EDG2.L vs. IITU.L
EDG2.L (iShares MSCI EM ESG Enhanced UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) and IITU.L (iShares S&P 500 Information Technology Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) are both exchange-traded funds - EDG2.L is a Emerging Markets Equities fund tracking the MSCI EM NR USD, while IITU.L is a Technology Equities fund tracking the S&P 500 Capped 35/20 Information Technology Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, EDG2.L returned 7.75%/yr vs 25.50%/yr for IITU.L. A 0.56 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. EDG2.L charges 0.18%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for IITU.L.
Performance
EDG2.L vs. IITU.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
EDG2.L is traded in GBP, while IITU.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the IITU.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EDG2.L achieves a 25.10% return, which is significantly higher than IITU.L's 23.25% return.
EDG2.L
- 1D
- -1.36%
- 1M
- 6.61%
- YTD
- 25.10%
- 6M
- 26.84%
- 1Y
- 51.62%
- 3Y*
- 20.29%
- 5Y*
- 7.75%
- 10Y*
- —
IITU.L
- 1D
- -2.08%
- 1M
- 14.24%
- YTD
- 23.25%
- 6M
- 22.00%
- 1Y
- 53.38%
- 3Y*
- 30.94%
- 5Y*
- 25.50%
- 10Y*
- 27.26%
EDG2.L vs. IITU.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EDG2.L iShares MSCI EM ESG Enhanced UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 25.10% | 26.14% | 8.61% | 2.17% | -12.40% | -1.62% | 15.80% | 2.32% |
IITU.L iShares S&P 500 Information Technology Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 23.25% | 14.44% | 40.85% | 50.70% | -20.63% | 35.67% | 38.34% | 2.99% |
Correlation
The correlation between EDG2.L and IITU.L is 0.64, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.64 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.53 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.53 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 25, 2019 | 0.56 |
The correlation between EDG2.L and IITU.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.53 (5 years) to 0.64 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
EDG2.L vs. IITU.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
EDG2.L
IITU.L
Technology
Financial Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Industrials
Communication Services
-
Basic Materials
-
Energy
Consumer Defensive
-
Healthcare
-
Utilities
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
EDG2.L
IITU.L
Financial Services
EDG2.L
IITU.L
-
Consumer Cyclical
EDG2.L
IITU.L
-
Industrials
EDG2.L
IITU.L
Communication Services
EDG2.L
IITU.L
-
Basic Materials
EDG2.L
IITU.L
-
Energy
EDG2.L
IITU.L
Consumer Defensive
EDG2.L
IITU.L
-
Healthcare
EDG2.L
IITU.L
-
Utilities
EDG2.L
IITU.L
-
Real Estate
EDG2.L
IITU.L
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EDG2.L vs. IITU.L — Risk / Return Rank
EDG2.L
IITU.L
EDG2.L vs. IITU.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI EM ESG Enhanced UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (EDG2.L) and iShares S&P 500 Information Technology Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IITU.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EDG2.L | IITU.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.29 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.42 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.56 | 1.44 | +0.11 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.54 | 3.17 | +1.37 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 15.95 | 8.17 | +7.78 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EDG2.L | IITU.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.00 | 2.71 | +0.29 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.48 | 1.16 | -0.68 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 1.28 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.52 | 1.23 | -0.71 |
Drawdowns
EDG2.L vs. IITU.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EDG2.L drawdown since its inception was -28.22%, roughly equal to the maximum IITU.L drawdown of -28.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EDG2.L and IITU.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EDG2.L | IITU.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -28.22% | -28.03% | -0.19% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.31% | -16.76% | +5.45% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.35% | -28.03% | +12.68% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.03% | -28.03% | +3.00% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -28.03% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.52% | -2.89% | +0.37% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.12% | -5.14% | -6.98% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.23% | 6.51% | -3.28% |
Volatility
EDG2.L vs. IITU.L - Volatility Comparison
iShares MSCI EM ESG Enhanced UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (EDG2.L) has a higher volatility of 7.51% compared to iShares S&P 500 Information Technology Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IITU.L) at 7.01%. This indicates that EDG2.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IITU.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EDG2.L | IITU.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.51% | 7.01% | +0.50% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.69% | 14.45% | +0.24% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.13% | 19.60% | -2.47% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.14% | 21.94% | -5.80% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.91% | 21.31% | -3.40% |
EDG2.L vs. IITU.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
EDG2.L has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is higher than IITU.L's 0.15% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
EDG2.L vs. IITU.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither EDG2.L nor IITU.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
EDG2.L and IITU.L have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, IITU.L is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
IITU.L is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.18% for EDG2.L.
EDG2.L is categorized as Emerging Markets Equities, while IITU.L is Technology Equities. EDG2.L tracks MSCI EM NR USD, while IITU.L tracks S&P 500 Capped 35/20 Information Technology Index. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for EDG2.L and 0.15% for IITU.L.
Find the right allocation for EDG2.L and IITU.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer