PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EDF vs. VIMCX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EDF vs. VIMCX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Virtus Stone Harbor Emerging Markets Income Fund (EDF) and Virtus KAR Mid-Cap Core Fund (VIMCX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EDF achieves a 15.01% return, which is significantly higher than VIMCX's -1.29% return. Over the past 10 years, EDF has underperformed VIMCX with an annualized return of 5.00%, while VIMCX has yielded a comparatively higher 10.41% annualized return.


EDF

1D
-0.19%
1M
4.63%
YTD
15.01%
6M
17.87%
1Y
26.01%
3Y*
27.72%
5Y*
5.23%
10Y*
5.00%

VIMCX

1D
-0.61%
1M
-2.81%
YTD
-1.29%
6M
-0.19%
1Y
-0.96%
3Y*
6.61%
5Y*
2.43%
10Y*
10.41%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EDF vs. VIMCX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
EDF
Virtus Stone Harbor Emerging Markets Income Fund
15.01%22.24%25.54%21.63%-27.96%-8.47%-31.14%45.06%-18.24%24.22%
VIMCX
Virtus KAR Mid-Cap Core Fund
-1.29%0.72%5.20%22.64%-19.75%25.28%26.11%31.74%-4.18%24.95%

Correlation

The correlation between EDF and VIMCX is 0.15, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.15

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.24

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.30

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.33

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 28, 2010

0.32

The correlation between EDF and VIMCX shifts across timeframes, from 0.15 (1 year) to 0.33 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EDF vs. VIMCX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EDF
EDF Risk / Return Rank: 4343
Overall Rank
EDF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3838
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EDF Sortino Ratio Rank: 4040
Sortino Ratio Rank
EDF Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
EDF Calmar Ratio Rank: 5050
Calmar Ratio Rank
EDF Martin Ratio Rank: 5050
Martin Ratio Rank

VIMCX
VIMCX Risk / Return Rank: 22
Overall Rank
VIMCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VIMCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
Sortino Ratio Rank
VIMCX Omega Ratio Rank: 22
Omega Ratio Rank
VIMCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
Calmar Ratio Rank
VIMCX Martin Ratio Rank: 22
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EDF vs. VIMCX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Virtus Stone Harbor Emerging Markets Income Fund (EDF) and Virtus KAR Mid-Cap Core Fund (VIMCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EDFVIMCXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.82

-0.08

+1.90

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.67

-0.01

+2.68

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

1.00

+0.32

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.73

-0.18

+2.91

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

10.46

-0.48

+10.93

EDF vs. VIMCX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EDF Sharpe Ratio is 1.82, which is higher than the VIMCX Sharpe Ratio of -0.08. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EDF and VIMCX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EDFVIMCXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.82

-0.08

+1.90

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.20

0.14

+0.07

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.16

0.56

-0.40

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.13

0.71

-0.58

Drawdowns

EDF vs. VIMCX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EDF drawdown since its inception was -64.23%, which is greater than VIMCX's maximum drawdown of -33.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EDF and VIMCX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EDFVIMCXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-64.23%

-33.92%

-30.31%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.44%

-12.14%

+2.70%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.32%

-20.32%

-4.00%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-52.53%

-28.42%

-24.11%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-64.23%

-33.92%

-30.31%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.67%

-7.73%

+2.06%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-21.48%

-4.88%

-16.60%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.46%

4.53%

-2.07%

Volatility

EDF vs. VIMCX - Volatility Comparison

Virtus Stone Harbor Emerging Markets Income Fund (EDF) has a higher volatility of 4.92% compared to Virtus KAR Mid-Cap Core Fund (VIMCX) at 4.23%. This indicates that EDF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VIMCX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EDFVIMCXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.92%

4.23%

+0.69%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.47%

12.04%

-0.57%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.38%

15.71%

-1.33%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

25.64%

18.11%

+7.53%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

30.70%

18.70%

+12.00%

EDF vs. VIMCX - Expense Ratio Comparison

EDF has a 1.45% expense ratio, which is higher than VIMCX's 0.95% expense ratio.


Dividends

EDF vs. VIMCX - Dividend Comparison

EDF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 13.36%, more than VIMCX's 4.47% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EDF
Virtus Stone Harbor Emerging Markets Income Fund
13.36%14.49%15.32%16.71%17.31%12.91%16.46%15.67%19.37%13.58%14.75%17.93%
VIMCX
Virtus KAR Mid-Cap Core Fund
4.47%4.41%0.00%2.36%0.23%1.58%0.67%0.94%0.77%0.29%0.00%0.63%

Frequently Asked Questions


EDF and VIMCX have a correlation of 0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

EDF has higher volatility (4.92%) compared to VIMCX (4.23%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EDF dropped -64.23% vs VIMCX's -33.92%.

EDF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.82 vs -0.08), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EDF and VIMCX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer