 vs 2.45), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EDGE and PEPS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer