ECR3.DE vs. XLIQ.DE
ECR3.DE (Amundi Index Euro Corporate SRI 0-3 Y UCITS ETF) and XLIQ.DE (Xtrackers iBoxx EUR Liquid Covered Swap UCITS ETF) are both European Corporate Bonds funds - ECR3.DE tracks the Bloomberg MSCI Euro Corporate ESG BB+ Sustainability SRI 0-3 Year while XLIQ.DE tracks the iBoxx® EUR Liquid Covered Bond. Both are passively managed. At a 0.26 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. ECR3.DE charges 0.12%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for XLIQ.DE.
Performance
ECR3.DE vs. XLIQ.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
ECR3.DE
- 1D
- 0.04%
- 1M
- 0.24%
- YTD
- 0.60%
- 6M
- 0.69%
- 1Y
- 1.99%
- 3Y*
- 3.72%
- 5Y*
- 1.57%
- 10Y*
- —
XLIQ.DE
- 1D
- —
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ECR3.DE vs. XLIQ.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ECR3.DE Amundi Index Euro Corporate SRI 0-3 Y UCITS ETF | 0.60% | 2.97% | 4.19% | 4.18% | -3.69% | -0.14% | 0.37% |
XLIQ.DE Xtrackers iBoxx EUR Liquid Covered Swap UCITS ETF | 0.27% | 1.87% | 2.30% | 6.61% | -18.10% | -3.39% | 2.42% |
Correlation
The correlation between ECR3.DE and XLIQ.DE is 0.50, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.50 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.34 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.32 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2020 | 0.26 |
Over the past year, ECR3.DE and XLIQ.DE have become more correlated (0.50) than their long-term average of 0.26, meaning their price movements have been converging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ECR3.DE vs. XLIQ.DE — Risk / Return Rank
ECR3.DE
XLIQ.DE
ECR3.DE vs. XLIQ.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi Index Euro Corporate SRI 0-3 Y UCITS ETF (ECR3.DE) and Xtrackers iBoxx EUR Liquid Covered Swap UCITS ETF (XLIQ.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ECR3.DE | XLIQ.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.39 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.16 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.95 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ECR3.DE | XLIQ.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.79 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.12 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.80 | — | — |
Drawdowns
ECR3.DE vs. XLIQ.DE - Drawdown Comparison
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ECR3.DE | XLIQ.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -5.04% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -0.88% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -0.88% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -5.04% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.10% | — | — |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.05% | — | — |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.21% | — | — |
Volatility
ECR3.DE vs. XLIQ.DE - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ECR3.DE | XLIQ.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.38% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 0.96% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.06% | — | — |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 1.39% | — | — |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 1.74% | — | — |
ECR3.DE vs. XLIQ.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
ECR3.DE has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is lower than XLIQ.DE's 0.20% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
ECR3.DE vs. XLIQ.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither ECR3.DE nor XLIQ.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
ECR3.DE and XLIQ.DE have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, ECR3.DE is cheaper at 0.12% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ECR3.DE is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for XLIQ.DE.
ECR3.DE tracks Bloomberg MSCI Euro Corporate ESG BB+ Sustainability SRI 0-3 Year, while XLIQ.DE tracks iBoxx® EUR Liquid Covered Bond. They also come from different issuers: Amundi and Xtrackers. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for ECR3.DE and 0.20% for XLIQ.DE.
Find the right allocation for ECR3.DE and XLIQ.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer