EDG2.L vs. PAJS.L
EDG2.L (iShares MSCI EM ESG Enhanced UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) and PAJS.L (Invesco MSCI Japan ESG Climate Paris Aligned UCITS ETF Acc) are both exchange-traded funds - EDG2.L is a Emerging Markets Equities fund tracking the MSCI EM NR USD, while PAJS.L is a Japan Equities fund tracking the TOPIX TR JPY. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, EDG2.L returned 20.29%/yr vs 6.52%/yr for PAJS.L. At a 0.48 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. EDG2.L charges 0.18%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for PAJS.L.
Performance
EDG2.L vs. PAJS.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
EDG2.L is traded in GBP, while PAJS.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the PAJS.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EDG2.L achieves a 25.10% return, which is significantly higher than PAJS.L's 7.24% return.
EDG2.L
- 1D
- -1.36%
- 1M
- 6.61%
- YTD
- 25.10%
- 6M
- 26.84%
- 1Y
- 51.62%
- 3Y*
- 20.29%
- 5Y*
- 7.75%
- 10Y*
- —
PAJS.L
- 1D
- -0.95%
- 1M
- 3.55%
- YTD
- 7.24%
- 6M
- 5.00%
- 1Y
- 19.35%
- 3Y*
- 6.52%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
EDG2.L vs. PAJS.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EDG2.L iShares MSCI EM ESG Enhanced UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 25.10% | 26.14% | 8.61% | 2.17% | -12.40% | -3.09% |
PAJS.L Invesco MSCI Japan ESG Climate Paris Aligned UCITS ETF Acc | 7.24% | 13.24% | 0.76% | 8.67% | -14.19% | -3.23% |
Correlation
The correlation between EDG2.L and PAJS.L is 0.52, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.52 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.46 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 10, 2021 | 0.48 |
The correlation between EDG2.L and PAJS.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.46 to 0.52 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EDG2.L vs. PAJS.L — Risk / Return Rank
EDG2.L
PAJS.L
EDG2.L vs. PAJS.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI EM ESG Enhanced UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (EDG2.L) and Invesco MSCI Japan ESG Climate Paris Aligned UCITS ETF Acc (PAJS.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EDG2.L | PAJS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.93 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.22 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.56 | 1.20 | +0.35 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.54 | 1.62 | +2.92 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 15.95 | 5.02 | +10.93 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EDG2.L | PAJS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.00 | 1.07 | +1.93 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.48 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.52 | 0.10 | +0.42 |
Drawdowns
EDG2.L vs. PAJS.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EDG2.L drawdown since its inception was -28.22%, smaller than the maximum PAJS.L drawdown of -29.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EDG2.L and PAJS.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EDG2.L | PAJS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -28.22% | -29.71% | +1.49% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.31% | -11.92% | +0.61% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.35% | -29.71% | +14.36% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.03% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.52% | -7.43% | +4.91% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.12% | -16.45% | +4.33% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.23% | 3.84% | -0.61% |
Volatility
EDG2.L vs. PAJS.L - Volatility Comparison
iShares MSCI EM ESG Enhanced UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (EDG2.L) has a higher volatility of 7.51% compared to Invesco MSCI Japan ESG Climate Paris Aligned UCITS ETF Acc (PAJS.L) at 4.40%. This indicates that EDG2.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PAJS.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EDG2.L | PAJS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.51% | 4.40% | +3.11% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.69% | 14.33% | +0.36% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.13% | 18.01% | -0.88% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.14% | 22.26% | -6.12% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.91% | 22.26% | -4.35% |
EDG2.L vs. PAJS.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
EDG2.L has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is lower than PAJS.L's 0.19% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
EDG2.L vs. PAJS.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither EDG2.L nor PAJS.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
EDG2.L and PAJS.L have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, EDG2.L is cheaper at 0.18% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
EDG2.L is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.19% for PAJS.L.
EDG2.L is categorized as Emerging Markets Equities, while PAJS.L is Japan Equities. EDG2.L tracks MSCI EM NR USD, while PAJS.L tracks TOPIX TR JPY. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for EDG2.L and 0.19% for PAJS.L.
Find the right allocation for EDG2.L and PAJS.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer