ECOG.L vs. SHLG.L
ECOG.L (Legal & General UCITS ETF plc - L&G Ecommerce Logistics UCITS ETF) and SHLG.L (iShares Digital Security UCITS ETF USD (Dist)) are both Technology Equities funds tracking the MSCI World/Information Tech NR USD, from Legal & General and iShares respectively. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, ECOG.L returned 2.25%/yr vs 11.69%/yr for SHLG.L. A 0.72 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. ECOG.L charges 0.49%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for SHLG.L.
Performance
ECOG.L vs. SHLG.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
ECOG.L is traded in GBp, while SHLG.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the SHLG.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ECOG.L achieves a -1.05% return, which is significantly lower than SHLG.L's 22.33% return.
ECOG.L
- 1D
- -1.41%
- 1M
- 2.40%
- YTD
- -1.05%
- 6M
- 0.38%
- 1Y
- 7.32%
- 3Y*
- 5.55%
- 5Y*
- 2.25%
- 10Y*
- —
SHLG.L
- 1D
- -0.45%
- 1M
- 16.65%
- YTD
- 22.33%
- 6M
- 23.64%
- 1Y
- 29.83%
- 3Y*
- 19.56%
- 5Y*
- 11.69%
- 10Y*
- —
ECOG.L vs. SHLG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ECOG.L Legal & General UCITS ETF plc - L&G Ecommerce Logistics UCITS ETF | -1.05% | 3.54% | 4.57% | 15.08% | -12.19% | 16.92% |
SHLG.L iShares Digital Security UCITS ETF USD (Dist) | 22.33% | 3.87% | 18.54% | 26.67% | -20.62% | 20.85% |
Correlation
The correlation between ECOG.L and SHLG.L is 0.62, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.62 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.68 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.72 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 24, 2021 | 0.72 |
The correlation between ECOG.L and SHLG.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.62 (1 year) to 0.72 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
ECOG.L vs. SHLG.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
ECOG.L
SHLG.L
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
-
Technology
Real Estate
Consumer Defensive
-
Financial Services
-
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
-
Energy
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Industrials
ECOG.L
SHLG.L
Consumer Cyclical
ECOG.L
SHLG.L
-
Technology
ECOG.L
SHLG.L
Real Estate
ECOG.L
SHLG.L
Consumer Defensive
ECOG.L
SHLG.L
-
Financial Services
ECOG.L
SHLG.L
-
Basic Materials
ECOG.L
-
SHLG.L
-
Communication Services
ECOG.L
-
SHLG.L
-
Energy
ECOG.L
-
SHLG.L
-
Healthcare
ECOG.L
-
SHLG.L
-
Utilities
ECOG.L
-
SHLG.L
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ECOG.L vs. SHLG.L — Risk / Return Rank
ECOG.L
SHLG.L
ECOG.L vs. SHLG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Legal & General UCITS ETF plc - L&G Ecommerce Logistics UCITS ETF (ECOG.L) and iShares Digital Security UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (SHLG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ECOG.L | SHLG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.06 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.44 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.10 | 1.29 | -0.19 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.57 | 2.35 | -1.78 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.54 | 5.48 | -3.94 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ECOG.L | SHLG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.51 | 1.57 | -1.06 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.14 | 0.62 | -0.48 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.47 | 0.64 | -0.17 |
Drawdowns
ECOG.L vs. SHLG.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ECOG.L drawdown since its inception was -26.12%, roughly equal to the maximum SHLG.L drawdown of -27.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ECOG.L and SHLG.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ECOG.L | SHLG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -26.12% | -27.07% | +0.95% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.80% | -12.65% | -0.15% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -22.66% | -24.02% | +1.36% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.12% | -27.07% | +0.95% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.62% | -0.45% | -4.17% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.65% | -9.50% | +1.85% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.73% | 5.43% | -0.70% |
Volatility
ECOG.L vs. SHLG.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Legal & General UCITS ETF plc - L&G Ecommerce Logistics UCITS ETF (ECOG.L) is 4.15%, while iShares Digital Security UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (SHLG.L) has a volatility of 7.38%. This indicates that ECOG.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SHLG.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ECOG.L | SHLG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.15% | 7.38% | -3.23% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.71% | 14.88% | -4.17% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.40% | 18.99% | -4.59% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.55% | 18.94% | -2.39% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.05% | 18.85% | -1.80% |
ECOG.L vs. SHLG.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
ECOG.L has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is higher than SHLG.L's 0.40% expense ratio.
Dividends
ECOG.L vs. SHLG.L - Dividend Comparison
ECOG.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SHLG.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.32%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ECOG.L Legal & General UCITS ETF plc - L&G Ecommerce Logistics UCITS ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SHLG.L iShares Digital Security UCITS ETF USD (Dist) | 0.32% | 0.39% | 0.47% | 0.43% | 0.62% | 0.66% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ECOG.L and SHLG.L have a correlation of 0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SHLG.L is cheaper at 0.40% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SHLG.L is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for ECOG.L.
Both ETFs track MSCI World/Information Tech NR USD. They also come from different issuers: Legal & General and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for ECOG.L and 0.40% for SHLG.L.
Find the right allocation for ECOG.L and SHLG.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer