ECSIX vs. MZCSX

Last updated Jun 25, 2026

ECSIX (Eaton Vance Short Duration Strategic Income Fund) and MZCSX (Muzinich Credit Opportunities Fund) are both Multisector Bonds funds. Over the past 10 years, ECSIX returned 4.02%/yr vs 3.45%/yr for MZCSX. At a 0.36 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. ECSIX charges 1.82%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for MZCSX.

Performance

ECSIX vs. MZCSX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Eaton Vance Short Duration Strategic Income Fund (ECSIX) and Muzinich Credit Opportunities Fund (MZCSX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ECSIX achieves a 1.92% return, which is significantly higher than MZCSX's 1.08% return. Over the past 10 years, ECSIX has outperformed MZCSX with an annualized return of 4.02%, while MZCSX has yielded a comparatively lower 3.45% annualized return.

ECSIX

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.82%
• YTD: 1.92%
• 6M: 2.21%
• 1Y: 8.01%
• 3Y*: 7.36%
• 5Y*: 4.19%
• 10Y*: 4.02%

MZCSX

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.73%
• YTD: 1.08%
• 6M: 1.19%
• 1Y: 4.74%
• 3Y*: 5.72%
• 5Y*: 2.14%
• 10Y*: 3.45%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ECSIX vs. MZCSX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
ECSIX Eaton Vance Short Duration Strategic Income Fund	1.92%	10.19%	5.71%	7.31%	-3.31%	0.69%	6.60%	5.76%	-3.37%	4.04%
MZCSX Muzinich Credit Opportunities Fund	1.08%	6.74%	4.27%	7.48%	-8.41%	1.11%	5.63%	10.77%	0.22%	4.70%

Correlation

The correlation between ECSIX and MZCSX is 0.68, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.68
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.76
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.63
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.43
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2014	0.36

Over the past year, ECSIX and MZCSX have become more correlated (0.68) than their long-term average of 0.36, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Return for Risk

ECSIX vs. MZCSX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ECSIX

ECSIX Risk / Return Rank: 86
ECSIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 94
ECSIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 94
ECSIX Omega Ratio Rank: 92
ECSIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 81
ECSIX Martin Ratio Rank: 67

MZCSX

MZCSX Risk / Return Rank: 56
MZCSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 59
MZCSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 70
MZCSX Omega Ratio Rank: 68
MZCSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 36
MZCSX Martin Ratio Rank: 46

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ECSIX vs. MZCSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Eaton Vance Short Duration Strategic Income Fund (ECSIX) and Muzinich Credit Opportunities Fund (MZCSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	ECSIX	MZCSX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.96	1.98	+0.98
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	4.46	3.05	+1.41
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.64	1.40	+0.25
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.45	2.05	+1.41
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	11.89	8.71	+3.18

ECSIX vs. MZCSX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ECSIX Sharpe Ratio is 2.96, which is higher than the MZCSX Sharpe Ratio of 1.98. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ECSIX and MZCSX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

ECSIX vs. MZCSX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ECSIX drawdown since its inception was -12.95%, roughly equal to the maximum MZCSX drawdown of -12.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ECSIX and MZCSX.

Drawdown Indicators

	ECSIX	MZCSX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-12.95%	-12.56%	-0.39%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-2.43%	-2.43%	0.00%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-2.64%	-3.26%	+0.62%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-7.19%	-12.05%	+4.86%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-12.53%	-12.56%	+0.03%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.63%	-0.21%	-0.42%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.34%	-1.60%	+0.26%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.70%	0.57%	+0.13%

Volatility

ECSIX vs. MZCSX - Volatility Comparison

Eaton Vance Short Duration Strategic Income Fund (ECSIX) has a higher volatility of 0.92% compared to Muzinich Credit Opportunities Fund (MZCSX) at 0.66%. This indicates that ECSIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MZCSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ECSIX	MZCSX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.92%	0.66%	+0.26%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	2.26%	2.00%	+0.26%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.84%	2.52%	+0.32%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	3.22%	3.42%	-0.20%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	3.17%	3.35%	-0.18%

ECSIX vs. MZCSX - Expense Ratio Comparison

ECSIX has a 1.82% expense ratio, which is higher than MZCSX's 0.60% expense ratio.

Dividends

ECSIX vs. MZCSX - Dividend Comparison

ECSIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.32%, less than MZCSX's 6.57% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
ECSIX Eaton Vance Short Duration Strategic Income Fund	6.32%	5.07%	6.21%	6.18%	4.78%	3.54%	3.47%	3.53%	3.19%	2.96%	3.20%	3.54%
MZCSX Muzinich Credit Opportunities Fund	6.57%	5.96%	5.19%	4.10%	1.35%	8.02%	2.41%	6.52%	2.11%	2.80%	3.99%	2.56%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ECSIX and MZCSX in my portfolio?

ECSIX and MZCSX have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, ECSIX or MZCSX?

ECSIX has higher volatility (0.92%) compared to MZCSX (0.66%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ECSIX dropped -12.95% vs MZCSX's -12.56%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

ECSIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.96 vs 1.98), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.