PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
EDG2.L vs. CNDX.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

EDG2.L vs. CNDX.L

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about iShares MSCI EM ESG Enhanced UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (EDG2.L) and iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF (CNDX.L).

EDG2.L and CNDX.L are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. EDG2.L is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the MSCI EM NR USD. It was launched on Oct 22, 2019. CNDX.L is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the NASDAQ-100 Index. It was launched on Jan 26, 2010. Both EDG2.L and CNDX.L are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.

Performance

EDG2.L vs. CNDX.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in iShares MSCI EM ESG Enhanced UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (EDG2.L) and iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF (CNDX.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

EDG2.L vs. CNDX.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
EDG2.L
iShares MSCI EM ESG Enhanced UCITS ETF USD (Acc)		5.26%26.14%8.61%2.17%-12.40%-1.62%15.80%2.32%
CNDX.L
iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF		-3.56%11.22%28.66%48.50%-25.54%29.17%43.97%2.23%
Different Trading Currencies

EDG2.L is traded in GBP, while CNDX.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the CNDX.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EDG2.L achieves a 5.26% return, which is significantly higher than CNDX.L's -6.43% return.

EDG2.L

1D
3.19%
1M
-5.77%
YTD
5.26%
6M
8.59%
1Y
30.88%
3Y*
13.35%
5Y*
4.41%
10Y*
—

CNDX.L

1D
0.00%
1M
-4.81%
YTD
-6.43%
6M
-3.55%
1Y
17.90%
3Y*
18.93%
5Y*
13.34%
10Y*
19.39%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

iShares MSCI EM ESG Enhanced UCITS ETF USD (Acc)

iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF

Often compared with EDG2.L:
EDG2.L vs. EMIM.LEDG2.L vs. ENPHEDG2.L vs. VERX.LEDG2.L vs. CSPX.LEDG2.L vs. SEDY.LEDG2.L vs. IWDA.LEDG2.L vs. EIMI.L
Often compared with CNDX.L:
CNDX.L vs. QQQCNDX.L vs. EQQQ.DECNDX.L vs. CNX1.LCNDX.L vs. SXRV.DECNDX.L vs. CSPX.LCNDX.L vs. EQQU.LCNDX.L vs. CNDX.AS

EDG2.L vs. CNDX.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

EDG2.L has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is lower than CNDX.L's 0.33% expense ratio.

CNDX.L
iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF
EDG2.L
iShares MSCI EM ESG Enhanced UCITS ETF USD (Acc)

Return for Risk

EDG2.L vs. CNDX.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
EDG2.L
EDG2.L Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
EDG2.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EDG2.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
EDG2.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
EDG2.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
EDG2.L Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank
CNDX.L
CNDX.L Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
CNDX.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CNDX.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
CNDX.L Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
CNDX.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
CNDX.L Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EDG2.L vs. CNDX.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI EM ESG Enhanced UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (EDG2.L) and iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF (CNDX.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

EDG2.LCNDX.LDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.84

0.92

+0.92

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.38

1.38

+0.99

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

1.19

+0.16

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.77

2.54

+0.24

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

9.82

7.35

+2.47

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

EDG2.L vs. CNDX.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EDG2.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.84, which is higher than the CNDX.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.92. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EDG2.L and CNDX.L, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

EDG2.LCNDX.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.84

0.92

+0.92

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.28

0.66

-0.38

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

—

0.96

—

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.37

1.08

-0.70

Correlation

The correlation between EDG2.L and CNDX.L is 0.57, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

EDG2.L vs. CNDX.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither EDG2.L nor CNDX.L has paid dividends to shareholders.

TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EDG2.L
iShares MSCI EM ESG Enhanced UCITS ETF USD (Acc)		0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
CNDX.L
iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF		0.00%0.00%0.02%0.05%0.06%0.03%0.04%0.07%0.06%0.30%0.16%0.16%

Drawdowns

EDG2.L vs. CNDX.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EDG2.L drawdown since its inception was -28.22%, roughly equal to the maximum CNDX.L drawdown of -27.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EDG2.L and CNDX.L.

Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators

EDG2.LCNDX.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-28.22%

-35.17%

+6.95%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.31%

-12.06%

+0.75%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.03%

-35.17%

+10.14%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

—

-35.17%

—

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.94%

-7.55%

-0.39%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.39%

-5.35%

-7.04%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.19%

2.95%

+0.24%

Volatility

EDG2.L vs. CNDX.L - Volatility Comparison

iShares MSCI EM ESG Enhanced UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (EDG2.L) has a higher volatility of 7.31% compared to iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF (CNDX.L) at 5.04%. This indicates that EDG2.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CNDX.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period

EDG2.LCNDX.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.31%

5.04%

+2.27%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.75%

11.74%

+1.01%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.71%

19.25%

-2.54%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.73%

20.06%

-4.33%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.70%

20.17%

-2.47%