PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EDF vs. XDTE
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

EDF vs. XDTE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Virtus Stone Harbor Emerging Markets Income Fund (EDF) and Roundhill S&P 500 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF (XDTE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

EDF vs. XDTE - Yearly Performance Comparison


Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EDF achieves a 2.58% return, which is significantly higher than XDTE's -2.43% return.


EDF

1D
2.93%
1M
-0.94%
YTD
2.58%
6M
4.70%
1Y
14.34%
3Y*
18.86%
5Y*
2.85%
10Y*
5.06%

XDTE

1D
1.03%
1M
-4.05%
YTD
-2.43%
6M
0.99%
1Y
13.86%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


EDF vs. XDTE - Expense Ratio Comparison

EDF has a 1.45% expense ratio, which is higher than XDTE's 0.97% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

EDF vs. XDTE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EDF
EDF Risk / Return Rank: 2828
Overall Rank
EDF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3131
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EDF Sortino Ratio Rank: 2626
Sortino Ratio Rank
EDF Omega Ratio Rank: 2727
Omega Ratio Rank
EDF Calmar Ratio Rank: 2525
Calmar Ratio Rank
EDF Martin Ratio Rank: 3232
Martin Ratio Rank

XDTE
XDTE Risk / Return Rank: 4545
Overall Rank
XDTE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XDTE Sortino Ratio Rank: 4141
Sortino Ratio Rank
XDTE Omega Ratio Rank: 4848
Omega Ratio Rank
XDTE Calmar Ratio Rank: 4141
Calmar Ratio Rank
XDTE Martin Ratio Rank: 4646
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EDF vs. XDTE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Virtus Stone Harbor Emerging Markets Income Fund (EDF) and Roundhill S&P 500 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF (XDTE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EDFXDTEDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.80

0.90

-0.11

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.11

1.21

-0.10

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.16

1.19

-0.03

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.88

1.12

-0.25

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

3.89

4.60

-0.71

EDF vs. XDTE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EDF Sharpe Ratio is 0.80, which is comparable to the XDTE Sharpe Ratio of 0.90. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EDF and XDTE, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EDFXDTEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.80

0.90

-0.11

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.11

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.17

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.10

0.90

-0.80

Correlation

The correlation between EDF and XDTE is 0.26, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

EDF vs. XDTE - Dividend Comparison

EDF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 14.63%, less than XDTE's 38.73% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EDF
Virtus Stone Harbor Emerging Markets Income Fund
14.63%14.49%15.32%16.71%17.31%12.91%16.46%15.67%19.37%13.58%14.75%17.93%
XDTE
Roundhill S&P 500 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF
38.73%39.16%20.35%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

EDF vs. XDTE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EDF drawdown since its inception was -64.23%, which is greater than XDTE's maximum drawdown of -19.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EDF and XDTE.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


EDFXDTEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-64.23%

-19.09%

-45.14%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.91%

-12.87%

-1.04%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-53.09%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-64.23%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-15.87%

-4.87%

-11.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-21.61%

-2.44%

-19.17%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.20%

3.14%

+0.06%

Volatility

EDF vs. XDTE - Volatility Comparison

Virtus Stone Harbor Emerging Markets Income Fund (EDF) has a higher volatility of 6.38% compared to Roundhill S&P 500 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF (XDTE) at 4.77%. This indicates that EDF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XDTE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


EDFXDTEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.38%

4.77%

+1.61%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.45%

8.90%

+1.55%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.19%

15.42%

+2.77%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

25.88%

14.07%

+11.81%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

30.66%

14.07%

+16.59%