PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EDG2.L vs. EEUD.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EDG2.L vs. EEUD.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in iShares MSCI EM ESG Enhanced UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (EDG2.L) and iShares MSCI Europe ESG Enhanced UCITS ETF EUR (Dist) (EEUD.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EDG2.L achieves a 25.10% return, which is significantly higher than EEUD.L's 6.81% return.


EDG2.L

1D
-1.36%
1M
6.61%
YTD
25.10%
6M
26.84%
1Y
51.62%
3Y*
20.29%
5Y*
7.75%
10Y*

EEUD.L

1D
0.66%
1M
3.78%
YTD
6.81%
6M
9.10%
1Y
18.95%
3Y*
12.96%
5Y*
8.83%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EDG2.L vs. EEUD.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
EDG2.L
iShares MSCI EM ESG Enhanced UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
25.10%26.14%8.61%2.17%-12.40%-1.62%15.80%2.32%
EEUD.L
iShares MSCI Europe ESG Enhanced UCITS ETF EUR (Dist)
6.81%23.28%3.38%13.27%-6.77%17.17%4.21%1.94%

Correlation

The correlation between EDG2.L and EEUD.L is 0.56, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.56

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.57

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.56

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 25, 2019

0.61

The correlation between EDG2.L and EEUD.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.56 to 0.61 - a consistent structural relationship.

EDG2.L vs. EEUD.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
EDG2.L
EEUD.L

Technology

43.1%
9.3%

Financial Services

17.9%
24.5%

Consumer Cyclical

8.6%
6.9%

Industrials

7.0%
19.0%

Communication Services

6.3%
3.7%

Basic Materials

5.5%
4.1%

Energy

3.4%
4.5%

Consumer Defensive

2.7%
7.9%

Healthcare

2.6%
13.7%

Utilities

1.7%
5.1%

Real Estate

1.3%
1.4%

Technology

EDG2.L
43.1%
EEUD.L
9.3%

Financial Services

EDG2.L
17.9%
EEUD.L
24.5%

Consumer Cyclical

EDG2.L
8.6%
EEUD.L
6.9%

Industrials

EDG2.L
7.0%
EEUD.L
19.0%

Communication Services

EDG2.L
6.3%
EEUD.L
3.7%

Basic Materials

EDG2.L
5.5%
EEUD.L
4.1%

Energy

EDG2.L
3.4%
EEUD.L
4.5%

Consumer Defensive

EDG2.L
2.7%
EEUD.L
7.9%

Healthcare

EDG2.L
2.6%
EEUD.L
13.7%

Utilities

EDG2.L
1.7%
EEUD.L
5.1%

Real Estate

EDG2.L
1.3%
EEUD.L
1.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EDG2.L vs. EEUD.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EDG2.L
EDG2.L Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
EDG2.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EDG2.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
EDG2.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
EDG2.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
EDG2.L Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank

EEUD.L
EEUD.L Risk / Return Rank: 4141
Overall Rank
EEUD.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4343
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EEUD.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
EEUD.L Omega Ratio Rank: 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
EEUD.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 3535
Calmar Ratio Rank
EEUD.L Martin Ratio Rank: 3838
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EDG2.L vs. EEUD.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI EM ESG Enhanced UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (EDG2.L) and iShares MSCI Europe ESG Enhanced UCITS ETF EUR (Dist) (EEUD.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EDG2.LEEUD.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.50

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.75

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.56

1.28

+0.27

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.54

1.70

+2.84

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.95

5.82

+10.13

EDG2.L vs. EEUD.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EDG2.L Sharpe Ratio is 3.00, which is higher than the EEUD.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.50. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EDG2.L and EEUD.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EDG2.LEEUD.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.00

1.50

+1.50

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.48

0.63

-0.15

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.52

0.63

-0.11

Drawdowns

EDG2.L vs. EEUD.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EDG2.L drawdown since its inception was -28.22%, roughly equal to the maximum EEUD.L drawdown of -27.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EDG2.L and EEUD.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EDG2.LEEUD.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-28.22%

-27.37%

-0.85%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.31%

-11.10%

-0.21%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.35%

-12.69%

-2.66%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.03%

-18.30%

-6.73%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.52%

-1.81%

-0.71%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.12%

-4.06%

-8.06%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.23%

3.25%

-0.02%

Volatility

EDG2.L vs. EEUD.L - Volatility Comparison

iShares MSCI EM ESG Enhanced UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (EDG2.L) has a higher volatility of 7.51% compared to iShares MSCI Europe ESG Enhanced UCITS ETF EUR (Dist) (EEUD.L) at 4.15%. This indicates that EDG2.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EEUD.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EDG2.LEEUD.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.51%

4.15%

+3.36%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.69%

10.48%

+4.21%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.13%

12.59%

+4.54%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.14%

13.95%

+2.19%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.91%

15.65%

+2.26%

EDG2.L vs. EEUD.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

EDG2.L has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is higher than EEUD.L's 0.12% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

EDG2.L vs. EEUD.L - Dividend Comparison

EDG2.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while EEUD.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.38%.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019
EDG2.L
iShares MSCI EM ESG Enhanced UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
EEUD.L
iShares MSCI Europe ESG Enhanced UCITS ETF EUR (Dist)
2.38%2.54%2.94%2.76%2.92%2.30%1.92%2.72%

Frequently Asked Questions


EDG2.L and EEUD.L have a correlation of 0.56, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, EEUD.L is cheaper at 0.12% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

EEUD.L is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.18% for EDG2.L.

EDG2.L is categorized as Emerging Markets Equities, while EEUD.L is Europe Equities. EDG2.L tracks MSCI EM NR USD, while EEUD.L tracks MSCI Europe NR EUR. They also come from different issuers: iShares and BlackRock. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for EDG2.L and 0.12% for EEUD.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EDG2.L and EEUD.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer