ECOG.L vs. XLKS.L
ECOG.L (Legal & General UCITS ETF plc - L&G Ecommerce Logistics UCITS ETF) and XLKS.L (Invesco Technology S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF Acc) are both Technology Equities funds - ECOG.L tracks the MSCI World/Information Tech NR USD while XLKS.L tracks the S&P® Select Sector Capped 20% Technology Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, ECOG.L returned 2.25%/yr vs 27.33%/yr for XLKS.L. A 0.65 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. ECOG.L charges 0.49%/yr vs 0.14%/yr for XLKS.L.
Performance
ECOG.L vs. XLKS.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
ECOG.L is traded in GBp, while XLKS.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the XLKS.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ECOG.L achieves a -1.05% return, which is significantly lower than XLKS.L's 27.60% return.
ECOG.L
- 1D
- -1.41%
- 1M
- 2.40%
- YTD
- -1.05%
- 6M
- 0.38%
- 1Y
- 7.32%
- 3Y*
- 5.55%
- 5Y*
- 2.25%
- 10Y*
- —
XLKS.L
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 19.35%
- YTD
- 27.60%
- 6M
- 26.12%
- 1Y
- 59.39%
- 3Y*
- 34.60%
- 5Y*
- 27.33%
- 10Y*
- 27.71%
ECOG.L vs. XLKS.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ECOG.L Legal & General UCITS ETF plc - L&G Ecommerce Logistics UCITS ETF | -1.05% | 3.54% | 4.57% | 15.08% | -12.19% | 19.87% | 38.74% | 26.75% | -16.54% |
XLKS.L Invesco Technology S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF Acc | 26.93% | 15.38% | 44.20% | 52.61% | -20.70% | 36.00% | 38.58% | 43.17% | 0.20% |
Correlation
The correlation between ECOG.L and XLKS.L is 0.52, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.52 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.52 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.60 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 24, 2018 | 0.65 |
The correlation between ECOG.L and XLKS.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.52 (3 years) to 0.65 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
ECOG.L vs. XLKS.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
ECOG.L
XLKS.L
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
-
Technology
Real Estate
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Financial Services
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
-
Energy
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Industrials
ECOG.L
XLKS.L
Consumer Cyclical
ECOG.L
XLKS.L
-
Technology
ECOG.L
XLKS.L
Real Estate
ECOG.L
XLKS.L
-
Consumer Defensive
ECOG.L
XLKS.L
-
Financial Services
ECOG.L
XLKS.L
Basic Materials
ECOG.L
-
XLKS.L
-
Communication Services
ECOG.L
-
XLKS.L
-
Energy
ECOG.L
-
XLKS.L
-
Healthcare
ECOG.L
-
XLKS.L
-
Utilities
ECOG.L
-
XLKS.L
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ECOG.L vs. XLKS.L — Risk / Return Rank
ECOG.L
XLKS.L
ECOG.L vs. XLKS.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Legal & General UCITS ETF plc - L&G Ecommerce Logistics UCITS ETF (ECOG.L) and Invesco Technology S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF Acc (XLKS.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ECOG.L | XLKS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.44 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.94 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.10 | 1.48 | -0.39 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.57 | 3.49 | -2.92 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.54 | 8.94 | -7.39 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ECOG.L | XLKS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.51 | 2.95 | -2.44 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.14 | 1.19 | -1.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 1.25 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.47 | 1.11 | -0.64 |
Drawdowns
ECOG.L vs. XLKS.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ECOG.L drawdown since its inception was -26.12%, smaller than the maximum XLKS.L drawdown of -28.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ECOG.L and XLKS.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ECOG.L | XLKS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -26.12% | -28.80% | +2.68% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.80% | -16.92% | +4.12% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -22.66% | -28.80% | +6.14% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.12% | -28.80% | +2.68% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -28.80% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.62% | 0.00% | -4.62% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.65% | -4.71% | -2.94% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.73% | 6.63% | -1.90% |
Volatility
ECOG.L vs. XLKS.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Legal & General UCITS ETF plc - L&G Ecommerce Logistics UCITS ETF (ECOG.L) is 4.15%, while Invesco Technology S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF Acc (XLKS.L) has a volatility of 6.83%. This indicates that ECOG.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XLKS.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ECOG.L | XLKS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.15% | 6.83% | -2.68% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.71% | 15.12% | -4.41% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.40% | 20.16% | -5.76% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.55% | 23.00% | -6.45% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.05% | 22.08% | -5.03% |
ECOG.L vs. XLKS.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
ECOG.L has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is higher than XLKS.L's 0.14% expense ratio.
Dividends
ECOG.L vs. XLKS.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither ECOG.L nor XLKS.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
ECOG.L and XLKS.L have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XLKS.L is cheaper at 0.14% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XLKS.L is cheaper with a 0.14% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for ECOG.L.
ECOG.L tracks MSCI World/Information Tech NR USD, while XLKS.L tracks S&P® Select Sector Capped 20% Technology Index. They also come from different issuers: Legal & General and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for ECOG.L and 0.14% for XLKS.L.
Find the right allocation for ECOG.L and XLKS.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer