ECOM.L vs. LDEG.L
ECOM.L (L&G Ecommerce Logistics UCITS ETF) and LDEG.L (L&G Quality Equity Dividends ESG Exclusions Europe ex-UK UCITS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ECOM.L is a Technology Equities fund tracking the MSCI World/Information Tech NR USD, while LDEG.L is a Europe Equities fund tracking the MSCI Europe Ex UK NR EUR. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, ECOM.L returned 1.40%/yr vs 14.86%/yr for LDEG.L. A 0.55 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. ECOM.L charges 0.49%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for LDEG.L.
Performance
ECOM.L vs. LDEG.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
ECOM.L is traded in USD, while LDEG.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the LDEG.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ECOM.L achieves a -0.01% return, which is significantly lower than LDEG.L's 10.14% return.
ECOM.L
- 1D
- 1.18%
- 1M
- 4.11%
- YTD
- -0.01%
- 6M
- 3.24%
- 1Y
- 6.47%
- 3Y*
- 8.92%
- 5Y*
- 1.40%
- 10Y*
- —
LDEG.L
- 1D
- 0.94%
- 1M
- 0.51%
- YTD
- 10.14%
- 6M
- 14.79%
- 1Y
- 29.27%
- 3Y*
- 27.12%
- 5Y*
- 14.86%
- 10Y*
- —
ECOM.L vs. LDEG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ECOM.L L&G Ecommerce Logistics UCITS ETF | -0.01% | 11.07% | 2.89% | 21.80% | -21.59% | 0.65% |
LDEG.L L&G Quality Equity Dividends ESG Exclusions Europe ex-UK UCITS ETF | 10.14% | 55.86% | 7.01% | 20.35% | -5.55% | -2.70% |
Correlation
The correlation between ECOM.L and LDEG.L is 0.53, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.53 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.60 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.56 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 10, 2021 | 0.55 |
The correlation between ECOM.L and LDEG.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.53 to 0.60 - a consistent structural relationship.
ECOM.L vs. LDEG.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
ECOM.L
LDEG.L
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
Technology
Real Estate
-
Consumer Defensive
Financial Services
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Energy
-
Healthcare
-
Utilities
-
Industrials
ECOM.L
LDEG.L
Consumer Cyclical
ECOM.L
LDEG.L
Technology
ECOM.L
LDEG.L
Real Estate
ECOM.L
LDEG.L
-
Consumer Defensive
ECOM.L
LDEG.L
Financial Services
ECOM.L
LDEG.L
Basic Materials
ECOM.L
-
LDEG.L
Communication Services
ECOM.L
-
LDEG.L
Energy
ECOM.L
-
LDEG.L
Healthcare
ECOM.L
-
LDEG.L
Utilities
ECOM.L
-
LDEG.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ECOM.L vs. LDEG.L — Risk / Return Rank
ECOM.L
LDEG.L
ECOM.L vs. LDEG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for L&G Ecommerce Logistics UCITS ETF (ECOM.L) and L&G Quality Equity Dividends ESG Exclusions Europe ex-UK UCITS ETF (LDEG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ECOM.L | LDEG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.76 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.30 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.08 | 1.38 | -0.30 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.46 | 3.27 | -2.81 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.25 | 11.10 | -9.84 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ECOM.L | LDEG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.37 | 2.13 | -1.76 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.07 | 0.93 | -0.86 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.40 | 0.95 | -0.55 |
Drawdowns
ECOM.L vs. LDEG.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ECOM.L drawdown since its inception was -39.66%, which is greater than LDEG.L's maximum drawdown of -31.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ECOM.L and LDEG.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ECOM.L | LDEG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -39.66% | -31.70% | -7.96% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.90% | -8.91% | -4.99% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -21.23% | -13.44% | -7.79% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -39.66% | -31.70% | -7.96% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.72% | -1.57% | -2.15% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.46% | -5.36% | -6.10% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.16% | 2.63% | +2.53% |
Volatility
ECOM.L vs. LDEG.L - Volatility Comparison
L&G Ecommerce Logistics UCITS ETF (ECOM.L) has a higher volatility of 4.76% compared to L&G Quality Equity Dividends ESG Exclusions Europe ex-UK UCITS ETF (LDEG.L) at 4.24%. This indicates that ECOM.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LDEG.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ECOM.L | LDEG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.76% | 4.24% | +0.52% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.06% | 10.82% | +2.24% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.45% | 13.68% | +3.77% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.40% | 19.65% | -0.25% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.10% | 19.65% | -0.55% |
ECOM.L vs. LDEG.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
ECOM.L has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is higher than LDEG.L's 0.25% expense ratio.
Dividends
ECOM.L vs. LDEG.L - Dividend Comparison
ECOM.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while LDEG.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.13%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ECOM.L L&G Ecommerce Logistics UCITS ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
LDEG.L L&G Quality Equity Dividends ESG Exclusions Europe ex-UK UCITS ETF | 3.13% | 3.43% | 4.21% | 4.11% | 3.70% | 3.11% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ECOM.L and LDEG.L have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, LDEG.L is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
LDEG.L is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for ECOM.L.
ECOM.L is categorized as Technology Equities, while LDEG.L is Europe Equities. ECOM.L tracks MSCI World/Information Tech NR USD, while LDEG.L tracks MSCI Europe Ex UK NR EUR. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for ECOM.L and 0.25% for LDEG.L.
Find the right allocation for ECOM.L and LDEG.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer